- 1Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- 2Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Despite the advances in biomedical research and clinical applications, cancer remains a leading cause of death worldwide. Given the limitations of conventional chemotherapeutics, including serious toxicities and reduced quality of life for patients, the development of safe and efficacious alternatives with known mechanism of action is much needed. Prevention of cancer through dietary intervention may hold promise and has been investigated extensively in the recent years. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is an energy sensor that plays a key role in the regulation of protein and lipid metabolism in response to changes in fuel availability. When activated, AMPK promotes energy-producing catabolic pathways while inhibiting anabolic pathways, such as cell growth and proliferation – thereby antagonizing carcinogenesis. Other anti-cancer effects of AMPK may include promoting autophagy and DNA repair upon UVB damage. In the last decade, interest in AMPK has grown extensively as it emerged as an attractive target molecule for cancer prevention and treatment. Among the latest developments is the activation of AMPK by naturally occurring dietary constituents and plant products – termed phytochemicals. Owing to their efficacy and safety, phytochemicals are considered as an alternative to the conventional harmful chemotherapy. The rising popularity of using phytochemicals for cancer prevention and therapy is supported by a substantial progress in identifying the molecular pathways involved, including AMPK. In this article, we review the recent progress in this budding field that suggests AMPK as a new molecular target in the prevention and treatment of cancer by phytochemicals.
Introduction
Despite the advances in biomedical research and clinical applications, cancer remains a leading cause of death worldwide. Given the limitations of conventional chemotherapeutics, including serious toxicities and reduced quality of life for patients, the development of safe and efficacious alternatives with known mechanism of action is much needed. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the potential cancer chemopreventive properties of diet-derived agents, and many studies suggest that prevention of cancer through dietary intervention may hold promise. It is estimated that an average of 35% of human cancers (certain types up to 70%) can be attributed to diet (1), and epidemiological research has shown a link in the geographical distribution of cancer incidence to specific diet consumption. According to the World Health Organization report 2002, there are at least 2.7 million deaths globally per year, which are primarily attributable to low fruit and vegetable intake (2). This is not surprising, as the National Cancer Institute identified about 35 plant-based foods that possess anti-cancer benefits, including garlic, soybeans, ginger, onion, turmeric, tomatoes, and cruciferous vegetables (broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, and Brussels sprouts). Furthermore, the chemopreventive efficacy of these diet constituents has been demonstrated in vitro and in vivo. The substantial anticarcinogenic and antimutagenic properties of these tested dietary agents can be attributed to the non-nutritive components of these foods, termed phytochemicals. There could be more than 100 different phytochemicals in just a single serving of vegetables (2), and they can be extracted for therapeutic purposes. Since phytochemicals have not been shown to have any known toxicities, they can be considered as an alternative to the conventional chemotherapy that may be harmful. A number of phytochemicals have been found to have notable efficacy in preclinical models of carcinogenesis, such as those of colorectum, breast, lung, and hematological origin. These include epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) from tea, the flavonoids quercetin and genistein from onions and soya, respectively, curcumin in curry spice and resveratrol from red grapes (3). Chemopreventive phytochemicals can block the initiation or reverse the promotion of carcinogenesis and impede the progression of precancerous cells into malignant ones. A substantial progress has been made in identifying the signal transduction pathways involved in the antineoplastic effects of these substances, such as MAPK, MEK, PI3K, AP-1, COX-2, JNK, ERK, AP-1, and p53 (3–8). Elucidating the molecular mechanisms of phytochemicals fortifies the possibility in developing safe and effective preventative and therapeutic agents for cancer. In this review, we highlight (1) the role of the energy sensing enzyme AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) (9–11) in the prevention and treatment of cancer and (2) the recent developments in this budding field that suggest AMPK as a new molecular target in the prevention and treatment of cancer by phytochemicals.
Function and Regulation of AMPK
AMP-activated protein kinase is a well-conserved energy sensor that plays a key role in the regulation of protein and lipid metabolism in response to changes in fuel availability (9–11). AMPK exists as heterotrimeric complexes comprising a catalytic α-subunit and regulatory β- and γ-subunits. In mammals, each subunit occurs as multiple isoforms encoded by multiple genes that can be assembled to form up to 12 heterotrimeric combinations (12). Although AMPK is traditionally thought to play a major role in the regulation of cellular metabolism, it is now widely recognized to have antineoplastic efficacy and as a target for chemotherapy. A key characteristic of tumor cells is their ability to rapidly grow and divide, thus requiring a tremendous demand for energy. An extensive body of evidence has demonstrated that AMPK inhibits essentially all anabolic pathways that promote cell growth, such as synthesis of fatty acid, phospholipid, protein, and ribosomal RNA synthesis (12, 13). Thus, it is not surprising that AMPK antagonizes cancer cell growth. The first hint that AMPK may be linked to cancer was provided by the finding that liver kinase B1 (LKB1), a known tumor suppressor, acted as an upstream kinase of AMPK (14, 15). LKB1 is mutated in the inherited cancer disorder Peutz–Jeghers syndrome and in many lung and cervical cancers, suggesting that AMPK could play a role in tumor suppression (16, 17).
Activators of AMPK
AMP-activated protein kinase can be activated by various types of metabolic stress that lead to ATP depletion, such as conditions of low nutrient supply or prolonged exercise, or via an increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration (9). The upstream kinases, LKB1 and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase-β (CaMKKβ) activate AMPK by phosphorylating Thr172 in the activation loop of the catalytic α-subunit (18–20). The finding that CaMKKβ can also activate AMPK, independently of LKB1, broadened the potential for AMPK to be used for therapy in cancers that have mutant LKB1 and thus low AMPK activation. Loss of function of the tumor suppressor LKB1 occurs in 30–50% of lung adenocarcinomas. Memmott et al. (21) found that lipid-based AKT inhibitors, phosphatidylinositol ether lipid analogs (PIA), activate AMPK independently of LKB1 in LKB1-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. The more well-known activators of AMPK include several pharmacological agents that stimulate the LKB1 pathway. Metformin, the most widely prescribed Type-2 diabetes drug for more than 30 years, has been shown to activate AMPK in an LKB1-dependent manner (22, 23). Metformin mimics an energetic stress because it inhibits the mitochondrial complex I in hepatocytes and cancer cells which leads to the decrease in intracellular ATP and an increase in glycolysis and lactate production (24, 25). Consistent with this, diabetic patients treated with metformin had a lower incidence of cancer compared to those on other medications (26). In light of this, other retrospective studies have been performed, one of which showed that breast cancer patients on metformin for diabetes responded significantly better to chemotherapy than other diabetic patients not on metformin and non-diabetic patients (27). Since then, several studies have shown that metformin exerts antineoplastic effects in other cancer cells and animal models. Phenformin, a biguanide more potent than metformin, and A-769662, a direct AMPK activator developed by Abbott also delayed tumorigenesis in a mouse cancer model (28). 5-Amino-1-β-Dffff-ribofuranosyl-imidazole-4-carboxamide, or AICAR, is an analog of AMP and widely used to activate AMPK in experiments. Interestingly, AMPK is also activated by ionizing radiation (IR) in lung, prostate, and breast cancer cells, independent of LKB1. This suggests that AMPK may play a role as a target for radiosensitization of human cancer cells (29). Since the discovery of antineoplastic effects of AMPK, the number of patents describing potential AMPK activators has grown rapidly (30, 31). Among the most recent developments is the activation of AMPK by naturally occurring dietary constituents and plant products, to be reviewed in the latter part of this article.
