![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Brain Imaging Methods
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1537026
This article is part of the Research Topic Advancing High-Resolution 3T MRI for Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience View all 3 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: A full understanding of how we see our world remains a fundamental research question in vision neuroscience. While topographic profiling has allowed us to identify different visual areas, the exact functional characteristics and organisation of areas up in the visual hierarchy (beyond V1 & V2) is still debated. It is hypothesised that visual area V4 represents a vital intermediate stage of processing spatial and curvature information preceding object recognition. Advancements in magnetic resonance imaging hardware and acquisition techniques (e.g., non-BOLD functional MRI) now permits the capture of cortical layer-specific functional properties and organisation of the human brain (including the visual system) at high precision. Methods: Here, we use functional cerebral blood volume measures to study the modularity in how responses to contours (curvature) are organised within area V4 of the human brain. To achieve this at 3 Tesla (a clinically relevant field strength) we utilise optimised high-resolution 3D-Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) Vascular Space Occupancy (VASO) measurements. Results: Data here provide the first evidence of curvature domains in human V4 that are consistent with previous findings from non-human primates. We show that VASO and BOLD tSNR maps for functional imaging align with high field equivalents, with robust time series of changes to visual stimuli measured across the visual cortex. V4 curvature preference maps for VASO show strong modular organisation compared to BOLD imaging contrast. It is noted that BOLD has a much lower sensitivity (due to known venous vasculature weightings) and specificity to stimulus contrast. We show evidence that curvature domains persist across the cortical depth. The work advances our understanding of the role of mid-level area V4 in human processing of curvature and shape features. Impact: Knowledge of how the functional architecture and hierarchical integration of local contours (curvature) contribute to formation of shapes can inform computational models of object recognition. Techniques described here allow for quantification of individual differences in functional architecture of mid-level visual areas to help drive a better understanding of how changes in functional brain organisation relate to difference in visual perception.
Keywords: fMRI, laminar, Layers, VASO, visual features, curvature, columns, 3Tesla
Received: 29 Nov 2024; Accepted: 10 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zamboni, Watson, Stirnberg, Huber, Formisano, Goebel, Kennerley and Morland. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Elisa Zamboni, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.