The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
EDITORIAL article
Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Neural Technology
Volume 19 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1569216
This article is part of the Research Topic Datasets for Brain-Computer Interface Applications: Volume II View all 6 articles
Datasets for Brain-Computer Interface Applications: Volume 2 Non-invasive Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are an exciting technology that provides a channel for communication between the brain and computers. BCIs can be used for communication (
Provisionally accepted- 1 University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom
- 2 National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Moscow Oblast, Russia
- 3 Department of Psychology III, Faculty of Medicine, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
- 4 Neuraville Inc, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
However, research in BCI is continuously developing and there is a growing need for new publicly available datasets. Indeed, continuing development of BCI technology relies on advances made in many different research fields, which individually and collectively can contribute to improving all aspects of BCI systems including signal acquisition, processing, classification, and user interface design.Despite this, there remains only a small number of high-quality, publicly-available datasets on which new systems, tools, and technologies can be developed, evaluated, and compared. Furthermore, the relatively small size and number of these datasets introduce the risk of overfitting to methods developed and evaluated with these datasets. In other words, the reliability and reproducibility of BCI research may be held back by a lack and sparsity of publicly available datasets.To continue addressing this challenge, this special issue provides a second collection of publications and the respective datasets. They report on physiological datasets recorded during development, training, and evaluation of non-invasive BCI systems from BCI research labs around the world. Data were collected with electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Stimulus presentation within diverse experimental paradigms cover different sensory modalities .The paper by Botrel and colleagues describes a study on the effects of time and visualisation techniques within a neurofeedback paradigm on alpha downregulation and sense of presence in virtual reality. Twenty-five participants were trained for several sessions in two different setups. While subjects learned to control their parietal alpha, no effect on the sense of presence were observed. (Botrel et al., 2025).Functional near infrared spectroscopy is used in the paper by Ning and colleagues, who describe data recorded during viewing of complex audio-visual stimuli. A group of 16 adults saw videos of complex natural scenes presented simultaneously on three monitors. Participants were cued to attend to one of the three videos and an initial decoding approach showed above chance level accuracy in determining the participants attentional focus during the tasks (Ning et al., 2025).Two papers of our special issue involve event-related potentials (ERP). In the first study by Reichert and colleagues, a toolbox for decoding ERP-based BCI commands is presented. The toolbox uses canonical correlation analysis and is evaluated on four publicly available BCI datasets (Reichert et al., 2024).The second study by Lee and colleagues presents a new dataset recorded from a large cohort of 84 participants who were attempting to use an ERP-based BCI to control a variety of home appliances. Data were collected in a variety of different environments, including the use of LCD display technology to present BCI interfaces, augmented reality, and home environments; significant control was achieved in most cases (Lee et al., 2024).Finally, a paper by Peguero and colleagues presents a dataset recorded during use of an SSVEPbased BCI by a cohort of 27 participants. Different stimuli modulations were used and decoding performances were compared across modulation methods. The results showed that modulating stimuli in a rectangular or sinusoidal on-off pattern and decoding with filter band canonical correlation analysis produces the highest decoding accuracy (Chailloux Peguero et al., 2023).We hope this second volume of openly available datasets will enable further novel developments and applications of BCI technology, as well as extensive validation studies of current and future BCIs.
Keywords: BCI - Brain Computer Interface, EEG, ERP, SSVEP (Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential), Data
Received: 31 Jan 2025; Accepted: 05 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Daly, Matran-Fernandez, Lebedev, Kübler and Valeriani. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Ian Daly, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom
Ana Matran-Fernandez, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.