Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Visual Neuroscience
Volume 18 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1457297

Meridional Anisotropy in Contrast Sensitivity and Visual Evoked Potential in Adults with High Myopic Astigmatism

Provisionally accepted
Siu Sang Anthony Wu Siu Sang Anthony Wu 1Tsz Wing Leung Tsz Wing Leung 1,2,3*
  • 1 Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, SAR China
  • 2 Centre for Eye and Vision Research Limited (CEVR), Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China
  • 3 Research Centre for SHARP Vision, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, SAR China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Purpose: Astigmatism can lead to meridional amblyopia, an orientation-specific visual deficit. This study investigated the effects of astigmatism on meridional anisotropy in contrast sensitivity (CS) and steady-state visual evoked potential (ssVEP) across a range of spatial frequencies.Methods: Thirty-two young adults with a best-corrected distance visual acuity of logMAR 0 or better were categorized into two groups: highly astigmatic (HAS, n = 16) with spherical-equivalent error (SE) ≥ -6.00 D and a cylindrical error (Cyl) ≥ 2.00 DC, and non-astigmatic (NAS, n = 16) with SE ≥ -6.00 D but Cyl ≤ 0.50 DC. We assessed CS using a spatial four-alternative forced-choice procedure and recorded ssVEP at spatial frequencies ranging from 0.6 to 12 cycles per degree (cpd) for horizontal and vertical gratings. The Area Under Log Contrast Sensitivity Function (AULCSF) and spatial frequency cutoff for the CS were also calculated.The HAS group exhibited significantly lower CS for horizontal compared to vertical gratings at most spatial frequencies (p < 0.045 for 0.6-6 cpd), also reflected in a lower AULCSF (p = 0.01). This meridional anisotropy in CS was absent in the NAS group for both AULCSF and individual spatial frequencies, except at 0.6 cpd (p = 0.005). Spatial frequency cutoff did not differ between orientations for either group (p > 0.94). Conversely, ssVEP amplitudes were consistently lower for horizontal than vertical gratings in both groups, regardless of the presence of astigmatism (p < 0.05).Meridional anisotropy in contrast sensitivity was observed only in highly astigmatic participants, whereas meridional anisotropy in ssVEP was present in both highly astigmatic and nonastigmatic groups. This discrepancy between psychophysical and electrophysiological measures may be related to the static versus flickering nature of the stimuli and warrants further investigation.

    Keywords: Astigmatism, Meridional Anisotropy, Meridional Visual Deficits, Contrast Sensitivity, visual evoked potential

    Received: 30 Jun 2024; Accepted: 24 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Wu and Leung. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Tsz Wing Leung, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, SAR China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.