Downstream Targets of AMPK
One of the major growth regulatory pathways controlled by LKB1–AMPK is the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway (Figure 1). The mTOR pathway controls various biological processes that are important for normal functioning of the cell via cell-cycle progression, survival, migration, transcription, translation, and metabolism. AMPK is linked with the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)/protein kinase B (AKT) pathway and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) cascades – all known for being frequently dysregulated in cancer. mTOR can be activated downstream of the PI3K-AKT and Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK signaling pathways (32), which converge on TSC1-TSC2 (33). Moreover, AMPK has been shown to be necessary for cell-cycle arrest at the G1 phase during limited nutrient supply, via phosphorylation of the tumor suppressors p53 (34, 35) and p27 (36). The mTOR complex also controls AMPK-mediated autophagy (37), a cellular process in which the cell breaks down its own organelles and cytosolic components to ensure sufficient metabolites during starvation states. Under certain circumstances, autophagic cells may engage a specific mode of cell death called type II cell death or autophagic cell death (ACD). A number of studies have revealed the role of AMPK in ACD of cancer cells (38, 39). The most upstream components of the autophagy pathway include Atg1 (ULK1 in mammals) and its regulatory subunits Atg13 and Atg17 (40). The mTOR/Raptor pathway is thought to suppress ULK1 and ULK2 and their regulatory subunits (41), while AMPK phosphorylates ULK1, leading to autophagy-mediated cancer cell death. Furthermore, AMPK has been shown to downregulate the expression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, which contributes to the pathophysiological progression of certain human cancers and inflammatory disorders (42). AMPK is required for the expression of xeroderma pigmentosum C (XPC) to promote DNA repair following UV damage (43).
Figure 1. Function and regulation of AMPK leading to tumor suppression. AMPK is activated when AMP/ATP or ADP/ATP ratios in the cells rise due to various physiological stresses, such as hypoglycemia and hypoxemia, leading to the activation of LKB1. Metformin and phenformin can also mimic these stressors and lead to AMPK activation in a LKB1-dependent manner. CaMKKβ activates AMPK in response to calcium increase. Catabolic pathways, such as fatty acid oxidation, are activated by AMPK. For example, AMPK phosphorylation leads to the inactivation of acetyl CoA carboxylase (ACC2). On the other hand, AMPK inhibits anabolic pathways, such as fatty acid synthesis, mediated by ACC1. One of the most well-known pathways of AMPK is through the TSC1/TSC2 complex, leading to the downregulation of mTOR, which can also can be activated downstream of the PI3K-AKT and Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK signaling pathways. The mTOR pathway suppresses apoptosis via its effect on the tumor suppressors p53 and p27 and inhibits autophagy by suppressing UNC-51-like kinase 1 (ULK1) and ULK2. AMPK downregulates these effects of mTOR, thus leading to increased apoptosis and autophagy-mediated cell death. Independent of mTOR, AMPK phosphorylates and activates ULK1 and ULK2, thus triggering autophagy. Furthermore, AMPK has been shown to downregulate the expression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, which contributes to the pathophysiological progression of certain human cancers and inflammatory disorders. AMPK is necessary for the expression of xeroderma pigmentosum C (XPC) to promote DNA repair following UV damage.
Role of AMPK in Cancer Cell Lines and Animal Models of Cancer
Since the AMPK cascade has emerged as an important pathway implicated in cancer control, many discoveries have been made in the past decade revealing robust anti-cancer effects of AMPK in vitro and in vivo, including animal cancer models of breast, lung, colorectum, skin, and hematological malignancies. We review the role of AMPK in major cancers, as outlined below.
Breast Cancer
Observations that diabetics treated with biguanide drugs have a reduced risk of developing cancer have prompted an enthusiasm for these agents as anti-cancer therapies. Metformin, which activates AMPK, was shown to inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in the triple-negative breast cancer cell line, as well as the estrogen receptor (ER) α-positive and the human epidermal receptor (HER) 2-positive cell lines. Moreover, synergistic inhibition of the G1 phase of the cell cycle was demonstrated by the combination treatment of metformin and chemotherapeutic agents carboplatin, paclitaxel, and doxorubicin (44). Moreover, a novel small molecule AMPK activator, OSU-53 derived from inactive peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), was reported to inhibit the proliferation of the triple-negative breast cancer, a disease for which there are limited therapeutic options (45). Phenformin, a stronger biguanide than metformin and also a direct activator of AMPK, was demonstrated to be effective in the prevention and treatment of ER-positive and receptor triple-negative xenografts in immunocompromised mice (46). In another study, AICAR and phenformin elicited clear anti-proliferative effects in ER-positive, ER-negative, and triple-negative breast cancer cell lines (47).
Lung Cancer
AMP-activated protein kinase is considered a potential prognostic and therapeutic target for lung cancer. In tumors from patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the expression of proteins in the AMPK pathway, including pLKB1, AMPK, p-Acetyl-CoA, pTSC2, was inversely correlated with NSCLC recurrence (48). Consistent with this, another study showed a significant association between high phosphorylated AMPK (pAMPK) expression levels with increased overall survival and recurrence-free survival in patients with NSCLC, especially those with adenocarcinoma (49). Never smokers also showed significantly higher levels of pAMPK compared to former and current smokers. In NSCLC cells in vitro, LKB1/AMPK signaling was shown to negatively regulate mTOR activity and contribute to cell growth inhibition in response to 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG), which mimics energy stress (50). Moreover, metformin treatment led to increased apoptosis in human lung cancer cell lines (A549 and NCI-H1299) and significantly inhibited cell proliferation in a dose- and time-dependent manner, which was confirmed by results from A549 tumor xenografts in nude mice (51). Similarly, A/J mice treated with oral metformin after exposure to the tobacco carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) showed a 72% reduction in tumor burden compared to the control mice, which correlated with decreased cellular proliferation and marked inhibition of mTOR in the tumors (52).
