- 1Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Radioisotope Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge, TN, United States
- 2Savannah River National Laboratory, Environmental and Legacy Management Directorate, Aiken, SC, United States
- 3Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
Editorial on the Research Topic
Applications of spectroscopy and chemometrics in nuclear materials analysis
Optical analysis techniques, including spectroscopy and image analysis, have many advantages when applied to the study of nuclear materials. They require small sample sizes, can be performed remotely, and can be proceduralized through consistent practice. Most importantly, they provide a wealth of information by generating multivariate data. For example, ultraviolet–visible–near-infrared absorbance spectroscopy of actinides in aqueous and organic solutions is dependent on the oxidation state, anionic complexation, and temperature. These variables are important for solution-based separation processes, and sensitivity to these factors, combined with online monitoring, can drive the efficiency and control of these processes (Tse et al., 2020; Tse et al., 2024). The morphology and chemical composition of actinide particles can also provide a vital clue to the mechanisms by which the particles were formed, providing forensic information on the origins of the particles (Mayer et al., 2012; Burr et al., 2021).
The extraction of the desired information from multivariate data is the domain of chemometric analysis. Chemometrics determine the empirical relationships between chemical or physical variations in a sample set and observed data. This method can be used to compensate for the variations, for example, by providing consistent concentration measurements of an actinide despite variations in matrix conditions. It can also be used to estimate the matrix conditions. The power of chemometrics rests in being able to avoid assigning specific mechanisms for the cause/effect relationship; merely including the cause over a range of levels consistent with those expected for subsequent samples is sufficient.
This Research Topic of seven papers illustrates the power of combining optical methods (spectroscopy or image analysis) with chemometrics to characterize nuclear materials in the context of process analysis and answering questions of provenance. It also provides several examples of how successfully an analysis can be achieved when there is limited knowledge of the samples (matrix conditions cannot be fully replicated) or limited resources to create a full calibration set.
Ly et al. presented a domain adaptation framework to improve the robustness of convolutional neural networks to provide faster and more consistent characterization of surface structures using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. The new approach is more suitable for nuclear forensics because it uses only unlabeled test samples to adapt a pretrained model, which supports data sensitivity.
Crouse et al. introduced a novel blind source separation algorithm to preprocess infrared absorbance spectra acquired online so that the process spectra looked like the training set. This method improved the nitrate quantification accuracy by helping the model cope with unexpected sources of variation in process spectra in tank samples at the Savannah River Site.
McNamara et al. probed UF6 hydrolysis intermediates by cooling the reaction to cryogenic temperatures to reduce the rate of hydrolysis using in situ Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Cryogenic layering was used to monitor the generation of reaction intermediates and elucidate the chemistry governing UF6 hydrolysis. Several previously unobserved bands were attributed to the formation of intermediates containing U–O–U bonds, which were directly converted to UO2F2.
Sadergaski et al. built partial least squares regression models for Np(III/IV/V/VI) in HNO3 using spectra corresponding to true Bi-chemical mixtures and spectra generated from additive combinations of pure component spectra. The performance of each modeling strategy was similar, suggesting that the spectral features from the potential interionic interactions of the Np ions were negligible. This methodology can be leveraged to efficiently build predictive chemometric models in multivalent metal nitrate systems for online monitoring applications.
Lamson McCombs et al. developed a Bayesian implementation of seemingly unrelated regression to successfully predict HNO3 concentration in a variety of processing conditions based on morphological features of PuO2. This work suggested that different levels of HNO3 may produce detectable differences in PuO2 particles by SEM images. The proposed technique processes SEM images using Morphological Analysis for Material Attribution software and then analyzes the data using functional seemingly unrelated regression. This technique is promising for the analysis of special nuclear materials in nuclear forensics applications and can be generalized for applications to other materials.
Villa-Aleman et al. developed versatile double-walled cells to enable the analysis of Pu-bearing compounds in a radiologically clean spectroscopy laboratory using advanced techniques, including Raman spectroscopy, diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy, diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, and gamma spectroscopy. New signatures in the conversion of Pu oxalates to PuO2 were observed by describing the molecular properties of the material, including calcination, crystallinity, purity, and age dating since the last calcination.
Sadergaski et al. tested a generalized optimal design approach for selecting calibration set samples in a two-factor design space for the quantification of U(VI) and HNO3 by Raman spectroscopy. A nonlinear support vector regression model outperformed a more traditional partial least squares regression model in terms of prediction performance and maintained an optimal number of samples in the training set to minimize time and materials.
These seven articles are published in the Research Topic, “Applications of Spectroscopy and Chemometrics in Nuclear Materials Analysis.” Each article highlights the growing interest in spectroscopy and chemometric methods for the analysis of nuclear materials in solid, liquid, and gas forms for advanced nuclear forensics, process monitoring, and fundamental science applications. Future studies focusing on modeling morphological features (e.g., SEM images) and chemical information (e.g., Raman spectroscopy) using sensor fusion strategies are encouraged. The editors of the Research Topic are open to further communication.
Author contributions
LS: Writing–review and editing. RL: Writing–review and editing. KH: Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Burr, T., Schwerdt, I., Sentz, K., McDonald, L., and Wilkerson, M. (2021). Overview of algorithms for using particle morphology in pre-detonation nuclear forensics. Algorithms 14, 340. doi:10.3390/a14120340
Mayer, K., Wallenius, M., and Varga, Z. (2012). Nuclear forensic science: correlating measurable material parameters to the history of nuclear material. Chem. Rev. 113, 884–900. doi:10.1021/cr300273f
Tse, P., Bessen, N. P., Hall, G. B., Seiner, B. N., Lumetta, G. J., Bryan, S. A., et al. (2024). A review of online monitoring within used nuclear fuel recycling processes. Solvent Extr. Ion. Exch. 42 (5), 347–380. doi:10.1080/07366299.2024.2395917
Keywords: spectroscopy, chemometrics, nuclear materials, actinide, monitoring, characterization
Citation: Sadergaski LR, Lascola RJ and Hartig KC (2025) Editorial: Applications of spectroscopy and chemometrics in nuclear materials analysis. Front. Nucl. Eng. 3:1544499. doi: 10.3389/fnuen.2024.1544499
Received: 13 December 2024; Accepted: 20 December 2024;
Published: 07 January 2025.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Edgar C. Buck, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (DOE), United StatesCopyright © 2025 Sadergaski, Lascola and Hartig. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Luke R. Sadergaski, c2FkZXJnYXNraWxyQG9ybmwuZ292