A Mediterranean-style dietary pattern is believed to have cancer-protective effects. We compared the prospective associations between adherence to four established Mediterranean diet indices and breast cancer risk (including total, postmenopausal, and hormone receptor positive cases) in women in the Framingham Offspring Study.
The four indices used two different approaches to measuring adherence to a Mediterranean diet: (a) scores based on the population-specific median intakes of Mediterranean diet-related foods in a given population (i.e., alternate Mediterranean Diet (aMED) index and Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS) index), and (b) scores based on compliance with recommended intakes of relevant foods from the Mediterranean diet pyramid [i.e., Mediterranean Diet (MeDiet) index and Mediterranean Style Dietary Pattern (MSDP) index]. Dietary data were derived from semiquantitative food frequency questionnaires collected in 1991-95. Participants included 1579 women aged ≤ 30 years who were free of prevalent cancer. Women were followed through 2014, and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for various confounders.
During a median follow-up of approximately 18 years, 87 breast cancer cases were documented. Women in the highest (vs. lowest) score category of the pyramid-based scores (i.e., MeDiet or MSDP) had approximately 45% statistically significantly lower breast cancer risks. These effects were even stronger for any hormone receptor positive cases using the MeDiet index (highest vs. lowest score categories: HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.22–0.90). Neither of the median intake-based scores (i.e., aMED, MDS) was associated with breast cancer risk.
Our results suggest that the methodology and the composition of Mediterranean diet indices influence their ability to assess conformity to this specific diet pattern and predict breast cancer risk.