Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Neurodevelopment
Volume 18 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1485499
This article is part of the Research Topic Advances in DYRK1A Syndrome: Underlying Mechanisms, Disease Models, and Novel Therapeutic Approaches View all articles

Characterizing Executive Functioning and Associated Behaviors in Individuals with Dual-Specificity Tyrosine Phosphorylation-Regulated Kinase 1A (DYRK1A) Syndrome

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • 2 Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, United States
  • 3 School of Medicine, Indiana University Bloomington, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
  • 4 University of South Carolina, Columbia, Missouri, United States
  • 5 Peking University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
  • 6 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Seattle, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: DYRK1A, a protein kinase located on human chromosome 21, plays a role in postembryonic neuronal development and degeneration. Alterations to DYRK1A have been consistently associated with cognitive functioning and neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g., autism, intellectual disability). However, the broader cognitive and behavioral phenotype of DYRK1A syndrome requires further characterization. Specifically, executive functioning, or cognitive processes that are necessary for goal-directed behavior, has not yet been characterized in this population.Methods: Individuals with DYRK1A variants (n=29; ages 4 to 21 years) were assessed with a standardized protocol with multiple measures of executive functioning: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function Schedule, and chronologically age-appropriate caregiver-report forms of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) and Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA). We first examined the feasibility and appropriateness of established executive functioning measures among participants with DYRK1A syndrome to inform selection of executive functioning tools in future research. We then characterized executive functioning among the group, including associations with other phenotypic features.Results: Neurocognitive assessments of executive functioning were deemed infeasible due to cognitive and verbal functioning. Caregiver-report revealed elevated executive functioning concerns related to self-monitoring, working memory, and planning/organization on the BRIEF, and attention and ADHD on the CBCL. Only two participants had existing ADHD diagnoses; however, 5 participants (out of 10 participants with data) exceeded the cutoff on the BRIEF, 13 individuals (out of 27 with data) exceeded the cutoff on the ASEBA ADHD subscale, and 18 exceeded the cutoff on the ASEBA attention subscale. There was concordance between ADHD diagnosis and the ASEBA, but not BRIEF. Executive functioning was correlated with nonverbal IQ and autism traits.Discussion: Objective measures of executive functioning are needed for individuals with intellectual disability who are nonverbal and/or have motor limitations. Diagnostic overshadowing, or the tendency to attribute all problems to intellectual disability and to leave other co-existing conditions, such as executive functioning challenges or ADHD, undiagnosed, is common. Phenotypic characterization of executive functioning is therefore important for our understanding of DYRK1A syndrome and for ensuring that caregivers' concerns are addressed, and individuals receive the clinical services that best meet their needs.

    Keywords: DYRK1A, executive functioning, ADHD, autism, cognitive functioning

    Received: 23 Aug 2024; Accepted: 17 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Rea, Webb, Kurtz-Nelson, Hudac, Bernier, Miles, Earl, Whiting, Eayrs, Jr., Johansson, Wang, Eichler and Neuhaus. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Emily Neuhaus, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195-4550, Washington, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.