Hematological Cancers
AMP-activated protein kinase has been shown to inhibit cancer cell growth in various hematological cancers. In acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell lines, AICAR induced dose- and time-dependent cell growth inhibition (53), leading to increased AKT phosphorylation and decreased mTOR phosphorylation (54). When used in combination with methotrexate or pemetrexed, AMPK showed a synergistic cytotoxic effect and cell growth inhibition (53). Sengupta et al. (55) reported that the apoptotic effect of AMPK was mediated by activation of the p38 MAPK pathway, increased expression of cell-cycle inhibitory proteins p27 and p53, and the downstream effects of the mTOR pathway. In B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) cells, AMPK-induced apoptosis in a p53-independent manner (56). In mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), a clinically aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by the t(11;14)(q13;q32) and overexpression of cyclin D1, stimulation of the AMPK kinase activity using AICAR inhibited phosphorylation of critical downstream effectors of mTOR signaling, such as 4E-BP1 and ribosomal protein s6 (rps6) (57). In BCR-ABL-expressing chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) precursors and ALL cells that are positive for the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+), metformin, and AICAR suppressed the mTOR pathway and cell growth (58). Lastly, induction of the LKB1/AMPK tumor suppressor pathway demonstrates a strong potential for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Green et al. showed that the LKB1/AMPK/TSC tumor suppressor axis could lead to a specific inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) catalytic activity, inducing 4E-BP1 dephosphorylation, which inhibits the initiation step of mRNA translation. Metformin consequently reduced the recruitment of mRNA molecules encoding oncogenic proteins to the polysomes, resulting in a strong anti-leukemic activity against primary AML cells while sparing normal hematopoiesis ex vivo and significantly reducing the growth of AML cells in nude mice (59).
Skin Cancer
The role of AMPK in UVB-induced skin cancer is still only beginning to be understood and depends on the type of skin cancer. AMPK activators phenformin and AICAR were shown to inhibit the cell growth of both BRAF-mutant or NRAS-mutant melanoma cell, due to cell-cycle arrest in either the G0/G1 or the S phase, associated with an increased expression of the p21 cell-cycle inhibitor (60). However, another study revealed that BRAF-mutant melanoma cells are resistant to metformin in vitro, while metformin accelerates their growth in vivo. Surprisingly, metformin inhibited tumor growth when vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling was inhibited. Thus, VEGF inhibitors and metformin synergized to suppress the growth of BRAF-mutant tumors (61). The role of AMPK in basal cell carcinoma remains unclear. In a study by Byekova et al. (62) LKB1 and pAMPK expression was shown to be upregulated in UVB-induced murine BCC and in human skin tumor keratinocytes. Paradoxically, persistent mTOR activation was also observed. Metformin was effective in activating the LKB1/AMPK pathway only in HaCaT keratinocytes but not in human carcinoma A431 cells, suggesting a complex regulatory mechanism for the persistent mTOR activation in murine BCCs. In contrast, Zhang and Bowden reported that UVB irradiation, a strong carcinogen for non-melanoma skin cancer, reduced activation of AMPK and LKB1, leading to increased Cox-2 mRNA stability, which may contribute to cancer development (63). Furthermore, our recent studies showed that the AMPK pathway is down-regulated in human and mouse squamous cell carcinomas and that its activators AICAR and metformin increased the expression of the DNA repair protein xeroderma pigmentosum C (XPC) and UVB-induced DNA repair in mouse skin and in normal human epidermal keratinocytes (43). Furthermore, in UVB-damaged tumor-bearing mice, both topical and systemic metformin prevented the formation of new tumors and suppressed growth of established tumors, demonstrating that AMPK acts as a tumor suppressor in the skin by promoting DNA repair and controlling cell proliferation (43).
Activation of AMPK by Phytochemicals
It was not until about 5 years ago that AMPK began to be recognized as a target for various phytochemicals. In this section, we review the studies that have demonstrated the role of AMPK in the chemopreventive effects of phytochemicals (Table 1), the majority of which have been reported in the last few years.
Table 1. Chemopreventive/chemotherapeutic phytochemicals that activate AMPK.
Curcumin
Curcumin (diferuloylmethane), a yellow pigment present in the rhizome of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.), is one of most extensively investigated phytochemicals in the field of chemoprevention and is used in early clinical trials as a novel anti-cancer agent. Curcumin has been shown to suppress tumor progression in various animal models of cancer (64–67). Recently, AMPK was found to be a new molecular target of curcumin (Figure 2). Pan et al. (67) showed that activation of AMPK by curcumin has shown to be responsible for the cytotoxic effects of curcumin ovarian cancer cells. In another study, stimulation of AMPK by curcumin resulted in the downregulation of PPAR (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor)-g in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and a decrease in COX-2 in MCF-7 cells (65). Application of a synthetic AMPK activator also supported the evidence that AMPK acts as an upstream signal of PPARγ in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. In cancer cells, AMPK was found to act as a regulator of ERK1/2, p38, and COX-2. Thus, activation of AMPK by curcumin and its downstream targets such as PPAR-g, MAP kinases, and COX-2 is important in regulating adipocytes and cancer cells (66). Consistent with this study, curcumin activated AMPK to induce apoptosis and limit proliferation of colon cancer cells via the inhibition of AKT and COX-2 (66). Thus, curcumin is a potent stimulator of AMPK leading to chemoprevention.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of AMPK-dependent anti-cancer effects of curcumin. Curcumin activates AMPK and increases cell death of ovarian cancer cells, in a p38 MAPK-dependent manner. Activation of AMPK by curcumin also leads to downregulation of PPAR g and COX-2, leading to decreased differentiation of adipocytes and delayed growth of breast cancer cells, respectively. Downregulation of COX-2 also leads to apoptosis of colon cancer cells. In addition, curcumin downregulates mTOR, independent of AMPK.
Resveratrol
Resveratrol (3,4′,5-trihydroxy-trans-stilbene) is a type of natural phenol that is present in grapes and a key antioxidant ingredient in red wine. The consumption of red wine has been correlated with the reduction of mortality rates from cardiovascular diseases and certain cancers. Moreover, anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, blood sugar-lowering, and other beneficial cardiovascular effects of resveratrol have been reported in animal models and human clinical trials (68–71). One of the earliest findings of its anti-cancer effects was in 1997, in which topical resveratrol applications prevented skin cancer development in mice treated with a carcinogen (72). There have since been many studies demonstrating the anti-cancer activity of resveratrol in animal models (73). AMPK is now a recognized target of resveratrol that mediates its anti-cancer effects (Figure 3). In 2007, Hwang et al. (74) showed that resveratrol activates AMPK and induces apoptosis of chemoresistant HT-29 colon cancer cells and identified that reactive oxygen species (ROS) acted as an upstream regulator of AMPK. Resveratrol was also found to activate AMPK, leading to the suppression of NF-κB-dependent COX-2, a pathway implicated in cancer development (75). Moreover, resveratrol-induced autophagy-mediated cell death in imatinib-sensitive and – resistant CML cells. AMPK knockdown or mTOR overexpression impaired resveratrol-induced autophagy, suggesting that AMPK activation and mTOR inhibition is important for autophagy-mediated cancer cell death (76). Resveratrol also increased sensitivity to standard chemotherapies, thus reducing the required dosage of potentially toxic substances in prostate cancer, glioblastoma, and breast cancer cells (77–79). A series of screening resveratrol methylated derivatives was performed, and trans-3,4-dimethoxystilbene (3,4-DMS) was found to effectively inhibit endothelial cell proliferation, migration, tube formation, and endogenous neovascularization. Moreover, 3,4-DMS induced autophagy in endothelial cells through AMPK activation and downstream inhibition of the mTOR signaling pathway (80). As outlined in this section, evidence for the chemopreventive potential of resveratrol is growing, as the various molecular mechanisms of its action via AMPK is being elucidated.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of AMPK-dependent anti-cancer effects of resveratrol. Activation of AMPK by resveratrol leads to apoptosis of colon cancer cells, enhancement of cancer cell response to ionizing radiation, and mTOR-dependent and – independent autophagy, leading to cell death in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cells. Resveratrol also activates SIRT1, which leads to AMPK activation, leading to downregulation of mTOR and inhibition of 4E-BP1 and decreased proliferation of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and ER-negative breast cancer cells. Furthermore, activation of AMPK and subsequent downregulation of mTOR increases sensitivity of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cells to temozolomide.
