
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1488682
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
What are good control stimuli for music perception research? Systematic evaluations of control suitability remain limited. We wanted to examine if control stimuli (brown, pink, white noise, and voice recordings) lead to different emotional ratings in themselves. Across two separate studies (n = 84, and 1280, respectively), participants assessed brown, pink, and white noise and voice recordings using a music-emotional perception scale with variations. We used the GEMS-9 scale, and the GEMS-9 scale with the second-order factors 'sublime', 'uneasy', and 'vital'.Results from our two studies show that brown noise was considered more sublime than white and pink noise, while white noise was considered more uneasy than brown noise, pink noise, and voice recordings in both studies.In conclusion, brown, pink, and white noise is rated emotionally above 3 on unease on a scale from 1 to 7. This means that none of the noise stimuli had minimal emotional ratings and therefore had an emotional effect in themselves. Out of the three noise stimuli, white noise had the highest ratings of unease across both studies. Only voice recordings were considered neutral, defined as having consistently minimal emotional ratings in both studies.
Keywords: control stimuli, Control condition, Brown Noise, pink noise, white noise, GEMS-9
Received: 30 Aug 2024; Accepted: 31 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Færøvik, Vikene and Specht. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Ulvhild Helena Færøvik, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.