The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Neural Technology
Volume 18 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1512950
Spinal Neuromodulation using Ultra Low Frequency (ULF) Waveform Inhibits Sensory Signalling to the Thalamus and Preferentially Reduces Aberrant Firing of Thalamic Neurons in a Model of Neuropathic Pain
Provisionally accepted- 1 Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- 2 Zenith Neurotech Ltd., London, United Kingdom
- 3 Deparment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
- 4 Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Indiana, United States
- 5 Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
- 6 Presidio Medical Inc., San Mateo, United States
- 7 King's College London, London, England, United Kingdom
Many forms of chronic pain remain refractory to existing pharmacotherapies and electrical neuromodulation. We have recently reported the clinical efficacy of a novel form of analgesic electrical neuromodulation that uses ultra-low frequency (ULFTM) biphasic current and studied its effects on sensory nerve fibers. Here, we show that in anesthetised rats, epidural ULF current reversibly inhibits activation of neurons in the thalamus receiving sensory spinothalamic input. In naïve rats, recordings were made from 39 thalamic neurons, targeting the ventral posterolateral (VPL) nucleus. Responses to electrical stimulation of hind limb receptive fields were reduced in 25 of 32 (78%) neurons tested with lumbar epidural ULF neuromodulation. Cells preferentially responsive to low intensity stimulation were more likely to be found than cells responding to a range of stimulus intensities, or high intensity only; and low threshold responses were more likely to be inhibited by ULF than high threshold responses. On-going activity unrelated to hindlimb stimulation, observed in 17 of 39 neurons in naïve animals (44%), was reduced by lumbar epidural ULF current in only 3 of 14 (21%) neurons tested with ULF. By contrast, in rats with a well-characterised neuropathic injury, spinal nerve ligation (SNL), we found a much higher incidence of on-going activity in thalamic neurons: 53 of 55 neurons (96%) displayed firing unrelated to hindlimb stimulation. In this group, ULF current reduced thalamic neurone discharge rate in 19 of 29 (66%) neurons tested. In sham-operated animals, the incidence of such activity in thalamic neurons and the effect of ULF current were not significantly different from the naïve group. We conclude firstly that ULF current can acutely and reversibly interrupt signalling between sensory afferent fibers and relay neurons of the thalamus. Second, ongoing activity of thalamic neurons increases dramatically in the early stages following neuropathic injury. Third, this novel form of neuromodulation preferentially attenuates pathological thalamic activity in this neuropathic model compared to normal activity in naïve and sham-operated animals. This study, therefore, demonstrates that epidural ULF current can reduce nerve injury-related abnormal activity reaching the brain. These findings help advance understanding of possible mechanisms for the analgesic effects of ULF neuromodulation.
Keywords: Thalamus, ULF TM neuromodulation, Spinal Cord Stimulation, inhibition, Neuropathic, Pain
Received: 17 Oct 2024; Accepted: 04 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Jones, Matthews, Lempka, Verma, Harris and McMahon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Martyn Jones, Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.