Flavonoids and Related Compounds
Flavonoids can be found in many different sources, including soy, berries, tea, wine, beer, chocolate, many vegetables, and most fruits. While there are several 1000 types, they can be categorized as flavones (quercetin, fisetin, luteolin), isoflavonoids (genistein, deguelin), and neoflavonoids (81). Epidemiological evidence reveals a lower incidence of prostate cancer in Asian countries, where soy products are more frequently consumed than in Western countries. The chemopreventive effects of a soy isoflavonoid genistein can be attributed to its ability to activate AMPK (Figure 4) and PTEN, leading to the induction of the antioxidant enzymes manganese superoxide dismutase and catalase (82). In another study, genistein was demonstrated to potentiate arsenic trioxide-induced apoptosis in human leukemia cells by activation of AMPK (83). Moreover, anthocyanin – belonging to the family of flavones that occurs in all tissues of higher plants, including leaves, stems, roots, flowers, and fruits – is shown to be a powerful activator of AMPK. Lee and Park (84) demonstrated that anthocyanin activates AMPK, leading to a reduction in mTOR phosphorylation and ultimately inhibiting cancer cell growth. Fisetin, a flavonoid, activates AMPK to induce apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells (85), inhibits PI3K/AKT and mTOR and activates AMPK in non-small cell lung cancer (86), and induces autophagy-mediated cell death by activating AMPK and suppressing mTOR in prostate cancer cells (87). Quercetin induces apoptosis via AMPK activation and p53 in HT-29 colon cancer cells (88) and suppresses cell viability via AMPK-induced Hsp70 and EGFR downregulation (89). Apigenin induces AMPK, inhibiting mTOR and further inducing autophagy in both HaCaT cell line and primary normal human epidermal keratinocytes. This effect was independent of AKT and LKB1 but dependent on CaMMKβ (90). Luteolin showed its anti-tumor effects in an in vivo tumor model, in which its activation of AMPK reduced tumor volume in a tumor xenograft model (91). Deguelin, a plant-derived rotenoid with cancer chemopreventive activity, was shown to inhibit UVB-induced skin carcinogenesis with the SKh-1 hairless mouse model. Topically applied deguelin significantly inhibited the multiplicity of UVB-induced skin tumors by activating AMPK (92). Celastrol, another antioxidant flavonoid, suppressed the viability of breast cancer MCF-7 cells in an AMPK-dependent fashion. Celastrol also induced an increase in ROS levels, leading to AMPK phosphorylation and increased the pro-apoptotic p53 in an AMPK-dependent manner (93). Chrysin, a naturally occurring flavone chemically extracted from the passion flowers Passiflora caerulea and Passiflora incarnata, leads to growth inhibition and apoptosis of lung cancer cells via AMPK activation and inhibition of AKT/mTOR (94). Thus, flavonoids and related compounds act as direct activators of AMPK and demonstrate their promising potential to be used as chemotherapeutic agents.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of AMPK-dependent anti-cancer effects of flavonoids and related compounds. This figure shows the major flavonoids and their AMPK-dependent effects on inhibition of cancer growth. Apigenin and anthocyanin activates AMPK, which inhibits mTOR signaling, leading to apoptosis of GBM, multiple myeloma (MM), and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Activation of AMPK by fisetin and hispidulin also inhibits mTOR, resulting in autophagy-dependent cancer cell death and decreased growth of colon cancer cells, respectively. Quercetin inhibits survival of colon cancer cells by downregulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling and heat shock protein (hsp)70 expression. Activation of AMPK deguelin leads to UVB-induced tumorigenesis in a non-melanoma skin cancer mouse model. See text for effects of other flavonoids and related compounds.
Epigallocatechin Gallate
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate, EGCG, a green tea-derived polyphenol, has been shown to suppress cancer cell proliferation and interfere with the several signaling pathways and induce apoptosis. EGCG treatment of HT-29 colon cancer cells resulted in a strong activation of AMPK and an inhibition of COX-2 expression (Figure 5). Treatment with an AMPK inhibitor completely abolished the inhibition of COX-2 by EGCG. Also, AMPK activation was accompanied by a reduction of VEGF and glucose transporter, Glut-1 in EGCG-treated cancer cells. These findings support the regulatory role of AMPK in COX-2 expression in EGCG-treated cancer cells (95). Moreover, analogs of EGCG have been synthesized and found to be more potent AMPK activators than metformin and EGCG. Activation of AMPK by these EGCG analogs resulted in the inhibition of cell proliferation, up-regulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21, downregulation of the mTOR pathway, and suppression of stem cell population in human breast cancer cells. This study suggests that specific and more potent AMPK activators can be derived from natural and synthetic sources and be used for chemotherapy (96). In a model of diethylnitrosamine-induced liver tumorigenesis in obese and diabetic mice, EGCG improved liver steatosis and activated AMPK in the liver, suggesting that EGCG may prevent obesity-related liver tumorigenesis (97). EGCG, therefore, may be useful in the chemoprevention of liver tumorigenesis in obese individuals by the activation of AMPK, consistent with the reported effects of metformin. EGCG is known to play a critical role in growth inhibition and apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. Furthermore, EGCG was shown to enhance the anti-tumor activity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), one of the most commonly used chemotherapeutic drugs, suggesting that EGCG may be used as an adjunct therapy for the treatment of advanced-stage liver cancer (98).
Figure 5. Schematic representation of AMPK-dependent anti-cancer effects of EGCG. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate, EGCG, stimulates AMPK, leading to suppression of breast cancer cell growth by inhibition of mTOR and activation of p21. Inhibition of COX-2 by EGCG-induced AMPK activation leads to apoptosis in colon cancer cells.
Phytochemicals Belonging to Other Category
Berberine, a traditional plant alkaloid used in Ayurvedic and Chinese medicine for its antimicrobial and antiprotozoal properties, strongly increased AMPK phosphorylation via ROS production, leading to inhibition of tumor cell adhesion, tumor invasion, and the expression of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related genes. Furthermore, berberine inhibited the metastatic potential of melanoma cells through a decrease in ERK activity and protein levels of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) by a berberine-induced AMPK activation (99). In another study, berberine was shown to inhibit migration of colon cancer cells in an AMPK-dependent manner (100). Furthermore, 24-hydroxyursolic acid from persimmon, capsaicin, and p-HPEA-EDA, a phenolic compound of virgin olive oil, activate AMPK and inhibit cell survival in HT-29 colon cancer cells (100–103).
