Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Neuropharmacology
Volume 18 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1428675
This article is part of the Research Topic Potential Therapeutic Approaches of Female Hormones in the Brain View all articles

Effect of Estradiol with or without Micronized Progesterone on Cholinergic-Related Cognitive Performance in Postmenopausal Women

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Center for Cognitive Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
  • 2 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States
  • 3 Department of Psychiatry, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States
  • 4 Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Nashville, Tennessee, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Women are at a higher risk of developing Alzheimer's disease (AD), and the decline in estrogens post-menopause is thought of as a factor increasing this risk. Estradiol (E2) is important in supporting cholinergic neuronal integrity, and cholinergic functioning may be negatively impacted following the loss of E2 post-menopause. The use of exogenous E2 has been observed to enhance cholinergically mediated cognitive performance in healthy post-menopausal women, which indicates a potentially protective mechanism. However, E2 is often co-administered with progestin or progesterone to prevent endometrial proliferation. Progesterone/progestins have previously been shown to have a detrimental effect on E2-mediated biological and cognitive effects mediated by cholinergic systems in preclinical models, therefore the present study aimed to assess whether progesterone would modify the effect of E2 to influence cognition during cholinergic blockade. Twenty participants completed 3months of oral E2 treatment with micronized progesterone (mPRO) or with placebo (PLC) in a repeated-measures within-subjects crossover design, in which they also completed five anticholinergic challenge days per hormone treatment condition. During the challenge participants were administered low or high doses of the nicotinic cholinergic antagonist mecamylamine, the muscarinic cholinergic antagonist scopolamine, or placebo. Following drug administration participants performed cognitive tests sensitive to cholinergic tone, assessing attention, episodic memory, and working memory. Significant decrements were found on some tasks when participants were taking E2+mPRO compared to E2 alone. Specially Specifically, under more challenging task conditions and larger anticholinergic doses participants showed poorer performance on the Critical Flicker Fusion task, and the Stroop test, and more responded more conservatively on the N-back working memory task. Other tasks showed no differences between treatments under cholinergic blockade. The findings show that mPRO, when taken in concert with E2, was detrimental to effortful cognitive performance, in the presence of cholinergic blockade. These results are important for assessing the impact of combined postmenopausal hormone treatment on cognitive functionperformance that is , dependent on cholinergic functioning after menopause and the potential 46 of hormone treatment to impact the long-term risk for cognitive decline.

    Keywords: Estradiol, Progesterone, cholinergic system, Memory, Attention, Post-menopause

    Received: 06 May 2024; Accepted: 18 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Conley, Vega, Johnson, Dumas and Newhouse. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Paul Newhouse, Center for Cognitive Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.