Ben Davidson
Claes G. Trope
Reuven Reich- 1Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- 2University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway
- 3Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- 4Institute of Drug Research, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
The tumor microenvironment, consisting of stromal myofibroblasts, endothelial cells, and leukocytes, is growingly perceived to be a major contributor to the pathogenesis and disease progression in practically all cancer types. Stromal myofibroblasts produce angiogenic factors, proteases, growth factors, immune response-modulating proteins, anti-apoptotic proteins, and signaling molecules, and express surface receptors and respond to stimuli initiated in the tumor cells to establish a bi-directional communication network in the microenvironment to promote tumor cell invasion and metastasis. Many of these molecules are candidates for targeted therapy and the cancer stroma has been recently regarded as target for biological intervention. This review provides an overview of the biology and clinical role of the stroma in ovarian cancer.
Introduction
Cancer is characterized by uncontrolled cell growth due to the combined effect of growth-promoting and cell death-suppressing signaling. Tumor growth and progression in carcinomas characteristically involves a pre-invasive phase, followed by invasion of the surrounding stroma, entry into blood and lymphatic vessels, and metastasis. It is growingly perceived that all these phases require cross-talk between tumor cells and their microenvironment, which consists of immune system effectors, endothelial cells, and stromal myofibroblasts. The latter cell population, often referred to as cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF), has a particularly important role in tumor biology, due to its ability to dynamically modify the composition of the extracellular matrix (ECM), thereby facilitating invasion and subsequent metastatic colonization, and to produce and secrete tumor-promoting factors (1–3). This has impacted on the development of therapeutic strategies designed at targeting stromal myofibroblasts in cancer (4).
Ovarian cancer, the most lethal gynecologic malignancy (5), is a heterogeneous group of malignant tumors, of which ovarian carcinoma (OC) is the most common one. The common histological types of OC – serous, endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous carcinoma, are distinct morphological entities that are growingly perceived to be of different etiology, with unique genetic and phenotypic characteristics and different clinical behavior, including response to chemotherapy (6). OC patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease in the majority of cases, and despite aggressive surgery combined with platinum-based chemotherapy often succumb to their disease, primarily due to chemoresistance in recurrent tumors (7).
As in other cancers, the OC stroma produces and expresses myriad molecules relevant for tumor biology, and the mere presence of a large stroma component in OC was reported to be associated with poor survival in advanced-stage disease (8). This review summarizes current data regarding the expression and clinical relevance of molecules related to the cancer microenvironment in OC stromal cells. Data related to the immune system or to the tumor vasculature are not discussed. Studies of areas which remain controversial, such as the role of mesenchymal stem cells in OC biology, are similarly not the focus of this paper.
Proteases
Proteases are critical mediators of invasion and metastasis and are the cancer-associated molecules which have been most frequently studied in the OC stroma. Studies have predominantly focused on the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) family, but a significant number of papers have focused on urinary-type plasminogen activator and cathepsin D.
Matrix metalloproteinases are a family of at least 23 membrane-bound (MT-MMP) or secreted zinc-dependent endopeptidases involved in invasion, tumor growth, inflammation, and angiogenesis. MMP family members share several domains, including a signal peptide required for secretion, a propeptide which keeps the enzyme latent, catalytic domain, and hemopexin-like domain, the latter required for binding tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMP) and MMP activation. MMP-2 (Gelatinase A, 72 kDa type IV collagenase) and MMP-9 (Gelatinase B, 92 kDa type IV collagenase) additionally contain a collagen-binding area adjacent to their catalytic domain. In addition to ECM molecules, MMP substrates include proteases (other MMPs, plasminogen), growth factors (transforming growth factor; TGF), tyrosine kinase receptors (epidermal growth factor receptor, fibroblast growth factor receptor; EGFR, FGFR1), adhesion molecules (CD44, E-cadherin, αV integrin), chemokines, and the metastasis inhibitor KISS-1. MMPs are negatively regulated by various proteins, including TIMP-1–4, α2 macroglobulins, thrombospondins, and RECK. However, MMP-2 activation requires the formation of a complex with TIMP-2 and MT1-MMP (MMP-14) (9–11).
Collagen I and an anti-β1 integrin antibody induced activation of proMMP-2 in OC-derived fibroblasts in vitro (12). OC cell lines implanted in the peritoneal cavity of mice lacking the MMP-9 gene had fewer and smaller tumors than cells injected into mice with wild-type MMP-9 (13). MMP-2, MMP-9, MT1-MMP, and MT2-MMP were detected in the mouse stroma in animals inoculated with OC cells, but only MMP-2 and MT1-MMP levels were increased compared to normal mouse ovaries. Stromal expression of these molecules was unrelated to metastasis, the latter being rather related to tumor MT1-MMP levels (14).
The presence of stromal MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-9, MT1-MMP, and TIMP-2 mRNA and/or protein has been shown in multiple studies of clinical OC specimens (15–35). However, the clinical significance of MMP and TIMP expression in the OC stroma remains controversial. In analysis of 90 primary OC, MMP-2, MMP-9, and MT1-MMP protein expression in stromal cells by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was significantly related to advanced-stage disease and poor disease-specific survival (DSS). Stromal MMP-9 and MT1-MMP were independent prognosticators in multivariate analysis (28). Higher stromal MMP-9 protein expression was similarly related to poor DSS in univariate, though not multivariate, analysis in another study (31). Stromal MMP-2 protein expression was related to shorter overall and disease-free survival (OS, DFS) in endometrioid, but not in serous OC in a third report (27). In contrast, in a smaller study of 33 OC, absence of MMP-2 from the OC stroma was associated with more aggressive disease (20). TIMP-2 mRNA expression in stromal cells of both primary OC and OC metastases was associated with poor outcome in univariate analysis, whereas the presence of MT1-MMP mRNA in stromal cells in metastases correlated with significantly longer survival. The association between stromal TIMP-2 mRNA expression in primary carcinomas and poor survival retained its significance in a multivariate analysis. Stromal MMP-2 and MMP-9 mRNA expression in primary or metastatic disease was unrelated to survival (19). In contrast, stromal TIMP-2 protein expression was significantly related to better chemoresponse and longer progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in analysis of 43 tumors (33).
Stromal expression of MMP-2 (30–32, 34), MMP-7 (34), MMP-9 (34), MMP-11 (32), MT1-MMP (34), TIMP-1 (34), and TIMP-2 (34) proteins was unrelated to survival in several studies.
The glycoprotein extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN; CD147) is member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of adhesion molecules, which stimulates the synthesis of several MMPs and binds MMP-1 and integrins on the surface of tumor cells.
Extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer was detected in tumor cells in primary OC, solid metastases, and malignant effusions in OC, as well as in stromal cells and endothelial cells. In solid lesions, EMMPRIN mRNA by in situ hybridization (ISH) was significantly co-expressed with β1 integrin mRNA in stromal cells. In survival analysis, EMMPRIN protein expression in stromal and endothelial cells of primary carcinomas correlated with poor survival (36).
Extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer protein expression by immunofluorescence was found in both tumor and stromal cells in a study of 120 primary OC and 40 intraperitoneal metastases. The monocarboxylate transporters MCT1 and MCT4, reported to be associated with EMMPRIN expression and drug resistance, were additionally detected in these specimens (37).
Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is a serine protease that is synthesized as a latent pro-enzyme and activated by several proteases, including plasmin, cathepsins B and L, and kallikreins (KLKs). uPA and its homolog tissue-type PA (tPA) cleave plasminogen to plasmin, thereby mediating degradation of fibrin and other ECM proteins and the activation of several MMPs, as well as growth factors such as basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), and TGF-β. The uPA receptor uPAR additionally binds ECM proteins and integrins. The plasminogen activator inhibitors PAI1 and PAI2 and the plasmin inhibitor α2 antiplasmin negatively regulate this system (38, 39).