Conclusion and Future Considerations
In summary, the use of phytochemicals derived from dietary agents holds promise in the prevention and treatment of cancer, and AMPK is one of the major pathways activated by many phytochemicals. Not only do phytochemicals activate AMPK to increase cancer cell apoptosis and inhibit cell proliferation, but they have also been shown to be effective in reducing the toxicity associated with standard chemotherapy by increasing the sensitivity of cancer cells to drugs. While the majority of the studies on AMPK that we reported in this review demonstrate that it is an antineoplastic agent, some evidence suggests the role of AMPK in promoting cancer. This warrants further investigation. As AMPK exists as different heterotrimeric compound consisting of various isoforms, it is conceivable that different contexts of stimulation may lead to disparate consequences. There are other phytochemicals that have been reported to activate AMPK, such as Honokiol (104), that have been shown to have consequences other than cancer prevention. Thus, it seems that AMPK can be used not only as a chemotherapeutic agent but also to protect from injury, diabetes, or inflammatory diseases.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Doll R, Peto R. The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. J Natl Cancer Inst (1981) 66:1191–308.
2. Surh YJ. Cancer chemoprevention with dietary phytochemicals. Nat Rev Cancer (2003) 3:768–80. doi:10.1038/nrc1189
3. Manson MM. Cancer prevention – the potential for diet to modulate molecular signalling. Trends Mol Med (2003) 9:11–8. doi:10.1016/S1471-4914(02)00002-3
4. Agarwal R. Cell signaling and regulators of cell cycle as molecular targets for prostate cancer prevention by dietary agents. Biochem Pharmacol (2000) 60:1051–9. doi:10.1016/S0006-2952(00)00385-3
6. Gescher A, Pastorino U, Plummer SM, Manson MM. Suppression of tumour development by substances derived from the diet-mechanisms and clinical implications. Br J Clin Pharmacol (1998) 45:1–12. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00640.x
7. Kong AN, Yu R, Hebbar V, Chen C, Owuor E, Hu R, et al. Signal transduction events elicited by cancer prevention compounds. Mutat Res (2001) 48(0-481):231–41.
8. Manson MM, Gescher A, Hudson EA, Plummer SM, Squires MS, Prigent SA. Blocking and suppressing mechanisms of chemoprevention by dietary constituents. Toxicol Lett (2000) 11(2-113):499–505. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00211-8
9. Hardie DG. Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase: a central regulator of metabolism with roles in diabetes, cancer, and viral infection. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol (2011) 76:155–64. doi:10.1101/sqb.2011.76.010819
10. Hardie DG, Ross FA, Hawley SA. AMPK: a nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2012) 13:251–62. doi:10.1038/nrm3311
11. Steinberg GR, Kemp BE. AMPK in health and disease. Physiol Rev (2009) 89:1025–78. doi:10.1152/physrev.00011.2008
12. Hardie DG. AMP-activated/SNF1 protein kinases: conserved guardians of cellular energy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2007) 8:774–85. doi:10.1038/nrm2249
13. Hoppe S, Bierhoff H, Cado I, Weber A, Tiebe M, Grummt I, et al. AMP-activated protein kinase adapts rRNA synthesis to cellular energy supply. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2009) 106:17781–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.0909873106
14. Hawley SA, Boudeau J, Reid JL, Mustard KJ, Udd L, Makela TP, et al. Complexes between the LKB1 tumor suppressor, STRAD alpha/beta and MO25 alpha/beta are upstream kinases in the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. J Biol (2003) 2:28. doi:10.1186/1475-4924-2-28
15. Woods A, Johnstone SR, Dickerson K, Leiper FC, Fryer LG, Neumann D, et al. LKB1 is the upstream kinase in the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. Curr Biol (2003) 13:2004–8. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.031
16. Hemminki A, Markie D, Tomlinson I, Avizienyte E, Roth S, Loukola A, et al. A serine/threonine kinase gene defective in Peutz–Jeghers syndrome. Nature (1998) 391:184–7. doi:10.1038/34432
17. Sanchez-Cespedes M, Parrella P, Esteller M, Nomoto S, Trink B, Engles JM, et al. Inactivation of LKB1/STK11 is a common event in adenocarcinomas of the lung. Cancer Res (2002) 62:3659–62.
18. Hawley SA, Pan DA, Mustard KJ, Ross L, Bain J, Edelman AM, et al. Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase-beta is an alternative upstream kinase for AMP-activated protein kinase. Cell Metab (2005) 2:9–19. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2005.05.009
19. Hurley RL, Anderson KA, Franzone JM, Kemp BE, Means AR, Witters LA. The Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinases are AMP-activated protein kinase kinases. J Biol Chem (2005) 280:29060–6. doi:10.1074/jbc.M503824200
20. Woods A, Dickerson K, Heath R, Hong SP, Momcilovic M, Johnstone SR, et al. Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase-beta acts upstream of AMP-activated protein kinase in mammalian cells. Cell Metab (2005) 2:21–33. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2005.06.005
21. Memmott RM, Gills JJ, Hollingshead M, Powers MC, Chen Z, Kemp B, et al. Phosphatidylinositol ether lipid analogues induce AMP-activated protein kinase-dependent death in LKB1-mutant non small cell lung cancer cells. Cancer Res (2008) 68:580–8. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-3091
22. Dykens JA, Jamieson J, Marroquin L, Nadanaciva S, Billis PA, Will Y. Biguanide-induced mitochondrial dysfunction yields increased lactate production and cytotoxicity of aerobically-poised HepG2 cells and human hepatocytes in vitro. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol (2008) 233:203–10. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2008.08.013
23. Shaw RJ, Lamia KA, Vasquez D, Koo SH, Bardeesy N, Depinho RA, et al. The kinase LKB1 mediates glucose homeostasis in liver and therapeutic effects of metformin. Science (2005) 310:1642–6. doi:10.1126/science.1120781
24. Ben Sahra I, Laurent K, Giuliano S, Larbret F, Ponzio G, Gounon P, et al. Targeting cancer cell metabolism: the combination of metformin and 2-deoxyglucose induces p53-dependent apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res (2010) 70:2465–75. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2782
25. El-Mir MY, Nogueira V, Fontaine E, Averet N, Rigoulet M, Leverve X. Dimethylbiguanide inhibits cell respiration via an indirect effect targeted on the respiratory chain complex I. J Biol Chem (2000) 275:223–8. doi:10.1074/jbc.275.1.223
