
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
METHODS article
Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Perception Science
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1543538
This article is part of the Research Topic Exploring the Neural Mechanisms of Sensory-Cognitive Associations: Bridging Sensory Perception and Higher Cognitive Functions View all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Hyper-or-hypo-reactivity to sensory input, is a diagnostic criterion for autism spectrum disorder, however, it is still not fully characterized despite its relevance for patients' quality of life.When considering neurodevelopment, the sensory reactivity in autism is often assessed through parental reports, and only few evidences have been collected through standardized protocols. The Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST), is a standardized protocol used to quantify the sensory function by the assessment of perceptive and pain threshold with calibrated sensory stimuli. To date, only few study investigated sensory reactivity in autism through QST, and only one considered adolescent, while none included children in the sample.We aimed at study pain and sensory reactivity perception in children diagnosed with autism, through the QST protocol. Moreover, we wanted to measure central reactivity to painful stimuli, by measuring electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to painful thermal stimuli, in order to explore the relationship between subjective reactivity (i.e. reactions to sensory stimuli), and central processing of sensory stimuli (i.e. EEG responses). Finally, we aim at explore the relationship between parents reports, the subjective reports and the EEG responses.Discussion: With this study, we can expand previous knowledge concerning the sensory profile of children and adolescents with autism. Moreover, to deepen the relationship between perceptive threshold in children with autism, with the reactivity of the central nervous system, could contribute to understand causal mechanism of perceptual differences observed in autism.: NCT06659731 1 Cohen et al., 2021) and thus it is for clinical population, as people with autism. Recently, it has been highlighted (Moore, 2015) the need for a systematic investigation of pain in autism through standardized and more reproducible methodologies. Previously, it has been reported that different outcome measures have been considered by different studies, such as parent reports, self reports, sensory threshold, but also objective measures, increasing variability and reducing consistency across Eliminato: : (1) sensory adaptive, (2) generalized sensory 61 differences (3) taste and smell sensitivity, (4) under-responsive and 62 sensation seeking, and (5) movement difficulties with low energy.
Keywords: Pain, QST, EEG, autism, ERPs, neurodevelopment, perception Moreover, even if they all used to measure perception
Received: 11 Dec 2024; Accepted: 25 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Nicolardi, Fanizza, Accogli, Scoditti and TRABACCA. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
ANTONIO TRABACCA, Eugenio Medea (IRCCS), Bosisio Parini, 23842, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.