AUTHOR=Vellinga Reina Elisabeth , Sam Matthijs , Verhagen Hans , Jakobsen Lea Sletting , Ravn-Haren Gitte , Sugimoto Minami , Torres Duarte , Katagiri Ryoko , Thu Beate Julie , Granby Kit , Hoekstra Jeljer , Temme Elisabeth Helena Maria 

TITLE=Increasing Seaweed Consumption in the Netherlands and Portugal and the Consequences for the Intake of Iodine, Sodium, and Exposure to Chemical Contaminants: A Risk-Benefit Study

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Nutrition

VOLUME=8

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2021.792923

DOI=10.3389/fnut.2021.792923

ISSN=2296-861X

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Background:</bold> Seaweed has a high potential for nourishing the future planet. However, besides being beneficial, it also contains adverse components; this poses the question whether consumption of seaweed foods overall contributes beneficially or detrimentally to human health, and hence if their consumption should be promoted or restricted.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> This study evaluated the impact of substituting regular foods with seaweed foods in the diet, both in terms of nutritional quality (<italic>via</italic> iodine and sodium) and food safety (<italic>via</italic> arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury). Food consumption data from the Netherlands and Portugal (adults aged &gt;18 years) were used, in which 10% of the amounts of pasta, bacon, and lettuce consumed were replaced by seaweed-derived products made from kelp (<italic>Saccharina latissima</italic>). Using Monte Carlo Risk Assessment software (MCRA), long-term nutrient intake and exposure to contaminants were assessed. The results obtained for the Netherlands and Portugal were compared with data from Japan, a country that has a high natural consumption of seaweed.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> This low-tier risk-benefit study reveals that an increased seaweed consumption (as assessed by the 10% replacement with seaweed products) has no consequences in terms of intake of sodium and exposure to cadmium, lead, and mercury, and the associated (absence of) adverse health aspects. The alternative scenario almost doubled the mean iodine intake in the Netherlands (to 300 μg/day) and Portugal (to 208 μg/day) and increased the average exposure to arsenic levels in the Netherlands (to 1.02 μg/kg bw/day) and Portugal (to 1.67 μg/kg bw/day).</p><p><bold>Conclusion:</bold> The intake of iodine and exposure to arsenic in the Netherland and Portugal were certainly higher due to the modeled increase of seaweed foods. If seaweed consumption increases close to the 10% substitution, the public health consequences thereof may trigger further research.</p>