26. Evans JM, Donnelly LA, Emslie-Smith AM, Alessi DR, Morris AD. Metformin and reduced risk of cancer in diabetic patients. BMJ (2005) 330:1304–5. doi:10.1136/bmj.38415.708634.F7
27. Jiralerspong S, Palla SL, Giordano SH, Meric-Bernstam F, Liedtke C, Barnett CM, et al. Metformin and pathologic complete responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in diabetic patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (2009) 27:3297–302. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.19.6410
28. Huang X, Wullschleger S, Shpiro N, McGuire VA, Sakamoto K, Woods YL, et al. Important role of the LKB1-AMPK pathway in suppressing tumorigenesis in PTEN-deficient mice. Biochem J (2008) 412:211–21. doi:10.1042/BJ20080557
29. Sanli T, Rashid A, Liu C, Harding S, Bristow RG, Cutz JC, et al. Ionizing radiation activates AMP-activated kinase (AMPK): a target for radiosensitization of human cancer cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2010) 78:221–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.005
30. Giordanetto F, Karis D. Direct AMP-activated protein kinase activators: a review of evidence from the patent literature. Expert Opin Ther Pat (2012) 22:1467–77. doi:10.1517/13543776.2012.743994
31. Yun H, Ha J. AMP-activated protein kinase modulators: a patent review (2006 - 2010). Expert Opin Ther Pat (2011) 21:983–1005. doi:10.1517/13543776.2011.577069
32. Dazert E, Hall MN. mTOR signaling in disease. Curr Opin Cell Biol (2011) 23:744–55. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2011.09.003
33. Manning BD, Cantley LC. Rheb fills a GAP between TSC and TOR. Trends Biochem Sci (2003) 28:573–6. doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2003.09.003
34. Imamura K, Ogura T, Kishimoto A, Kaminishi M, Esumi H. Cell cycle regulation via p53 phosphorylation by a 5’-AMP activated protein kinase activator, 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-D-ribofuranoside, in a human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2001) 287:562–7. doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.5627
35. Jones RG, Plas DR, Kubek S, Buzzai M, Mu J, Xu Y, et al. AMP-activated protein kinase induces a p53-dependent metabolic checkpoint. Mol Cell (2005) 18:283–93. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.027
36. Liang J, Shao SH, Xu ZX, Hennessy B, Ding Z, Larrea M, et al. The energy sensing LKB1-AMPK pathway regulates p27(kip1) phosphorylation mediating the decision to enter autophagy or apoptosis. Nat Cell Biol (2007) 9:218–24. doi:10.1038/ncb1537
37. Mihaylova MM, Shaw RJ. The AMPK signalling pathway coordinates cell growth, autophagy and metabolism. Nat Cell Biol (2011) 13:1016–23. doi:10.1038/ncb2329
38. Puissant A, Auberger P. AMPK- and p62/SQSTM1-dependent autophagy mediate Resveratrol-induced cell death in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Autophagy (2010) 6:655–7. doi:10.4161/auto.6.5.12126
39. Puissant A, Robert G, Auberger P. Targeting autophagy to fight hematopoietic malignancies. Cell Cycle (2010) 9:3470–8. doi:10.4161/cc.9.17.13048
40. Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature (2008) 451:1069–75. doi:10.1038/nature06639
41. Kamada Y, Funakoshi T, Shintani T, Nagano K, Ohsumi M, Ohsumi Y. Tor-mediated induction of autophagy via an Apg1 protein kinase complex. J Cell Biol (2000) 150:1507–13. doi:10.1083/jcb.150.6.1507
42. Lala PK, Chakraborty C. Role of nitric oxide in carcinogenesis and tumour progression. Lancet Oncol (2001) 2:149–56. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(00)00256-4
43. Wu CL, Qiang L, Han W, Ming M, Viollet B, He YY. Role of AMPK in UVB-induced DNA damage repair and growth control. Oncogene (2013) 32:2682–9. doi:10.1038/onc.2012.279
44. Liu H, Scholz C, Zang C, Schefe JH, Habbel P, Regierer AC, et al. Metformin and the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001) sensitize breast cancer cells to the cytotoxic effect of chemotherapeutic drugs in vitro. Anticancer Res (2012) 32:1627–37.
45. Lee KH, Hsu EC, Guh JH, Yang HC, Wang D, Kulp SK, et al. Targeting energy metabolic and oncogenic signaling pathways in triple-negative breast cancer by a novel adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activator. J Biol Chem (2011) 286:39247–58. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.264598
46. Appleyard MV, Murray KE, Coates PJ, Wullschleger S, Bray SE, Kernohan NM, et al. Phenformin as prophylaxis and therapy in breast cancer xenografts. Br J Cancer (2012) 106:1117–22. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.56
47. El-Masry OS, Brown BL, Dobson PR. Effects of activation of AMPK on human breast cancer cell lines with different genetic backgrounds. Oncol Lett (2012) 3:224–8.
48. Nanjundan M, Byers LA, Carey MS, Siwak DR, Raso MG, Diao L, et al. Proteomic profiling identifies pathways dysregulated in non-small cell lung cancer and an inverse association of AMPK and adhesion pathways with recurrence. J Thorac Oncol (2010) 5:1894–904. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181f2a266
49. William WN, Kim JS, Liu DD, Solis L, Behrens C, Lee JJ, et al. The impact of phosphorylated AMP-activated protein kinase expression on lung cancer survival. Ann Oncol (2012) 23:78–85. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr036
50. Dong LX, Sun LL, Zhang X, Pan L, Lian LJ, Chen Z, et al. Negative regulation of mTOR activity by LKB1-AMPK signaling in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Acta Pharmacol Sin (2013) 34:314–8. doi:10.1038/aps.2012.143
51. Wu N, Gu C, Gu H, Hu H, Han Y, Li Q. Metformin induces apoptosis of lung cancer cells through activating JNK/p38 MAPK pathway and GADD153. Neoplasma (2011) 58:482–90. doi:10.4149/neo_2011_06_482
52. Memmott RM, Mercado JR, Maier CR, Kawabata S, Fox SD, Dennis PA. Metformin prevents tobacco carcinogen – induced lung tumorigenesis. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) (2010) 3:1066–76. doi:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0055
53. Kuznetsov JN, Leclerc GJ, Leclerc GM, Barredo JC. AMPK and Akt determine apoptotic cell death following perturbations of one-carbon metabolism by regulating ER stress in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Mol Cancer Ther (2011) 10:437–47. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0777
54. Leclerc GM, Leclerc GJ, Fu G, Barredo JC. AMPK-induced activation of Akt by AICAR is mediated by IGF-1R dependent and independent mechanisms in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Mol Signal (2010) 5:15. doi:10.1186/1750-2187-5-15
55. Sengupta TK, Leclerc GM, Hsieh-Kinser TT, Leclerc GJ, Singh I, Barredo JC. Cytotoxic effect of 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-4-ribofuranoside (AICAR) on childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells: implication for targeted therapy. Mol Cancer (2007) 6:46. doi:10.1186/1476-4598-6-46
