AUTHOR=Wu Bo , Qiu Lanlan , Lin Yun , Lin Qian , Pan Yuxiong TITLE=The association between the dietary inflammatory index and cardiorespiratory fitness in United States young adults: a cross-sectional study from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study, 1999–2004 JOURNAL=Frontiers in Nutrition VOLUME=11 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2024.1442710 DOI=10.3389/fnut.2024.1442710 ISSN=2296-861X ABSTRACT=Background

Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a vital indicator of overall health and cardiovascular efficiency. Systemic inflammation significantly impacts CRF, and reducing systemic inflammation may serve as an effective strategy to improve CRF. Diet plays a crucial role in systemic inflammation, but daily dietary intake typically involves multiple elements rather than a single nutrient. The Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) provides an overall assessment of dietary inflammation on the basis of the anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory effects of the nutrients consumed. However, the relationship between DII and CRF is not yet well understood.

Aims

To examine the association between the DII and CRF.

Method

This study analyzed 3,087 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 1999 and 2002. The study subjects were divided into three distinct groups by DII tertile: T1 (n = 1,027), T2 (n = 1,029), and T3 (n = 1,031). The associations between DII levels and CRF were examined via logistic regression analysis and restricted cubic splines (RCSs).

Results

Elevated DII scores were significantly linked to low CRF levels. Compared with those in the lowest tertile, participants in the highest DII tertile exhibited a greater prevalence of low CRF (T1: 10.85%, T2: 16.32%, T3: 19.31%). In the model with full adjustments, elevated scores on the DII were consistently linked with a heightened likelihood of low CRF (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.07–1.28; P < 0.001). Compared with those in the T1 group, participants with higher DIIs had an increased risk of lower CRF (T2: OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.01–2.01, P = 0.046; T3: OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.22–2.40, P = 0.003). Additionally, a significant interaction (P = 0.045) between sex and the DII for low CRF was observed within the population.

Conclusion

A higher DII score is linked to an elevated risk of low CRF. Moreover, sex can impact CRF, with women being more prone to low CRF.