AUTHOR=Yuan Rong , Liu Lei , Mi Jiao , Li Xue , Yang Fang , Mao Shifang TITLE=Development and validation of a risk prediction model for feeding intolerance in neurocritical patients with enteral nutrition JOURNAL=Frontiers in Nutrition VOLUME=11 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2024.1481279 DOI=10.3389/fnut.2024.1481279 ISSN=2296-861X ABSTRACT=Background

This study collects and analyzes clinical data on enteral nutrition therapy in neurocritical patients, develops and validates a feeding intolerance (FI) risk prediction model, and provides a theoretical basis for screening patients with high risk of feeding intolerance (FI) and delivering personalized care.

Methods

A convenience sampling method was employed to select 300 patients who were admitted to a tertiary hospital in China for early enteral nutrition therapy in the neurointensive care unit between April 2022 and December 2022. Independent risk factors for FI were identified using univariate and logistic regression analyses. A prediction model was established, and the goodness of fit and discriminant validity of the model were evaluated.

Results

The incidence of FI in neurocritical patients receiving enteral nutrition was 71%. Logistic regression analysis identified age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, mechanical ventilation, feeding via the nasogastric tube route, hyperglycemia, and low serum albumin as independent risk factors for the development of FI (p < 0.05). The predictive formula for FI risk was established as follows: Logit p = −14.737 + 1.184 × mechanical ventilation +2.309 × feeding route +1.650 × age + 1.336 × GCS tertile (6–8 points) + 1.696 × GCS tertile (3–5 points) + 1.753 × APACHE II score + 1.683 × blood glucose value +1.954 × serum albumin concentration. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test showed χ2 = 9.622, p = 0.293, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.941 (95% confidence interval: 0.912–0.970, p < 0.001). The optimal critical value was 0.767, with a sensitivity of 85.9%, a specificity of 90.8%, and a Youden index of 0.715.

Conclusion

The early enteral nutrition FI risk prediction model developed in this study demonstrated good predictive ability. This model can serve as a valuable reference for effectively assessing the risk of FI in neurocritical patients, thereby enhancing clinical outcomes.