56. Campas C, Lopez JM, Santidrian AF, Barragan M, Bellosillo B, Colomer D, et al. Acadesine activates AMPK and induces apoptosis in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells but not in T lymphocytes. Blood (2003) 101:3674–80. doi:10.1182/blood-2002-07-2339
57. Drakos E, Atsaves V, Li J, Leventaki V, Andreeff M, Medeiros LJ, et al. Stabilization and activation of p53 downregulates mTOR signaling through AMPK in mantle cell lymphoma. Leukemia (2009) 23:784–90. doi:10.1038/leu.2008.348
58. Vakana E, Altman JK, Glaser H, Donato NJ, Platanias LC. Antileukemic effects of AMPK activators on BCR-ABL-expressing cells. Blood (2011) 118:6399–402. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-01-332783
59. Green AS, Chapuis N, Maciel TT, Willems L, Lambert M, Arnoult C, et al. The LKB1/AMPK signaling pathway has tumor suppressor activity in acute myeloid leukemia through the repression of mTOR-dependent oncogenic mRNA translation. Blood (2010) 116:4262–73. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-02-269837
60. Petti C, Vegetti C, Molla A, Bersani I, Cleris L, Mustard KJ, et al. AMPK activators inhibit the proliferation of human melanomas bearing the activated MAPK pathway. Melanoma Res (2012) 22:341–50. doi:10.1097/CMR.0b013e3283544929
61. Martin MJ, Hayward R, Viros A, Marais R. Metformin accelerates the growth of BRAF V600E-driven melanoma by upregulating VEGF-A. Cancer Discov (2012) 2:344–55. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0280
62. Byekova YA, Herrmann JL, Xu J, Elmets CA, Athar M. Liver kinase B1 (LKB1) in the pathogenesis of UVB-induced murine basal cell carcinoma. Arch Biochem Biophys (2011) 508:204–11. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2011.01.006
63. Zhang J, Bowden GT. UVB irradiation regulates Cox-2 mRNA stability through AMPK and HuR in human keratinocytes. Mol Carcinog (2008) 47:974–83. doi:10.1002/mc.20450
64. Beevers CS, Chen L, Liu L, Luo Y, Webster NJ, Huang S. Curcumin disrupts the Mammalian target of rapamycin-raptor complex. Cancer Res (2009) 69:1000–8. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2367
65. Lee YK, Lee WS, Hwang JT, Kwon DY, Surh YJ, Park OJ. Curcumin exerts antidifferentiation effect through AMPKalpha-PPAR-gamma in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and antiproliferatory effect through AMPKalpha-COX-2 in cancer cells. J Agric Food Chem (2009) 57:305–10. doi:10.1021/jf802737z
66. Lee YK, Park SY, Kim YM, Park OJ. Regulatory effect of the AMPK-COX-2 signaling pathway in curcumin-induced apoptosis in HT-29 colon cancer cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2009) 1171:489–94. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04699.x
67. Pan W, Yang H, Cao C, Song X, Wallin B, Kivlin R, et al. AMPK mediates curcumin-induced cell death in CaOV3 ovarian cancer cells. Oncol Rep (2008) 20:1553–9.
68. Biasutto L, Mattarei A, Zoratti M. Resveratrol and health: the starting point. Chembiochem (2012) 13:1256–9. doi:10.1002/cbic.201200193
69. Constant J. Alcohol, ischemic heart disease, and the French paradox. Clin Cardiol (1997) 20:420–4. doi:10.1002/clc.4960200504
70. Fremont L. Biological effects of resveratrol. Life Sci (2000) 66:663–73. doi:10.1016/S0024-3205(99)00410-5
71. Tome-Carneiro J, Larrosa M, Gonzalez-Sarrias A, Tomas-Barberan FA, Garcia-Conesa MT, Espin JC. Resveratrol and clinical trials: the crossroad from in vitro studies to human evidence. Curr Pharm Des (2013). [Epub ahead of print].
72. Jang M, Cai L, Udeani GO, Slowing KV, Thomas CF, Beecher CW, et al. Cancer chemopreventive activity of resveratrol, a natural product derived from grapes. Science (1997) 275:218–20. doi:10.1126/science.275.5297.218
73. Baur JA, Sinclair DA. Therapeutic potential of resveratrol: the in vivo evidence. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2006) 5:493–506. doi:10.1038/nrd2060
74. Hwang JT, Kwak DW, Lin SK, Kim HM, Kim YM, Park OJ. Resveratrol induces apoptosis in chemoresistant cancer cells via modulation of AMPK signaling pathway. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2007) 1095:441–8. doi:10.1196/annals.1397.047
75. Yi CO, Jeon BT, Shin HJ, Jeong EA, Chang KC, Lee JE, et al. Resveratrol activates AMPK and suppresses LPS-induced NF-kappaB-dependent COX-2 activation in RAW 264.7 macrophage cells. Anat Cell Biol (2011) 44:194–203. doi:10.5115/acb.2011.44.3.194
76. Puissant A, Robert G, Fenouille N, Luciano F, Cassuto JP, Raynaud S, et al. Resveratrol promotes autophagic cell death in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells via JNK-mediated p62/SQSTM1 expression and AMPK activation. Cancer Res (2010) 70:1042–52. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3537
77. Castillo-Pichardo L, Dharmawardhane SF. Grape polyphenols inhibit Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling and potentiate the effects of gefitinib in breast cancer. Nutr Cancer (2012) 64:1058–69. doi:10.1080/01635581.2012.716898
78. Rashid A, Liu C, Sanli T, Tsiani E, Singh G, Bristow RG, et al. Resveratrol enhances prostate cancer cell response to ionizing radiation. Modulation of the AMPK Akt and mTOR pathways. Radiat Oncol (2011) 6:144. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-6-144
79. Yuan Y, Xue X, Guo RB, Sun XL, Hu G. Resveratrol enhances the antitumor effects of temozolomide in glioblastoma via ROS-dependent AMPK-TSC-mTOR signaling pathway. CNS Neurosci Ther (2012) 18:536–46. doi:10.1111/j.1755-5949.2012.00319.x
80. Zhang L, Jing H, Cui L, Li H, Zhou B, Zhou G, et al. 3,4-Dimethoxystilbene, a resveratrol derivative with anti-angiogenic effect, induces both macroautophagy and apoptosis in endothelial cells. J Cell Biochem (2013) 114:697–707. doi:10.1002/jcb.24411
81. Kandaswami C, Lee LT, Lee PP, Hwang JJ, Ke FC, Huang YT, et al. The antitumor activities of flavonoids. In vivo (2005) 19:895–909.
82. Park CE, Yun H, Lee EB, Min BI, Bae H, Choe W, et al. The antioxidant effects of genistein are associated with AMP-activated protein kinase activation and PTEN induction in prostate cancer cells. J Med Food (2010) 13:815–20. doi:10.1089/jmf.2009.1359
83. Sanchez Y, Amran D, Fernandez C, de Blas E, Aller P. Genistein selectively potentiates arsenic trioxide-induced apoptosis in human leukemia cells via reactive oxygen species generation and activation of reactive oxygen species-inducible protein kinases (p38-MAPK, AMPK). Int J Cancer (2008) 123:1205–14. doi:10.1002/ijc.23639
84. Lee YK, Park OJ. Regulation of mutual inhibitory activities between AMPK and Akt with quercetin in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Oncol Rep (2010) 24:1493–7.
