Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Gut-Brain Axis
Volume 18 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1453325
This article is part of the Research Topic Gut-Brain Axis Correlates, Mediators, and Moderators of Stress Resilience or Vulnerability View all 3 articles

Cognotoxemia: Endotoxemia and Gender Predict Changes in Working Memory Performance in Healthy Adults

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States
  • 2 Department of Biobehavioral Health, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States
  • 3 Center For Healthy Aging, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States
  • 4 Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States
  • 5 College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Examining the contribution of peripheral systems to cognitive function under healthy circumstances may improve our understanding of the systems that confer risk or resilience in diseased states. Endotoxemia -a pro-inflammatory response to the translocation of bacteria that reside in the gut on other sources (e.g., respiratory tract; infection) into the blood -was hypothesized to relate to worsened cognitive functioning. Gender was explored as a moderator. Methods: A sample of 162 healthy adults (25-65 years old) provided plasma, from which a measure of endotoxemia was determined [i.e., the ratio of lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) to soluble cluster of differentiation 14 receptors (sCD14)]. Participants performed an array of laboratory and ambulatory cognitive tasks at three timepoints, each separated by 9 months. Two sets of multilevel models were used: Prospective models, linking endotoxemia at baseline with changes in cognition across time, and coupling models, which examine correlations of endotoxemia with cognition across time.Results: A prospective model indicated lower levels of endotoxemia at baseline predicted improvements in working memory across the three timepoints; higher levels were associated with no change in cognitive performance. Gender was not found to modulate this finding. Interestingly, a coupling analysis of endotoxemia and gender across time showed that in men, those with higher endotoxemia performed better at the working memory task overall; in women, working memory performance was similar regardless of endotoxemia level.This work provides initial evidence that endotoxemia may be associated with a dampening of improvement in working memory, improvement consistent with practice effects, which should be expected in a sample of healthy, relatively young adults. The findings also provide preliminary evidence that, at least for men, higher degrees of endotoxemia are not inherently negative, and may link with short term positive outcomes for working memory.

    Keywords: Cognition, Endotoxemia, working memory, gut-brain axis, biomarker

    Received: 22 Jun 2024; Accepted: 17 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 McDonnell, Graham-Engeland, Sliwinski, Engeland and Knight. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Erik L. Knight, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-0345, Colorado, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.