Analysis of uPA mRNA and protein expression in 57 ovarian tumors and 8 abdominal metastases showed expression of uPA mRNA in epithelial cells in benign and borderline tumors, whereas poorly differentiated primary OC and metastases of different histological grade had predominantly stromal expression. In contrast, uPA protein expression was seen in both compartments (40). In another paper by this group, increased expression of uPA, uPAR, and PAI1 mRNA was found in poorly differentiated primary OC with solid growth pattern and in metastases compared to cystic, better differentiated tumors (41). Protein expression of uPA and uPAR, as well as several MMP members, was frequently seen in the OC stroma in both primary carcinomas and metastases, though uPA and uPAR were absent in the stroma of well-differentiated tumors (42). In a murine OC model, uPAR−/− mice lacking uPAR in host mesothelial cells had reduced tumor and ability to form peritoneal metastases, as well as reduced ascites formation and longer survival compared to uPAR+/+ mice. In clinical specimens, higher stromal uPAR protein expression was seen in OC compared to normal ovaries, with higher expression associated with higher histological grade (43).
The ETS family of transcription factors regulates the transcription of a large number of cancer-associated molecules, including uPA, uPAR, MMP-7, and MMP-9, as well as the apoptosis inhibitor Survivin, the tumor suppressor Maspin, the cell cycle protein p21/CIP1, and Slug, mediator of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), thereby affecting many cellular processes, including angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis, and cell survival (44).
Ets-1 mRNA is co-expressed with MMP-1 and MMP-9 mRNA in the OC stroma (22). In analysis of 66 primary and metastatic OC from long-term and short-term survivors, Ets-1 mRNA was detected in stromal cells in 33% of cases using ISH (Figure 1), more often in tumors of short-term survivors, and was co-expressed with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mRNA. Ets-1 mRNA expression in both tumor and stromal cells was associated with poor survival in univariate analysis, and expression in stromal cells was an independent prognostic factor in a multivariate analysis (45).
Figure 1. Localization of mRNA of cancer-associated molecules to the ovarian carcinoma stroma. OC stromal cells express mRNA of the Ets-1 transcription factor (A), laminin receptors (B,C), and the angiogenic factors IL-8 and bFGF (D,E); (F) negative control. Tumor cells express Ets-1, IL-8, and bFGF (NBT-BCIP as chromogen, nuclear fast red as counterstain).
In another study of the same cohort, the expression of PEA3, another Ets family member, was assessed using ISH. PEA3 mRNA was detected in stromal cells in 89% of tumors, but strong expression was limited to the stroma of grade 2–3 tumors. PEA3 mRNA expression in stromal cells was significantly related to MMP-2 mRNA expression in carcinoma cells, whereas PEA3 expression in carcinoma cells was significantly related to mRNA expression of the β1 integrin subunit, bFGF, and EMMPRIN in stromal cells. PEA3 mRNA was detected significantly more often in both carcinoma and stromal cells in tumors of short-term survivors and PEA3 expression in stromal cells correlated with shorter DFS and OS in univariate and multivariate survival analysis (46).
The clinical role of cathepsins, another family of proteases, was investigated in several studies. The level of cathepsin D, a lysosomal aspartyl protease, measured by immunoradiometric assay in OC tissue homogenates, was unrelated to clinical parameters or survival, with similar results for protein expression in tumor and stromal cells by IHC (47). In a study limited to stage III tumors (n = 185), tumor cell cathepsin D expression was related to longer OS in univariate analysis, with no such role for stromal expression. However, combined epithelial and stromal expression was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (48). No association was found with PFS. In contrast, cathepsin D expression in stromal cells was an independent prognostic factor of longer DFS, but not OS, in IHC analysis of 80 OC, with no prognostic role observed for tumor cell expression (49).
Cathepsin B, a cysteine protease, and the cysteine protease inhibitor cystatin C were detected in OC cells and their stroma, and were absent in cystadenomas (50).
Tissue KLKs are a family of 15 serine proteases encoded by a single gene cluster located at chromosome 19q13.4. Analysis of KLK4 expression in 43 primary and 63 metastatic OC showed stromal KLK4 expression in 48/103 specimens, which was significantly higher in primary tumors compared to metastases, with no prognostic role for this protein (51).
ECM Proteins and Their Receptors
The ECM composition in OC and its clinical relevance has been the subject of several studies.
Analysis of mRNA expression of the proα1(I) and proα2(I) chains of type I procollagen and of the proα1(III) chain of type I procollagen by ISH demonstrated their localization to the OC stroma, whereas expression was weaker or absent in the stroma of benign cysts. In poorly differentiated carcinomas (n = 2), signals were additionally detected in tumor cells (52). Differences in the density of collagen type I fibers were observed between cystadenomas, borderline tumors, and OC of different histological grade in another study (53). Oncofetal fibronectin was detected in the OC stroma, but not in endometriosis, suggesting this protein was selectively expressed by the tumor microenvironment (54). Fibulin-1, an estrogen-regulated calcium-binding and acidic ECM glycoprotein, was localized to the OC stroma, with strongest expression in proximity to tumor cells, and its mRNA was localized to the latter compartment. Staining increased from normal ovaries through benign and borderline tumors to OC, and was associated with progesterone receptor, but not estrogen receptor expression (55).
Analysis of the expression pattern of laminin γ2 chain in mucinous ovarian tumors with gastrointestinal differentiation by IHC showed basement membrane localization in adenomas, borderline tumors, intraepithelial carcinomas, and adenocarcinomas with expansile growth pattern, whereas expression was cytoplasmic or stromal in carcinomas growing with infiltrative pattern (56). Stromal expression of laminin-5 γ2 chain with concomitant presence of MT1-MMP on the tumor cell surface was reported in clear cell OC (57). Galectin-1, a laminin-binding protein regulating tumor cell proliferation and adhesion to matrix, was overexpressed in OC compared to normal ovaries and co-localized with laminin-1 and fibronectin. Its levels were increased in fibroblasts cultured with OC cells in vitro with effect on tumor cell proliferation and adhesion (58). Analysis of the expression of two laminin receptors, the 67-kDa laminin receptor precursor (LBP) and the α6 integrin subunit, in 41 primary OC and 75 solid metastases showed mRNA expression by ISH in stromal cells in 68 and 20% of cases (Figure 1), respectively. No association with clinicopathologic parameters or outcome was found (59).
Analysis of additional integrin subunits in primary OC and solid metastases showed stromal expression of the β1 integrin subunit mRNA by ISH in 2 independent tumor series, whereas the αV subunit mRNA was found in the stroma in only one of the series. While tumor αV subunit mRNA expression was associated with poor survival in one of these studies, the presence of these subunits in stromal cells had no prognostic value (60, 61).
The mRNA expression of angiogenic cytokines and growth factors was analyzed in two studies. bFGF, interleukin-8 (IL-8), and VEGF mRNA was expressed in both tumor and stromal cells with no significant difference between primary carcinomas and metastases. bFGF was the most strongly and frequently expressed transcript in primary OC and in solid metastases in both series, with intermediate expression of IL-8 and low expression of VEGF (Figure 1). None of these factors was related to clinicopathologic parameters or disease outcome (62, 63). In another series, IL-8 mRNA expression was higher in tumor compared to stromal cells in OC specimens, whereas the protein was expressed in both compartments. IL-8 receptor B, but not A, was expressed in stromal cells (64). In a study of FGF-8 expression in OC, this cytokine was localized to tumor cells, whereas its receptors FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR4 were expressed by tumor cells, and to lesser extent, in stromal cells (65).
Hyaluronan (also termed hyaluronic acid or hyaluronate; HA), a large, linear, negatively charged polysaccharide with strong capacity to attract water, maintains tissue hydration and osmotic balance under normal condition. It additionally regulates cell adhesion, migration, apoptosis, and proliferation via interaction with specific cell surface receptors, which include the adhesion molecule CD44. HA has been shown to be involved in tumor progression of multiple cancers, through its effect on the above processes, as well as angiogenesis, invasion, and EMT (66).
HA is expressed in the stroma of both stage I and stage III OC, and its expression is increased in peritoneal metastases from patients with stage III disease compared to primary carcinomas (67). Analysis of 309 primary OC showed significant association between stromal HA expression and high histological grade, serous histology, advanced-stage and large residual disease volume, with no relationship to tumor cell CD44 expression. High stromal HA expression was further significantly related to poor relapse-free survival (RFS) and OS, and HA was more highly expressed in 45 patient-matched metastases additionally studied (68). Allelic imbalance at chromosome 3p21.3, a region harboring the hyaluronidase genes HYAL1-3, was found in microdissected tumor and stromal cells of borderline tumors and OC (69).
The unique stroma of clear cell OC was reported to contain both HA and collagen type IV, and these components were involved in its formation or modification (70, 71).