85. Jang KY, Jeong SJ, Kim SH, Jung JH, Kim JH, Koh W, et al. Activation of reactive oxygen species/AMP activated protein kinase signaling mediates fisetin-induced apoptosis in multiple myeloma U266 cells. Cancer Lett (2012) 319:197–202. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2012.01.008
86. Khan N, Afaq F, Khusro FH, Mustafa Adhami V, Suh Y, Mukhtar H. Dual inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and mammalian target of rapamycin signaling in human nonsmall cell lung cancer cells by a dietary flavonoid fisetin. Int J Cancer (2012) 130:1695–705. doi:10.1002/ijc.26178
87. Suh Y, Afaq F, Khan N, Johnson JJ, Khusro FH, Mukhtar H. Fisetin induces autophagic cell death through suppression of mTOR signaling pathway in prostate cancer cells. Carcinogenesis (2010) 31:1424–33. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgq115
88. Kim HJ, Kim SK, Kim BS, Lee SH, Park YS, Park BK, et al. Apoptotic effect of quercetin on HT-29 colon cancer cells via the AMPK signaling pathway. J Agric Food Chem (2010) 58:8643–50. doi:10.1021/jf101510z
89. Jung JH, Lee JO, Kim JH, Lee SK, You GY, Park SH, et al. Quercetin suppresses HeLa cell viability via AMPK-induced HSP70 and EGFR down-regulation. J Cell Physiol (2010) 223:408–14. doi:10.1002/jcp.22049
90. Tong X, Smith KA, Pelling JC. Apigenin, a chemopreventive bioflavonoid, induces AMP-activated protein kinase activation in human keratinocytes. Mol Carcinog (2012) 51:268–79. doi:10.1002/mc.20793
91. Hwang JT, Park OJ, Lee YK, Sung MJ, Hur HJ, Kim MS, et al. Anti-tumor effect of luteolin is accompanied by AMP-activated protein kinase and nuclear factor-kappaB modulation in HepG2 hepatocarcinoma cells. Int J Mol Med (2011) 28:25–31. doi:10.3892/ijmm.2011.667
92. Gills JJ, Kosmeder J 2nd, Moon RC, Lantvit DD, Pezzuto JM. Effect of deguelin on UVB-induced skin carcinogenesis. J Chemother (2005) 17:297–301.
93. Kim JH, Lee JO, Lee SK, Kim N, You GY, Moon JW, et al. Celastrol suppresses breast cancer MCF-7 cell viability via the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-induced p53-polo like kinase 2 (PLK-2) pathway. Cell Signal (2013) 25:805–13. doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.12.005
94. Shao JJ, Zhang AP, Qin W, Zheng L, Zhu YF, Chen X. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation is involved in chrysin-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis in cultured A549 lung cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2012) 423:448–53. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.05.123
95. Hwang JT, Ha J, Park IJ, Lee SK, Baik HW, Kim YM, et al. Apoptotic effect of EGCG in HT-29 colon cancer cells via AMPK signal pathway. Cancer Lett (2007) 247:115–21. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2006.03.030
96. Chen D, Pamu S, Cui Q, Chan TH, Dou QP. Novel epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) analogs activate AMP-activated protein kinase pathway and target cancer stem cells. Bioorg Med Chem (2012) 20:3031–7. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2012.03.002
97. Shimizu M, Sakai H, Shirakami Y, Yasuda Y, Kubota M, Terakura D, et al. Preventive effects of (-)-epigallocatechin gallate on diethylnitrosamine-induced liver tumorigenesis in obese and diabetic C57BL/KsJ-db/db Mice. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) (2011) 4:396–403. doi:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0331
98. Yang XW, Wang XL, Cao LQ, Jiang XF, Peng HP, Lin SM, et al. Green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin-3-gallate enhances 5-fluorouracil-induced cell growth inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Hepatol Res (2012) 42:494–501. doi:10.1111/j.1872-034X.2011.00947.x
99. Kim HS, Kim MJ, Kim EJ, Yang Y, Lee MS, Lim JS. Berberine-induced AMPK activation inhibits the metastatic potential of melanoma cells via reduction of ERK activity and COX-2 protein expression. Biochem Pharmacol (2012) 83:385–94. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2011.11.008
100. Park JJ, Seo SM, Kim EJ, Lee YJ, Ko YG, Ha J, et al. Berberine inhibits human colon cancer cell migration via AMP-activated protein kinase-mediated downregulation of integrin beta1 signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2012) 426:461–7. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.08.091
101. Khanal P, Oh WK, Thuong PT, Cho SD, Choi HS 24-Hydroxyursolic acid from the leaves of the Diospyros kaki (Persimmon) induces apoptosis by activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. Planta Med (2010) 76:689–93. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1240678
102. Khanal P, Oh WK, Yun HJ, Namgoong GM, Ahn SG, Kwon SM, et al. p-HPEA-EDA, a phenolic compound of virgin olive oil, activates AMP-activated protein kinase to inhibit carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis (2011) 32:545–53. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgr001
103. Kim YM, Hwang JT, Kwak DW, Lee YK, Park OJ. Involvement of AMPK signaling cascade in capsaicin-induced apoptosis of HT-29 colon cancer cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2007) 1095:496–503. doi:10.1196/annals.1397.053
104. Harada S, Kishimoto M, Kobayashi M, Nakamoto K, Fujita-Hamabe W, Chen HH, et al. Honokiol suppresses the development of post-ischemic glucose intolerance and neuronal damage in mice. J Nat Med (2012) 66:591–9. doi:10.1007/s11418-011-0623-x
105. Lin JN, Lin VC, Rau KM, Shieh PC, Kuo DH, Shieh JC, et al. Resveratrol modulates tumor cell proliferation and protein translation via SIRT1-dependent AMPK activation. J Agric Food Chem (2010) 58:1584–92. doi:10.1021/jf9035782
106. Lee YK, Lee WS, Kim GS, Park OJ. Anthocyanins are novel AMPKalpha1 stimulators that suppress tumor growth by inhibiting mTOR phosphorylation. Oncol Rep (2010) 24:1471–7.
107. Ding D, Zhang B, Meng T, Ma Y, Wang X, Peng H, et al. Novel synthetic baicalein derivatives caused apoptosis and activated AMP-activated protein kinase in human tumor cells. Org Biomol Chem (2011) 9:7287–91. doi:10.1039/c1ob06094e
108. Lin YC, Hung CM, Tsai JC, Lee JC, Chen YL, Wei CW, et al. Hispidulin potently inhibits human glioblastoma multiforme cells through activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). J Agric Food Chem (2010) 58:9511–7. doi:10.1021/jf1019533
109. Choi Y, Lee JH. The combination of tephrosin with 2-deoxy-D-glucose enhances the cytotoxicity via accelerating ATP depletion and blunting autophagy in human cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther (2011) 12:989–96. doi:10.4161/cbt.12.11.18364
Keywords: AMPK, cancer prevention, DNA repair, proliferation, apoptosis, phytochemicals
Citation: Kim I and He Y-Y (2013) Targeting the AMP-activated protein kinase for cancer prevention and therapy. Front. Oncol. 3:175. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00175
Received: 01 April 2013; Paper pending published: 29 April 2013;
Accepted: 21 June 2013; Published online: 15 July 2013.
Edited by:
Ann Bode, The Hormel Institute University of Minnesota and Mayo Clinic, USAReviewed by:
Giorgio Stassi, University of Palermo, ItalyTristan M. Sissung, National Cancer Institute, USA
Copyright: © 2013 Kim and He. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
*Correspondence: Yu-Ying He, Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 5067, Chicago, IL 60637, USA e-mail: yyhe@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu