Top-down modulation of dichotic listening affects interhemispheric connectivity: an electroencephalography study

Osama Elyamany ^1* Jona Ruben Iffland ¹ Denise Elfriede Liesa Lockhofen ¹ Saskia Sophie Steinmann ² Gregor Leicht ² Christoph Mulert ¹

• ¹ Zentrum für Psychiatrie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen, Giessen, Germany
• ² University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

• please read through all the templates before choosing • pick the most relevant text template(s) from the following page and delete all others.• edit the text as necessary, ensuring that the original incorrect text is included for the record, please see the below. • please do not use any extra formatting when editing the templates, and only modify the red text unless absolutely necessary • submit to Frontiers following the instructions on this page.When the original text contained incorrect information, to preserve the scientific record, please include that text when editing the below templates. For example:There was a mistake in the Funding statement, an incorrect number was used. The correct number is "2015C03Bd051.". The publisher apologizes for this mistake.The original version of this article has been updated. In the published article, there was an error. In two instances within the discussion section, we mistakenly reversed "RE" and "LE". 1) A correction has been made to Discussion section, 4.1 Summary of results of the current study, Paragraph Number 2. This sentence previously stated: "This increase during RA, in comparison to NA, could be detected only in the case of LE, but not RE."The corrected sentence appears below: "This increase during RA, in comparison to NA, could be detected only in the case of RE, but not LE."2) A correction has been made to Discussion section, 4.5 Comparison of EEG results between brodmann areas (BAs) 41 and 42 (core results), Paragraph Number 1 (only one paragraph). This sentence previously stated: "Our results would support the second explanation, since the enhanced interhemispheric communication during RA, in comparison to NA, could be attributed to the contribution of LE, rather than RE."The corrected sentence appears below: "Our results would support the second explanation, since the enhanced interhemispheric communication during RA, in comparison to NA, could be attributed to the contribution of RE, rather than LE."The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.