Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Translational Neuroscience
Volume 18 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1431406
This article is part of the Research Topic Central Nervous System Diseases and Anesthesia View all 7 articles

The characteristics of auditorial event-related potential under propofol sedation associated with preoperative cognitive performance in glioma patients

Provisionally accepted
Xinxin Wang Xinxin Wang Wanning Yang Wanning Yang Minyu Jian Minyu Jian Yi Liang Yi Liang Zuocheng Yang Zuocheng Yang Yiwei Chen Yiwei Chen Bo Ma Bo Ma Chengwei Wang Chengwei Wang Zonggang Hou Zonggang Hou Zhenghai Deng Zhenghai Deng Haiyang Liu Haiyang Liu Jian Xie Jian Xie Ruquan Han Ruquan Han *
  • Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Glioma patients often experience neurocognitive deficits, particularly mild cognitive impairment (MCI), which affects their perioperative safety. The use of auditory event-related potentials (AERPs) might be a promising method for reflecting perioperative cognitive function in patients, even under unresponsive sedation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationships between the AERP under sedation and preoperative cognitive performance in glioma patients.Methods: Patients with primary supratentorial gliomas who were scheduled for elective craniotomy under general anesthesia were included in this prospective observational study. The patients were categorized into MCI and non-MCI groups based on their preoperative Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. AERP characteristics, including mismatch negativity (MMN), P300, and event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) in the theta bands, were analyzed under different propofol-induced sedation conditions. Differences in these parameters between groups and their relationships with preoperative cognitive performance were subsequently investigated.Results: Twenty-nine eligible patients were included in the analysis. Compared to that in the non-MCI group, the average amplitude of the MMN component evoked by the novel stimulus significantly decreased during the recovery period in the MCI group (-3.895±1.961 μV vs. -1.617±1.831 μV, p=0.003). Theta-ERSPs also differed between the two groups under standard (0.021±0.658 μV2•Hz-1 vs. 0.515±0.622 μV2•Hz-1, p=0.048) and novel (0.212±0.584 μV2•Hz-1 vs. 0.823±0.931 μV2•Hz-1, p=0.041) stimulation conditions under light sedation. After correcting for age, education level, site of lesion, WHO pathological grade and combined symptomatic epilepsy as confounders, the frontal theta-ERSP induced by standard and novel stimuli under light sedation was inversely related to the preoperative MoCA score (standard stimuli: β=-0.491, p=0.011; novel stimuli: β=-0.594, p=0.007), as was the average MMN amplitude induced by novel stimuli during the recovery period (β=-0.356, p=0.035).Conclusions: The AERP neural response characteristics of glioma patients during propofol sedation were associated with preoperative cognitive performance, which might be a potential neurophysiological indicator for monitoring perioperative cognitive function, especially theta-ERSP.

    Keywords: Propofol sedation, Mild Cognitive Impairment, auditory event-related potentials, theta-ERSP, Glioma

    Received: 11 May 2024; Accepted: 28 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Wang, Yang, Jian, Liang, Yang, Chen, Ma, Wang, Hou, Deng, Liu, Xie and Han. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Ruquan Han, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.