Proteoglycans, composed of a core protein to which glycosaminoglycan chains are attached, are a family of highly conserved macromolecules localized to the cellular membrane or the ECM. Proteoglycans are expressed by multiple cancers and mediate angiogenesis, tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis (72, 73).
Davies et al. analyzed the expression of syndecan-1–4, glypican-1, and perlecan in 147 ovarian specimens, including 115 OC, using IHC. Syndecan-1 was expressed in tumor and stromal cells of benign ovarian tumors, borderline tumors, and OC, with most intense staining in areas of invasion in OC, and was absent in normal ovaries. Syndecan-2 and -3 and glypican-1 were expressed in the stroma of all types of specimens, as was true for syndecan-4 in epithelial cells. Stromal perlecan expression was frequently seen in benign tissue and borderline tumors, but was lost in 67% of carcinomas. Stromal syndecan-1 expression was significantly associated with poor PFS and OS, though not independently (74).
In another study, stromal syndecan-1 and versican expression were associated with advanced-stage, serous histology, massive ascites, positive peritoneal cytology, and sub-optimal cytoreduction, as well as poor PFS and OS, though not independently (75). Ghosh et al. reported on overexpression of versican in OC compared to normal ovaries, as well as in advanced-stage compared to early-stage disease. Stromal versican expression was associated with higher microvessel counts, platinum resistance, and poor PFS and OS in univariate analysis (76). In another study, stromal versican expression was related to non-mucinous histology, advanced-stage, and reduced 5-year survival rate (77).
Decorin protein was reported to be expressed by the OC stroma, whereas tumor cells were negative, despite the presence of its mRNA in both cellular compartments (78). Periostin was overexpressed in the OC stroma compared to borderline and benign tumors and its presence in OC was associated with advanced-stage, disease recurrence, and poor OS, the latter also in multivariate analysis (79).
TGF-β is a ubiquitous cytokine with a dual role as both growth suppressor and promoter, effects which are largely mediated by the stroma and immune system. TGF-β acts predominantly as tumor promoter in several cancer types, including OC, and is consequently under consideration as a potential therapeutic target (80).
Comparative analysis of TGF-β1 and latent TGF-β1 binding protein 1 (LTBP-1) expression in serous and mucinous OC and adenomas showed strong stromal expression of these proteins limited to the former group (81). Transcriptome analysis of microdissected tumor and stromal cells from OC specimens and TGF-β-treated normal ovarian fibroblasts recently identified versican as an upregulated gene in CAF, and versican expression was upregulated by TGF-β, with resulting activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway and increased levels of CD44, MMP-9, and the hyaluronan-mediated motility receptor (82). Chloride intracellular channel 4 (CLIC4) was shown to mediate conversion of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts following stimulation with TGF-β1 in vitro and was frequently expressed in the OC stroma (83). Expression of TGF-β in the stroma of primary and recurrent OC was reported in another study (84).
Protein expression of the βA-subunit of activin A, member of the TGF-β superfamily, which regulates migration and invasion during EMT, metastasis, and MMP expression, was increased in stromal cells from OC specimens compared to adenomas (85).
Stromal protein and mRNA expression of secreted protein, acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC; a.k.a osteonectin), a matricellular protein involved in angiogenesis and tumor invasion, was higher in OC compared to normal ovaries and borderline tumors. Tumor cells expressed SPARC protein, but not mRNA (86, 87).
Endothelins, mitogenic peptides with autocrine and paracrine effect, stimulated the growth of fibroblast cell lines isolated from ascites specimens of OC patients, and were found in both the tumor cell and stromal compartments in clinical specimens (88).
The platelet-derived growth factor receptors PDGFRα and PDGFRβ were expressed in stromal cells in 32 and 44% of OC in analysis of 170 tumors, but their expression was unrelated to clinical parameters or survival (89).
The granulin–epithelin precursor (GEP/progranulin/PC-cell-derived growth factor) is a 68-kDa secreted protein with several higher molecular weight forms due to glycosylation, most commonly of 88 kDa. GEP was shown to be a growth factor in OC (90). Analysis of 189 solid OC specimens (64 primary OC, 125 metastases) showed GEP expression in stromal and endothelial cells 52 and 67% specimens, respectively. Stromal GEP expression was significantly lower in metastases sampled during or following chemotherapy compared to chemo-naïve tumors, and the presence of GEP-positive stromal cells in untreated primary tumors correlated with worse OS (91).
Insulin-like growth factor-1 was detected in the OC stroma, with strongest expression around vessels, with less frequent and weaker expression in tumor cells (92).
Transcriptional Regulators
HOX transcription factors constitute a large family of proteins that regulate embryogenesis and organogenesis via spatial cues, as well as by regulating apoptosis, proliferation, differentiation, motility, and angiogenesis. HOX members are differentially expressed in adult tissues and regulate the expression of cadherins, integrins, NCAM (CD56), and p53. Deregulation of HOX members has been shown in different cancers (93, 94).
HOXA7 was overexpressed in the tumor cell nuclei and in the stroma of clear cell OC compared to other OC histotypes, and expression was lowest in serous OC (95). HOXA9 expression in OC cells induced normal peritoneal fibroblasts and adipose tissue- and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells to develop CAF features, a process shown to be mediated by TGF-β2 upregulation of CXCL12, IL-6, and VEGF-A (96). HOXA10 expression in OSE cells stimulated interaction with the ECM proteins fibronectin and vitronectin, with omental mesothelial cells and fibroblasts (97).
DNA topoisomerase IIα (TOP2α), an enzyme involved in DNA replication, RNA transcription, chromosomal condensation, and mitotic chromatid separation, is the target of chemotherapeutic drugs such as etoposide and doxorubicin. Comparative analysis of primary and recurrent OC specimens showed reduced TOP2α expression in tumor cells in the latter group, whereas stromal expression was increased (98).
Vestigial like 3, a putative tumor suppressor, was expressed in high-grade serous OC cells, and to a lesser extent in stromal cells, in a series of 182 tumors, and higher stromal expression was associated with a trend for longer survival (99).
Nuclear expression of Snail1, one of the key regulators of EMT, was observed in tumor and stromal cells in 23 and 24% specimens, respectively, in a series of 74 OC. Snail1 expression was minimal in borderline tumors and absent in adenomas and normal ovaries. Snail1 tumor cell and stromal expression was unrelated to clinicopathologic parameters or survival (100).
Expression of two of four studied members of the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) family of transcription factors, reported initially to regulate adipocyte proliferation and differentiation, was observed in the OC stroma, whereas all four proteins (C/EBP-α, -β, -δ, and -ζ) were expressed in tumor cells (101).
Nuclear expression of adrenal 4-binding protein/steroidogenic factor-1 (Ad4BP/SF-1) and dosage-sensitive sex reversal adrenal hypoplasia congenita critical region on the X chromosome gene 1 (DAX-1), nuclear receptor superfamily members involved in the regulation of steroidogenesis, was shown in stromal cells in OC. Enzymes involved in ovarian steroidogenesis, including steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), P450 side chain cleavage enzyme (P450scc), and 3-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3b-HSD) were detected in the stromal cell cytoplasm (102). Stromal protein expression of PPAR-β, another nuclear receptor superfamily member, was reduced in OC compared to borderline tumors, benign tumors, and normal ovaries, whereas expression of its target protein 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDK1) was limited to epithelial cells and increased in OC (103).
Other Molecules
Various molecules related to other biological pathways have been localized to the OC stroma and are discussed in this section.
Immune Response Effectors
Several studies have investigated the expression of molecules related to the immune response in OC stromal cells. Proteins reported to be expressed by stromal cells include IL-11 receptor (104), the pro-inflammatory peptide LL-37 and its precursor human cationic antimicrobial protein-18 [hCAP-18; (105)], lymphotoxin-β receptor and the chemokine CXCL11 (106), and CD277 (107), as well as IL-6, COX-2, and CXCL1 (108). The clinical role of these biomarkers in this cellular compartment remains to be established.
IL-1β was recently reported to suppress nuclear p53 expression in CAF. High IL-1β and its receptor IL-1R1 and low p53 expression in CAF were associated with poor OS. p53 knockdown in ovarian fibroblasts resulted in increased expression and secretion of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, VEGF, and growth-regulated oncogene-α (GRO-α) and increased tumor growth in vivo in a NF-κB-dependent manner (109). Induction of senescence in fibroblasts by GRO-α was previously reported to mediate tumor promotion in a previous study by the same group (110).
