Registration to a standardized template (i.e. “normalization”) is a critical step when performing neuroimaging studies. We present a comparative study involving the evaluation of general-purpose registration algorithms for pediatric patients with shunt treated hydrocephalus. Our sample dataset presents a number of intersecting challenges for registration, representing the potentially large deformations to both brain structures and overall brain shape, artifacts from shunts, and morphological differences corresponding to age. The current study assesses the normalization accuracy of shunt-treated hydrocephalus patients using freely available neuroimaging registration tools.
Anatomical neuroimages from eight pediatric patients with shunt-treated hydrocephalus were normalized. Four non-linear registration algorithms were assessed in addition to the preprocessing steps of skull-stripping and bias-correction. Registration accuracy was assessed using the Dice Coefficient (DC) and Hausdorff Distance (HD) in subcortical and cortical regions.
A total of 592 registrations were performed. On average, normalizations performed using the brain extracted and bias-corrected images had a higher DC and lower HD compared to full head/ non-biased corrected images. The most accurate registration was achieved using SyN by ANTs with skull-stripped and bias corrected images. Without preprocessing, the DARTEL Toolbox was able to produce normalized images with comparable accuracy. The use of a pediatric template as an intermediate registration did not improve normalization.
Using structural neuroimages from patients with shunt-treated pediatric hydrocephalus, it was demonstrated that there are tools which perform well after specified pre-processing steps were taken. Overall, these results provide insight to the performance of registration programs that can be used for normalization of brains with complex pathologies.