![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Sleep and Circadian Rhythms
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1509822
This article is part of the Research Topic Home Cage-based Phenotyping in Rodents: Innovation, Standardization, Reproducibility and Translational Improvement – Volume II View all 8 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The present study aims to identify differences in behavioral profiles in post-pubertal C57BL/6J males and female mice across distinct phases of the reproductive cycle in a home cage environment. To reduce human bias, we used an automated behavioral analysis system HomeCageScan from CleverSys Inc. Mice were monitored continuously, and resulting data were summarized across 24-hour, light, and dark cycles. Behavioral activities of each period were analysed using hierarchical clustering, factor analysis, and principal component analysis. Females exhibited higher levels of physically demanding activities, including ambulatory and exploratory movements, particularly during estrus and metestrus, with estrus showing up to 30% more activity than males. In contrast, males consistently engaged in more sleep-related behaviors across all phases, with significantly higher engagement during the light cycle compared to females in proestrus and estrus (p < 0.0001); the extent of this sex difference was greater during proestrus and estrus than in metestrus and diestrus (p < 0.01). Notably, distinct patterns of sleep fragmentation were observed, with females experiencing greater disruptions during the light cycle, while males showed similar disruptions during the dark cycle. Feeding and resourcing behaviors were highest in males, showing up to 20% increase compared to cycling females, as well as significantly engaging in habituation-related behaviors such as feeding and digging. Interphase differences were observed within females, such as a significant increase of habituation-related activities during estrus compared to proestrus and diestrus (p<0.05), while during the dark cycle, these activities peaked during the diestrus phase (p<0.05). Female mice in the metestrus phase exhibited more sleep-related behaviors than those in proestrus. Our study has revealed prevalent behavioral differences due to sex, and inter-phase variations by employing a continuous monitoring approach designed to reduce bias. This methodology ensures a comprehensive understanding of natural behavioral patterns and strategies.
Keywords: Behavior, Sex, Estrous, mouse model, male, female
Received: 11 Oct 2024; Accepted: 11 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Khatiz, Tomlinson, Ruzhytska, Croft, Amrani, Dunn, Mendrek and Gris. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Denis Gris, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.