Ribonuclease-2 (RNASET2), an extracellular RNase expressed in the OC stroma, was shown to mediate recruitment of macrophages to the tumor microenvironment and its silencing enhanced tumor growth of OVCAR-3 cells in vivo. Genes altered following RNASET2 silencing were involved in pathways related to the immune response and cell adhesion (111).
Cell Cycle and Apoptosis-Related Proteins
Protein expression of the cell cycle inhibitor p16 in stromal cells was reported to be associated with improved prognosis, whereas the presence of this protein in tumor cells was a poor prognostic marker (112). Stromal expression of another cell cycle inhibitor, p27, was significantly reduced in OC compared to normal ovaries, as was the expression of lung resistance protein (LRP), a protein associated with multidrug resistance (MDR), whereas multidrug resistance protein (MRP) expression was not significantly different (113). Expression of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and the death receptors DR4, DR5, and DcR1 was found in OC stromal cells (114). TRAIL was detected in the OC stroma in an additional study (115).
Various Molecules
The RNA-binding protein HuR and COX-2 were expressed in the OC stroma in 24 and 7% of specimens in a study of mucinous OC, with no clinical role observed for expression in this cellular compartment (116). Analysis of proteins related to the prostaglandin synthesis pathway using IHC showed expression of COX-2, microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-I (mPGES-I), and the prostaglandin E2 receptors EP1 and EP2 to the OC stroma, particularly in tumors of higher histological grade (117).
Expression of the α, β, and π sub-types of the detoxification enzyme glutathione S-transferase was observed in the stroma of OC specimens and different benign tumors (118).
Somatostatin and its receptors sst1, sst2, sst3, and sst5 were expressed with variable frequency in OC tumor cells and in their surrounding stroma, as well as in the stroma of different benign conditions. Somatostatin was significantly co-expressed with sst1, sst2, and sst5 in the stromal compartment in analysis of the entire cohort (119).
The serotonin receptors 5-HT1A, 5-HTA2, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT4 were expressed, to variable extent, in the stroma of normal ovaries, benign ovarian tumors, borderline tumors, and OC specimens, with 5-HT2B being the most expressed receptor (120).
Retinoic acid receptor-α was found in stromal fibroblasts, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and OC cells in analysis of 16 tumors of serous or mixed histology (121).
Neural endopeptidase (CD10) was expressed in the stroma of serous borderline tumors and in OC of different histotype, whereas no staining was observed in mucinous borderline tumors, in benign tumors, and in normal ovaries (122).
Luteinizing hormone receptor mRNA expression analysis by RT-PCR and ISH was reduced in both tumor cells and the OC stroma compared to benign tumors, with intermediate levels for borderline tumors. Expression in grade 2–3 tumors was less frequent then in their grade 1 counterparts, and the receptor was absent in five analyzed metastases (123).
The expression of six different isozymes of aldehyde dehydrogenase, an enzyme implicated in stem cell biology in OC, was investigated in normal ovaries, adenomas, borderline tumors, and OC specimens. Stromal and tumor cell expression of several isozymes was found to differ between normal tissue and ovarian tumors, as well as between OC of different histotype (124).
Expression of class III β-tubulin was reduced, though not significantly, in the OC stroma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in analysis of 22 paired tumors obtained pre- and post-chemotherapy. Tumor and stromal class III β-tubulin expression was associated with poor OS (125).
Graphical illustration linking molecules known to have biological association, including HA, bFGF, MMP members, uPA, ETS transcription factors, HuR, and HOXA is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Biologically linked cancer-associated molecules in ovarian carcinoma cells and the tumor stroma. Graphical illustration linking molecules known to have biological association in this cancer, including hyaluronic acid (HA), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), urinary-type plasminogen activator, ETS transcription factors, HuR, and HOXA.
Concluding Comments
Ovarian carcinoma is a highly lethal cancer characterized by considerable heterogeneity across different histological sub-types, as well as within the same morphological entity. In order to achieve noticeable improvement in the outcome of this disease, better understanding of the microenvironment of this tumor at both the primary site and metastatic locations is critically in need.
The above-discussed papers provide compelling evidence regarding the synthetic capacity of CAF in OC and emphasize the cross-talk between tumor cells and the stromal compartment; the latter interaction recently demonstrated in vitro (126). They additionally highlight the fact that the clinical relevance of a given molecule may be different or even opposite when expressed in carcinoma cells or in stromal cells. Nevertheless, many of these studies constitute single reports of the expression and clinical role of a given molecule, which need to be confirmed in series from other institutions, preferably studies in which each of the histological types of OC is studied separately.
Recent studies have applied high-throughput technology to the identification of central regulatory pathways in OC fibroblasts, often following microdissection, which allows for analyses focused on the target cell population. Qiu et al. studied genome-wide copy number and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in CAF isolated from 25 OC and 10 breast carcinoma samples using SNP arrays. LOH and copy number alterations were rarely observed (127). Microarray analysis of microdissected stroma from 24 OC identified 52 candidate genes related to PFS, of which early growth response 1 (EGR1) and FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (FOSB) were validated in an independent series of 50 tumors and found to be independent prognostic markers of poor PFS (128).
The role of miRNAs in reprograming of normal fibroblasts into CAF through downregulation of miR-31 and miR-214 and upregulation of miR-155 was recently shown, and the chemokine CCL5 was identified as target of miR-214, suggesting a role in modulation of the tumor microenvironment (129).
Exosomes are 30–100 nm lipoprotein vesicles containing proteins, mRNAs, and miRNAs that are secreted from cells and present in most circulating body fluids (130). Exosomes from SKOV-3 and OVCAR-3 cells induced adipose tissue-derived stem cells to acquire characteristics of myofibroblasts, with activation of the TGF-β pathway (131).
Lili et al. studied the stroma of 45 OC by microarray analysis and found two distinct signatures for the stromal compartment, characterized by different pairs of receptors and ligands (132).
Many of the molecules discussed in this review are expressed by both tumor and stromal cells and thereby present the possibility to target both cellular components in order to maximize the tumor-suppressive effect. While clinical studies aimed at inhibiting some of these cellular targets, e.g., proteases and COX-2, have been largely disappointing, other pathways, particularly receptor tyrosine kinase-driven pathways mediating angiogenesis and other tumor-related processes, are highly relevant (133, 134).
Therapeutic approaches are likely to focus to a larger extent on the tumor stroma in the future, as in the recent study by McCann and co-workers, in which inhibition of Gli1, part of the Hedgehog pathway, using the cyclopamine derivative IPI-926 in combination with chemotherapy was assessed (135). Whether such approaches could change the clinical course of OC is yet to be determined.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
Studies by the authors of this review were supported by the Inger and John Fredriksen Foundation for Ovarian Cancer Research. Reuven Reich is affiliated with the David R. Bloom Center for Pharmacy and the Adolf and Klara Brettler Center for Research in Molecular Pharmacology and Therapeutics at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
References
1. Polanska UM, Orimo A. Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts: non-neoplastic tumour-promoting mesenchymal cells. J Cell Physiol (2013) 228:1651–7. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24347
2. Marsh T, Pietras K, McAllister SS. Fibroblasts as architects of cancer pathogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta (2013) 1832:1070–8. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.10.013
3. Karagiannis GS, Poutahidis T, Erdman SE, Kirsch R, Riddell RH, Diamandis EP. Cancer-associated fibroblasts drive the progression of metastasis through both paracrine and mechanical pressure on cancer tissue. Mol Cancer Res (2012) 10:1403–18. doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0307
4. Fang H, Declerck YA. Targeting the tumor microenvironment: from understanding pathways to effective clinical trials. Cancer Res (2013) 73:4965–77. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0661
5. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin (2012) 62:10–29. doi:10.3322/caac.21149
6. Prat J. Ovarian carcinomas: five distinct diseases with different origins, genetic alterations, and clinicopathological features. Virchows Arch (2012) 460:237–49. doi:10.1007/s00428-012-1203-5
7. Hennessy BT, Coleman RL, Markman M. Ovarian cancer. Lancet (2009) 374:1371–82. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61338-6
8. Labiche A, Heutte N, Herlin P, Chasle J, Gauduchon P, Elie N. Stromal compartment as a survival prognostic factor in advanced ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer (2010) 20:28–33. doi:10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181bda1cb
9. Egeblad M, Werb Z. New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer (2002) 2:161–74. doi:10.1038/nrc745
10. Bjorklund M, Koivunen E. Gelatinase-mediated migration and invasion of cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta (2005) 1755:37–69. doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2005.03.001
11. Bauvois B. New facets of matrix metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MMP-9 as cell surface transducers: outside-in signaling and relationship to tumor progression. Biochim Biophys Acta (2012) 1825:29–36. doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2011.10.001
12. Boyd RS, Balkwill FR. MMP-2 release and activation in ovarian carcinoma: the role of fibroblasts. Br J Cancer (1999) 80:315–21. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6690357
13. Huang S, Van Arsdall M, Tedjarati S, McCarty M, Wu W, Langley R, et al. Contributions of stromal metalloproteinase-9 to angiogenesis and growth of human ovarian carcinoma in mice. J Natl Cancer Inst (2002) 94:1134–42. doi:10.1093/jnci/94.15.1134
14. Drew AF, Blick TJ, Lafleur MA, Tim EL, Robbie MJ, Rice GE, et al. Correlation of tumor- and stromal-derived MT1-MMP expression with progression of human ovarian tumors in SCID mice. Gynecol Oncol (2004) 95:437–48. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.08.032
15. Autio-Harmainen H, Karttunen T, Hurskainen T, Höyhtyä M, Kauppila A, Tryggvason K. Expression of 72 kilodalton type IV collagenase (gelatinase A) in benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Lab Invest (1993) 69:312–21.
16. Naylor MS, Stamp GW, Davies BD, Balkwill FR. Expression and activity of MMPS and their regulators in ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer (1994) 58:50–6. doi:10.1002/ijc.2910580110
17. Afzal S, Lalani N, Foulkes WD, Boyce B, Tickle S, Cardillo MR, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 expression and synthetic matrix metalloproteinase-2 inhibitor binding in ovarian carcinomas and tumor cell lines. Lab Invest (1996) 74:406–21.
18. Afzal S, Lalani EN, Poulsom R, Stubbs A, Rowlinson G, Sato H, et al. MT1-MMP and MMP-2 mRNA expression in human ovarian tumors: possible implications for the role of desmoplastic fibroblasts. Hum Pathol (1998) 29:155–65. doi:10.1016/S0046-8177(98)90226-X
19. Davidson B, Goldberg I, Gotlieb WH, Kopolovic J, Ben-Baruch G, Nesland JM, et al. High levels of MMP-2, MMP-9, MT1-MMP and TIMP-2 mRNA correlate with poor survival in ovarian carcinoma. Clin Exp Metastasis (1999) 17:799–808. doi:10.1023/A:1006723011835
20. Westerlund A, Apaja-Sarkkinen M, Höyhtyä M, Puistola U, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T. Gelatinase A-immunoreactive protein in ovarian lesions – prognostic value in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol (1999) 75:91–8. doi:10.1006/gyno.1999.5533
21. Huang LW, Garrett AP, Bell DA, Welch WR, Berkowitz RS, Mok SC. Differential expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 protein and mRNA in epithelial ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol (2000) 77:369–76. doi:10.1006/gyno.2000.5806
22. Behrens P, Rothe M, Florin A, Wellmann A, Wernert N. Invasive properties of serous human epithelial ovarian tumors are related to Ets-1, MMP-1 and MMP-9 expression. Int J Mol Med (2001) 8:149–54. doi:10.3892/ijmm.8.2.149
23. Davidson B, Reich R, Berner A, Givant-Horwitz V, Goldberg I, Risberg B, et al. Ovarian carcinoma cells in serous effusions show altered MMP-2 and TIMP-2 mRNA levels. Eur J Cancer (2001) 37:2040–9. doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00235-0
24. Furuya M, Ishikura H, Nemori R, Shibata M, Fujimoto S, Yoshiki T. Clarification of the active gelatinolytic sites in human ovarian neoplasms using in situ zymography. Hum Pathol (2001) 32:163–8. doi:10.1053/hupa.2001.21558
25. Wu X, Li H, Kang L, Li L, Wang W, Shan B. Activated matrix metalloproteinase-2 – a potential marker of prognosis for epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol (2002) 84:126–34. doi:10.1006/gyno.2001.6477
26. Okamoto T, Niu R, Yamada S. Increased expression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Mol Hum Reprod (2003) 9:569–75. doi:10.1093/molehr/gag074
27. Torng PL, Mao TL, Chan WY, Huang SC, Lin CT. Prognostic significance of stromal metalloproteinase-2 in ovarian adenocarcinoma and its relation to carcinoma progression. Gynecol Oncol (2004) 92:559–67. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.11.011
28. Kamat AA, Fletcher M, Gruman LM, Mueller P, Lopez A, Landen CN Jr, et al. The clinical relevance of stromal matrix metalloproteinase expression in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2006) 12:1707–14. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2338
29. Lin YG, Han LY, Kamat AA, Merritt WM, Landen CN, Deavers MT, et al. EphA2 overexpression is associated with angiogenesis in ovarian cancer. Cancer (2007) 109:332–40. doi:10.1002/cncr.22415
30. Sillanpää S, Anttila M, Suhonen K, Hämäläinen K, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T, Puistola U, et al. Prognostic significance of extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer and matrix metalloproteinase 2 in epithelial ovarian cancer. Tumour Biol (2007) 28:280–9. doi:10.1159/000110426
31. Sillanpää S, Anttila M, Voutilainen K, Ropponen K, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T, Puistola U, et al. Prognostic significance of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol (2007) 104:296–303. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.09.004
32. Périgny M, Bairati I, Harvey I, Beauchemin M, Harel F, Plante M, et al. Role of immunohistochemical overexpression of matrix metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MMP-11 in the prognosis of death by ovarian cancer. Am J Clin Pathol (2008) 129:226–31. doi:10.1309/49LA9XCBGWJ8F2KM
33. Hałon A, Nowak-Markwitz E, Donizy P, Matkowski R, Maciejczyk A, Gansukh T, et al. Enhanced immunoreactivity of TIMP-2 in the stromal compartment of tumor as a marker of favorable prognosis in ovarian cancer patients. J Histochem Cytochem (2012) 60:491–501. doi:10.1369/0022155412446978
34. Brun JL, Cortez A, Lesieur B, Uzan S, Rouzier R, Daraï E. Expression of MMP-2, -7, -9, MT1-MMP and TIMP-1 and -2 has no prognostic relevance in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncol Rep (2012) 27:1049–57. doi:10.3892/or.2011.1608
35. Grelewski PG, Bar JK. The role of p53 protein and MMP-2 tumor/stromal cells expression on progressive growth of ovarian neoplasms. Cancer Invest (2013) 31:472–9. doi:10.3109/07357907.2013.820320
36. Davidson B, Goldberg I, Berner A, Kristensen GB, Reich R. EMMPRIN (extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer) is a novel marker of poor outcome in serous ovarian carcinoma. Clin Exp Metastasis (2003) 20:161–9. doi:10.1023/A:1022696012668
37. Chen H, Wang L, Beretov J, Hao J, Xiao W, Li Y. Co-expression of CD147/EMMPRIN with monocarboxylate transporters and multiple drug resistance proteins is associated with epithelial ovarian cancer progression. Clin Exp Metastasis (2010) 27:557–69. doi:10.1007/s10585-010-9345-9
38. Blasi F, Carmeliet P. uPAR: a versatile signalling orchestrator. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2002) 3:932–42. doi:10.1038/nrm977
39. Duffy MJ, Duggan C. The urokinase plasminogen activator system: a rich source of tumour markers for the individualized management of patients with cancer. Clin Biochem (2004) 37:541–8. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.05.013
40. Borgfeldt C, Casslén B, Liu CL, Hansson S, Lecander I, Astedt B. High tissue content of urokinase plasminogen activator (u-PA) is associated with high stromal expression of u-PA mRNA in poorly differentiated serous ovarian carcinoma. Int J Cancer (1998) 79:588–95. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19981218)79:6<588::AID-IJC6>3.0.CO;2-W
41. Borgfeldt C, Hansson SR, Gustavsson B, Måsbäck A, Casslén B. Dedifferentiation of serous ovarian cancer from cystic to solid tumors is associated with increased expression of mRNA for urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), its receptor (uPAR) and its inhibitor (PAI-1). Int J Cancer (2001) 92:497–502. doi:10.1002/ijc.1215
42. Wang L, Madigan MC, Chen H, Liu F, Patterson KI, Beretov J, et al. Expression of urokinase plasminogen activator and its receptor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol (2009) 114:265–72. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.04.031
43. Al-Hassan NN, Behzadian A, Caldwell R, Ivanova VS, Syed V, Motamed K, et al. Differential roles of uPAR in peritoneal ovarian carcinomatosis. Neoplasia (2012) 14:259–70. doi:10.1593/neo.12442
44. Steffan JJ, Koul HK. Prostate derived ETS factor (PDEF): a putative tumor metastasis suppressor. Cancer Lett (2011) 310:109–17. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2011.06.011
45. Davidson B, Reich R, Goldberg I, Gotlieb WH, Kopolovic J, Berner A, et al. Ets-1 mRNA expression is a novel marker of poor survival in ovarian carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res (2001) 7:551–7.
46. Davidson B, Goldberg I, Gotlieb WH, Kopolovic J, Ben-Baruch G, Reich R. PEA3 is the second Ets family transcription factor involved in tumor progression in ovarian carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res (2003) 9:1412–9.
47. Ferrandina G, Scambia G, Fagotti A, D’Agostino G, Benedetti Panici P, Carbone A, et al. Immunoradiometric and immunohistochemical analysis of cathepsin D in ovarian cancer: lack of association with clinical outcome. Br J Cancer (1998) 78:1645–52. doi:10.1038/bjc.1998.737
48. Baekelandt M, Holm R, Tropé CG, Nesland JM, Kristensen GB. The significance of metastasis-related factors cathepsin-D and nm23 in advanced ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol (1999) 10:1335–41. doi:10.1023/A:1008352502465
49. Lösch A, Schindl M, Kohlberger P, Lahodny J, Breitenecker G, Horvat R, et al. Cathepsin D in ovarian cancer: prognostic value and correlation with p53 expression and microvessel density. Gynecol Oncol (2004) 92:545–52. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.11.016
50. Nishikawa H, Ozaki Y, Nakanishi T, Blomgren K, Tada T, Arakawa A, et al. The role of cathepsin B and cystatin C in the mechanisms of invasion by ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol (2004) 92:881–6. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.11.017
51. Davidson B, Xi Z, Klokk TI, Tropé CG, Dørum A, Scheistrøen M, et al. Kallikrein 4 expression is up-regulated in epithelial ovarian carcinoma cells in effusions. Am J Clin Pathol (2005) 123:360–8. doi:10.1309/PTBB5BPCKX8K9V69
52. Kauppila S, Saarela J, Stenbäck F, Risteli J, Kauppila A, Risteli L. Expression of mRNAs for type I and type III procollagens in serous ovarian cystadenomas and cystadenocarcinomas. Am J Pathol (1996) 148:539–48.
53. Zhu GG, Risteli L, Mäkinen M, Risteli J, Kauppila A, Stenbäck F. Immunohistochemical study of type I collagen and type I pN-collagen in benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms. Cancer (1995) 75:1010–7. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19950215)75:4<1010::AID-CNCR2820750417>3.0.CO;2-O
54. Menzin AW, Loret de Mola JR, Bilker WB, Wheeler JE, Rubin SC, Feinberg RF. Identification of oncofetal fibronectin in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: detection in ascitic fluid and localization to primary sites and metastatic implants. Cancer (1998) 82:152–8. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980101)82:1<152::AID-CNCR19>3.0.CO;2-1
55. Roger P, Pujol P, Lucas A, Baldet P, Rochefort H. Increased immunostaining of fibulin-1, an estrogen-regulated protein in the stroma of human ovarian epithelial tumors. Am J Pathol (1998) 153:1579–88. doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65746-X
56. Okuma E, Ohishi Y, Oda Y, Aishima S, Kurihara S, Nishimura I, et al. Cytoplasmic and stromal expression of laminin γ 2 chain correlates with infiltrative invasion in ovarian mucinous neoplasms of gastro-intestinal type. Oncol Rep (2010) 24:1569–76. doi:10.3892/or_00001019
57. Kato N, Motoyama T. Relation between laminin-5 gamma 2 chain and cell surface metalloproteinase MT1-MMP in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Int J Gynecol Pathol (2009) 28:49–54. doi:10.1097/PGP.0b013e3181808021
58. van den Brûle F, Califice S, Garnier F, Fernandez PL, Berchuck A, Castronovo V. Galectin-1 accumulation in the ovary carcinoma peritumoral stroma is induced by ovary carcinoma cells and affects both cancer cell proliferation and adhesion to laminin-1 and fibronectin. Lab Invest (2003) 83:377–86. doi:10.1097/01.LAB.0000059949.01480.40
59. Givant-Horwitz V, Davidson B, van de Putte G, Dong HP, Goldberg I, Amir S, et al. Expression of the 67 kDa laminin receptor and the alpha6 integrin subunit in serous ovarian carcinoma. Clin Exp Metastasis (2003) 20:599–609. doi:10.1023/A:1027340208536
60. Goldberg I, Davidson B, Reich R, Gotlieb WH, Ben-Baruch G, Bryne M, et al. Alphav integrin expression is a novel marker of poor prognosis in advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res (2001) 7:4073–9.
61. Davidson B, Goldberg I, Reich R, Tell L, Dong HP, Trope CG, et al. AlphaV- and beta1-integrin subunits are commonly expressed in malignant effusions from ovarian carcinoma patients. Gynecol Oncol (2003) 90:248–57. doi:10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00321-4
62. Davidson B, Goldberg I, Kopolovic J, Gotlieb WH, Givant-Horwitz V, Nesland JM, et al. Expression of angiogenesis-related genes in ovarian carcinoma – a clinicopathologic study. Clin Exp Metastasis (2000) 18:501–7. doi:10.1023/A:1011858225144
63. Davidson B, Reich R, Kopolovic J, Berner A, Nesland JM, Kristensen GB, et al. Interleukin-8 and vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA and protein levels are down-regulated in ovarian carcinoma cells in serous effusions. Clin Exp Metastasis (2002) 19:135–44. doi:10.1023/A:1014582911680
64. Ivarsson K, Ekerydh A, Fyhr IM, Janson PO, Brännström M. Upregulation of interleukin-8 and polarized epithelial expression of interleukin-8 receptor A in ovarian carcinomas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand (2000) 79:777–84. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.079009777.x
65. Valve E, Martikainen P, Seppänen J, Oksjoki S, Hinkka S, Anttila L, et al. Expression of fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-8 isoforms and FGF receptors in human ovarian tumors. Int J Cancer (2000) 88:718–25. doi:10.1002/1097-0215(20001201)88:5<718::AID-IJC6>3.0.CO;2-F
66. Sironen RK, Tammi M, Tammi R, Auvinen PK, Anttila M, Kosma VM. Hyaluronan in human malignancies. Exp Cell Res (2011) 317:383–91. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.11.017
67. Afify AM, Ferguson AW, Davila RM, Werness BA. Expression of CD44S and CD44v5 is more common in stage III than in stage I serous ovarian carcinomas. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol (2001) 9:309–14. doi:10.1097/00022744-200112000-00004
68. Anttila MA, Tammi RH, Tammi MI, Syrjänen KJ, Saarikoski SV, Kosma VM. High levels of stromal hyaluronan predict poor disease outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Res (2000) 60:150–5.
69. Tuhkanen H, Anttila M, Kosma VM, Ylä-Herttuala S, Heinonen S, Kuronen A, et al. Genetic alterations in the peritumoral stromal cells of malignant and borderline epithelial ovarian tumors as indicated by allelic imbalance on chromosome 3p. Int J Cancer (2004) 109:247–52. doi:10.1002/ijc.11733
70. Kato N, Takeda J, Fukase M, Motoyama T. Alternate mucoid and hyalinized stroma in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: manifestation of serial stromal remodeling. Mod Pathol (2010) 23:881–8. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2010.75
71. Kato N, Takeda J, Fukase M, Motoyama T. Hyalinized stroma in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: how is it formed? Hum Pathol (2012) 43:2041–6. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2012.02.012
72. Iozzo RV, Sanderson RD. Proteoglycans in cancer biology, tumour microenvironment and angiogenesis. J Cell Mol Med (2011) 15:1013–31. doi:10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01236.x
73. Couchman JR, Pataki CA. An introduction to proteoglycans and their localization. J Histochem Cytochem (2012) 60:885–97. doi:10.1369/0022155412464638
74. Davies EJ, Blackhall FH, Shanks JH, David G, McGown AT, Swindell R, et al. Distribution and clinical significance of heparan sulfate proteoglycans in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2004) 10:5178–86. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0103
75. Kusumoto T, Kodama J, Seki N, Nakamura K, Hongo A, Hiramatsu Y. Clinical significance of syndecan-1 and versican expression in human epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncol Rep (2010) 23:917–25. doi:10.3892/or_00000715
76. Ghosh S, Albitar L, LeBaron R, Welch WR, Samimi G, Birrer MJ, et al. Up-regulation of stromal versican expression in advanced stage serous ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol (2010) 119:114–20. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.05.029
77. Voutilainen K, Anttila M, Sillanpää S, Tammi R, Tammi M, Saarikoski S, et al. Versican in epithelial ovarian cancer: relation to hyaluronan, clinicopathologic factors and prognosis. Int J Cancer (2003) 107:359–64. doi:10.1002/ijc.11423
78. Nash MA, Deavers MT, Freedman RS. The expression of decorin in human ovarian tumors. Clin Cancer Res (2002) 8:1754–60.
79. Choi KU, Yun JS, Lee IH, Heo SC, Shin SH, Jeon ES, et al. Lysophosphatidic acid-induced expression of periostin in stromal cells: prognostic relevance of periostin expression in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer (2011) 128:332–42. doi:10.1002/ijc.25341
80. Smith AL, Robin TP, Ford HL. Molecular pathways: targeting the TGF-β pathway for cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res (2012) 18:4514–21. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3224
81. Higashi T, Sasagawa T, Inoue M, Oka R, Shuangying L, Saijoh K. Overexpression of latent transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) binding protein 1 (LTBP-1) in association with TGF-beta 1 in ovarian carcinoma. Jpn J Cancer Res (2001) 92:506–15. doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2001.tb01123.x
82. Yeung TL, Leung CS, Wong KK, Samimi G, Thompson MS, Liu J, et al. TGF-β modulates ovarian cancer invasion by upregulating CAF-derived versican in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res (2013) 73:5016–28. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0023
83. Yao Q, Qu X, Yang Q, Wei M, Kong B. CLIC4 mediates TGF-beta1-induced fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation in ovarian cancer. Oncol Rep (2009) 22:541–8. doi:10.3892/or_00000469
84. Bristow RE, Baldwin RL, Yamada SD, Korc M, Karlan BY. Altered expression of transforming growth factor-beta ligands and receptors in primary and recurrent ovarian carcinoma. Cancer (1999) 85:658–68. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990201)85:3<658::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO;2-M
85. Do TV, Kubba LA, Antenos M, Rademaker AW, Sturgis CD, Woodruff TK. The role of activin A and Akt/GSK signaling in ovarian tumor biology. Endocrinology (2008) 149:3809–16. doi:10.1210/en.2007-1584
86. Brown TJ, Shaw PA, Karp X, Huynh MH, Begley H, Ringuette MJ. Activation of SPARC expression in reactive stroma associated with human epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol (1999) 75:25–33. doi:10.1006/gyno.1999.5552
87. Paley PJ, Goff BA, Gown AM, Greer BE, Sage EH. Alterations in SPARC and VEGF immunoreactivity in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol (2000) 78:336–41. doi:10.1006/gyno.2000.5894
88. Moraitis S, Miller WR, Smyth JF, Langdon SP. Paracrine regulation of ovarian cancer by endothelin. Eur J Cancer (1999) 35:1381–7. doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00131-8
89. Madsen CV, Dahl Steffensen K, Waldstrøm M, Jakobsen A. Immunohistochemical expression of platelet-derived growth factor receptors in ovarian cancer patients with long-term follow-up. Patholog Res Int (2012) 2012:851432. doi:10.1155/2012/851432
90. Jones MB, Michener CM, Blanchette JO, Kuznetsov VA, Raffeld M, Serrero G, et al. The granulin-epithelin precursor/PC-cell-derived growth factor is a growth factor for epithelial ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2003) 9:44–51.
91. Davidson B, Alejandro E, Flørenes VA, Goderstad JM, Risberg B, Kristensen GB, et al. Granulin-epithelin precursor is a novel prognostic marker in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Cancer (2004) 100:2139–47. doi:10.1002/cncr.20219
92. Weigang B, Nap M, Bittl A, Jaeger W. Immunohistochemical localization of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptors in benign and malignant tissues of the female genital tract. Tumour Biol (1994) 15:236–46. doi:10.1159/000217897
93. Grier DG, Thompson A, Kwasniewska A, McGonigle GJ, Halliday HL, Lappin TR. The pathophysiology of HOX genes and their role in cancer. J Pathol (2005) 205:154–71. doi:10.1002/path.1710
94. Shah N, Sukumar S. The Hox genes and their roles in oncogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer (2010) 10:361–71. doi:10.1038/nrc2826
95. Ota T, Gilks CB, Longacre T, Leung PC, Auersperg N. HOXA7 in epithelial ovarian cancer: interrelationships between differentiation and clinical features. Reprod Sci (2007) 14:605–14. doi:10.1177/1933719107307781
96. Ko SY, Barengo N, Ladanyi A, Lee JS, Marini F, Lengyel E, et al. HOXA9 promotes ovarian cancer growth by stimulating cancer-associated fibroblasts. J Clin Invest (2012) 122:3603–17. doi:10.1172/JCI62229
97. Ko SY, Lengyel E, Naora H. The Müllerian HOXA10 gene promotes growth of ovarian surface epithelial cells by stimulating epithelial-stromal interactions. Mol Cell Endocrinol (2010) 317:112–9. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2009.12.025
98. Chekerov R, Klaman I, Zafrakas M, Könsgen D, Mustea A, Petschke B, et al. Altered expression pattern of topoisomerase IIalpha in ovarian tumor epithelial and stromal cells after platinum-based chemotherapy. Neoplasia (2006) 8:38–45. doi:10.1593/neo.05580
99. Gambaro K, Quinn MC, Wojnarowicz PM, Arcand SL, de Ladurantaye M, Barrès V, et al. VGLL3 expression is associated with a tumor suppressor phenotype in epithelial ovarian cancer. Mol Oncol (2013) 7:513–30. doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2012.12.006
100. Tuhkanen H, Soini Y, Kosma VM, Anttila M, Sironen R, Hämäläinen K, et al. Nuclear expression of Snail1 in borderline and malignant epithelial ovarian tumours is associated with tumour progression. BMC Cancer (2009) 9:289. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-9-289
101. Sundfeldt K, Ivarsson K, Carlsson M, Enerbäck S, Janson PO, Brännström M, et al. The expression of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) in the human ovary in vivo: specific increase in C/EBPbeta during epithelial tumour progression. Br J Cancer (1999) 79:1240–8. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6690199
102. Abd-Elaziz M, Moriya T, Akahira J, Nakamura Y, Suzuki T, Sasano H. Immunolocalization of nuclear transcription factors, DAX-1 and Ad4BP/SF-1, in human common epithelial ovarian tumors: correlations with StAR and steroidogenic enzymes in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol (2005) 24:153–63. doi:10.1097/01.pgp.0000155075.75209.42
103. Ahmed N, Riley C, Quinn MA. An immunohistochemical perspective of PPAR beta and one of its putative targets PDK1 in normal ovaries, benign and malignant ovarian tumours. Br J Cancer (2008) 98:1415–24. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604306
104. Campbell CL, Guardiani R, Ollari C, Nelson BE, Quesenberry PJ, Savarese TM. Interleukin-11 receptor expression in primary ovarian carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol (2001) 80:121–7. doi:10.1006/gyno.2000.6064
105. Coffelt SB, Waterman RS, Florez L, Höner zu Bentrup K, Zwezdaryk KJ, Tomchuck SL, et al. Ovarian cancers overexpress the antimicrobial protein hCAP-18 and its derivative LL-37 increases ovarian cancer cell proliferation and invasion. Int J Cancer (2008) 122:1030–9. doi:10.1002/ijc.23186
106. Lau TS, Chung TK, Cheung TH, Chan LK, Cheung LW, Yim SF, et al. Cancer cell-derived lymphotoxin mediates reciprocal tumour-stromal interactions in human ovarian cancer by inducing CXCL11 in fibroblasts. J Pathol (2014) 232:43–56. doi:10.1002/path.4258
107. Cubillos-Ruiz JR, Martinez D, Scarlett UK, Rutkowski MR, Nesbeth YC, Camposeco-Jacobs AL, et al. CD277 is a negative co-stimulatory molecule universally expressed by ovarian cancer microenvironmental cells. Oncotarget (2010) 1:329–38.
