Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Oncol.Rev.
Sec. Oncology Reviews: Reviews
Volume 18 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/or.2024.1427441

Interventions to improve access to cancer care in underserved populations in high income countries: A systematic review

Provisionally accepted
Anna Santos Salas Anna Santos Salas 1*Nahyeni Bassah Nahyeni Bassah 1Anna Pujadas Botey Anna Pujadas Botey 2,3Paula Robson Paula Robson 2,4Julia Beranek Julia Beranek 1Iqmat Iyiola Iqmat Iyiola 1Megan Kennedy Megan Kennedy 5
  • 1 Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
  • 2 Cancer Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • 3 School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • 4 Cancer Research & Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada
  • 5 Geoffrey and Robyn Sperber Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta Library, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Underserved populations both globally and in Canada face serious cancer inequities that result from systemic economic, environmental, and social conditions. These pose barriers in access to cancer care and lead to suboptimal cancer care experiences and outcomes. Knowledge of effective interventions to improve access to cancer care is needed to inform the design of tailored interventions for these populations. Aim: To identify interventions and programs to improve access to cancer care for underserved populations in high income countries with universal health coverage (UHC) and the United States (US) throughout the cancer care continuum. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA standards. We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria: quantitative and qualitative studies published in English in the last 10 years (2013-2023), describing interventions/programs to improve access to cancer care for underserved populations (18 years and over). We included studies in the US given the body of scholarship on equity in cancer care in that country. Screening, data extraction and analysis were undertaken by two independent reviewers. Results: Our search yielded 7,549 articles, and 74 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 56 were conducted in the US, 8 in Australia, 6 in Canada, and 4 in the UK. Most (90.5%) were quantitative studies and 47.3% were published between 2020-2023. Seven types of interventions were identified: patient navigation, education and counselling, virtual health, service redesign, financial support, improving geographical accessibility and multicomponent interventions. Interventions were mainly designed to mitigate language, distance, financial, lack of knowledge and cultural barriers. Most interventions focused on access to cancer screening, targeted rural populations, racialized groups and people with low socioeconomic status, and were conducted in community-based settings. The majority of interventions or programs significantly improved access to cancer care. Conclusion: Our systematic review findings suggest that interventions designed to remove specific barriers faced by underserved populations can improve access to cancer care. Few studies came from countries with UHC. Research is required to understand tailored interventions for underserved populations in countries with UHC.

    Keywords: Systematic review, health equity, Neoplasms, underserved populations, Health care access, High income countries, Universal health care

    Received: 03 May 2024; Accepted: 30 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Santos Salas, Bassah, Pujadas Botey, Robson, Beranek, Iyiola and Kennedy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Anna Santos Salas, Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.