108. Erez N, Glanz S, Raz Y, Avivi C, Barshack I. Cancer associated fibroblasts express pro-inflammatory factors in human breast and ovarian tumors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2013) 437:397–402. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.06.089
109. Schauer IG, Zhang J, Xing Z, Guo X, Mercado-Uribe I, Sood AK, et al. Interleukin-1β promotes ovarian tumorigenesis through a p53/NF-κB-mediated inflammatory response in stromal fibroblasts. Neoplasia (2013) 15:409–20. doi:10.1593/neo.121228
110. Yang G, Rosen DG, Zhang Z, Bast RC Jr, Mills GB, Colacino JA, et al. The chemokine growth-regulated oncogene 1 (Gro-1) links RAS signaling to the senescence of stromal fibroblasts and ovarian tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2006) 103:16472–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605752103
111. Acquati F, Lualdi M, Bertilaccio S, Monti L, Turconi G, Fabbri M, et al. Loss of function of ribonuclease T2, an ancient and phylogenetically conserved RNase, plays a crucial role in ovarian tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2013) 110:8140–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.1222079110
112. Dong Y, Walsh MD, McGuckin MA, Gabrielli BG, Cummings MC, Wright RG, et al. Increased expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2 (CDKN2A) gene product P16INK4A in ovarian cancer is associated with progression and unfavourable prognosis. Int J Cancer (1997) 74:57–63. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970220)74:1<57::AID-IJC10>3.0.CO;2-F
113. Goff BA, Paley PJ, Greer BE, Gown AM. Evaluation of chemoresistance markers in women with epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol (2001) 81:18–24. doi:10.1006/gyno.2000.6105
114. Arts HJ, de Jong S, Hollema H, ten Hoor K, van der Zee AG, de Vries EG. Chemotherapy induces death receptor 5 in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol (2004) 92:794–800. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.11.054
115. Horak P, Pils D, Kaider A, Pinter A, Elandt K, Sax C, et al. Perturbation of the tumor necrosis factor – related apoptosis-inducing ligand cascade in ovarian cancer: overexpression of FLIPL and deregulation of the functional receptors DR4 and DR5. Clin Cancer Res (2005) 11:8585–91. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1276
116. Erkinheimo TL, Sivula A, Lassus H, Heinonen M, Furneaux H, Haglund C, et al. Cytoplasmic HuR expression correlates with epithelial cancer cell but not with stromal cell cyclooxygenase-2 expression in mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol (2005) 99:14–9. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.04.047
117. Rask K, Zhu Y, Wang W, Hedin L, Sundfeldt K. Ovarian epithelial cancer: a role for PGE2-synthesis and signalling in malignant transformation and progression. Mol Cancer (2006) 5:62. doi:10.1186/1476-4598-5-62
118. Green JA, Robertson LJ, Clark AH. Glutathione S-transferase expression in benign and malignant ovarian tumours. Br J Cancer (1993) 68:235–9. doi:10.1038/bjc.1993.321
119. Hall GH, Turnbull LW, Richmond I, Helboe L, Atkin SL. Localisation of somatostatin and somatostatin receptors in benign and malignant ovarian tumours. Br J Cancer (2002) 87:86–90. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600284
120. Henriksen R, Dizeyi N, Abrahamsson PA. Expression of serotonin receptors 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, 5-HT2B and 5-HT4 in ovary and in ovarian tumours. Anticancer Res (2012) 32:1361–6.
121. Katsetos CD, Stadnicka I, Boyd JC, Ehya H, Zheng S, Soprano CM, et al. Cellular distribution of retinoic acid receptor-alpha protein in serous adenocarcinomas of ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal origin: comparison with estrogen receptor status. Am J Pathol (1998) 153:469–80. doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65590-3
122. Khin EE, Kikkawa F, Ino K, Suzuki T, Shibata K, Kajiyama H, et al. Neutral endopeptidase/CD10 expression in the stroma of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol (2003) 22:175–80. doi:10.1097/00004347-200304000-00010
123. Lu JJ, Zheng Y, Kang X, Yuan JM, Lauchlan SC, Pike MC, et al. Decreased luteinizing hormone receptor mRNA expression in human ovarian epithelial cancer. Gynecol Oncol (2000) 79:158–68. doi:10.1006/gyno.2000.5928
124. Saw YT, Yang J, Ng SK, Liu S, Singh S, Singh M, et al. Characterization of aldehyde dehydrogenase isozymes in ovarian cancer tissues and sphere cultures. BMC Cancer (2012) 12:329. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-12-329
125. Roque DM, Buza N, Glasgow M, Bellone S, Bortolomai I, Gasparrini S, et al. Class III β-tubulin overexpression within the tumor microenvironment is a prognostic biomarker for poor overall survival in ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel. Clin Exp Metastasis (2014) 31:101–10. doi:10.1007/s10585-013-9614-5
126. Fu S, Dong L, Sun W, Xu Y, Gao L, Miao Y. Stromal-epithelial crosstalk provides a suitable microenvironment for the progression of ovarian cancer cells in vitro. Cancer Invest (2013) 31:616–24. doi:10.3109/07357907.2013.849723
127. Qiu W, Hu M, Sridhar A, Opeskin K, Fox S, Shipitsin M, et al. No evidence of clonal somatic genetic alterations in cancer-associated fibroblasts from human breast and ovarian carcinomas. Nat Genet (2008) 40:650–5. doi:10.1038/ng.117
128. Kataoka F, Tsuda H, Arao T, Nishimura S, Tanaka H, Nomura H, et al. EGRI and FOSB gene expressions in cancer stroma are independent prognostic indicators for epithelial ovarian cancer receiving standard therapy. Genes Chromosomes Cancer (2012) 51:300–12. doi:10.1002/gcc.21916
129. Mitra AK, Zillhardt M, Hua Y, Tiwari P, Murmann AE, Peter ME, et al. MicroRNAs reprogram normal fibroblasts into cancer-associated fibroblasts in ovarian cancer. Cancer Discov (2012) 2:1100–8. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0206
130. Valadi H, Ekström K, Bossios A, Sjöstrand M, Lee JJ, Lötvall JO. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol (2007) 9:654–9. doi:10.1038/ncb1596
131. Cho JA, Park H, Lim EH, Kim KH, Choi JS, Lee JH, et al. Exosomes from ovarian cancer cells induce adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells to acquire the physical and functional characteristics of tumor-supporting myofibroblasts. Gynecol Oncol (2011) 123:379–86. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.08.005
132. Lili LN, Matyunina LV, Walkerm LD, Benigno BB, McDonald JF. Molecular profiling predicts the existence of two functionally distinct classes of ovarian cancer stroma. Biomed Res Int (2013) 2013:846387. doi:10.1155/2013/846387
133. Banerjee S, Kaye SB. New strategies in the treatment of ovarian cancer: current clinical perspectives and future potential. Clin Cancer Res (2013) 19:961–8. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2243
134. Morotti M, Becker CM, Menada MV, Ferrero S. Targeting tyrosine-kinases in ovarian cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs (2013) 22:1265–79. doi:10.1517/13543784.2013.816282
Keywords: ovarian carcinoma, stromal myofibroblasts, metastasis, tumor progression, prognosis
Citation: Davidson B, Trope CG and Reich R (2014) The role of the tumor stroma in ovarian cancer. Front. Oncol. 4:104. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00104
Received: 03 February 2014; Paper pending published: 28 March 2014;
Accepted: 27 April 2014; Published online: 13 May 2014.
Edited by:
Nicolas Wentzensen, National Cancer Institute, USAReviewed by:
Ie-Ming Shih, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, USAElise Kohn, National Cancer Institute, USA
Copyright: © 2014 Davidson, Trope and Reich. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ben Davidson, Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, Oslo N-0424, Norway e-mail: bend@medisin.uio.no