Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Neuroprosthetics
Volume 18 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1402154
This article is part of the Research Topic Brain Machine Interfaces View all articles

Group-member Selection for RSVP-based Collaborative Brain-Computer Interfaces

Provisionally accepted
Yuan Si Yuan Si 1,2Zhenyu Wang Zhenyu Wang 1Guiying Xu Guiying Xu 1,2*Zikai Wang Zikai Wang 1,2*Tianheng Xu Tianheng Xu 1,3*Ting Zhou Ting Zhou 1,3,4*Honglin Hu Honglin Hu 1,2*
  • 1 Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Pudong, China
  • 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, Beijing, China
  • 3 Shanghai Frontier Innovation Research Institute, Shanghai, China
  • 4 School of Microelectronics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The brain-computer interface (BCI) systems based on rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) have been widely utilized for the detection of target and non-target images. Collaborative brain-computer interface (cBCI) effectively fuses electroencephalogram (EEG) data from multiple users to overcome the limitations of low single-user performance in single-trial event-related potential (ERP) detection in RSVP-based BCI systems. In a multi-user cBCI system, a superior group mode may lead to better collaborative performance and lower system cost. However, the key factors that enhance the collaboration capabilities of multiple users and how to further use these factors to optimize group mode remain unclear.Approach: This study proposed a group-member selection strategy to optimize the group mode and improve the system performance for RSVP-based cBCI. In contrast to the conventional grouping of collaborators at random, the group-member selection strategy enabled pairing each user with a better collaborator and allowed tasks to be done with fewer collaborators. Initially, we introduced the maximum individual capability and maximum collaborative capability (MIMC) to select optimal pairs, improving the system classification performance. The sequential forward floating selection (SFFS) combined with MIMC then selected a sub-group, aiming to reduce the hardware and labor expenses in the cBCI system. Moreover, the hierarchical discriminant component analysis (HDCA) was used as a classifier for within-session conditions, and the Euclidean space data alignment (EA) was used to overcome the problem of inter-trial variability for cross-session analysis.In this paper, we verified the effectiveness of the proposed group-member selection strategy on a public RSVP-based cBCI dataset. For the two-user matching task, the proposed MIMC had a significantly higher AUC and TPR and lower FPR than the common random grouping mode and the potential group-member selection method. Moreover, the SFFS with MIMC enabled a trade-off between maintaining performance and reducing the number of system users.

    Keywords: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), electroencephalogram (EEG), event-related potentials (ERP), rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), collaborative brain-computer interfaces (cBCIs), group-member selection

    Received: 17 Mar 2024; Accepted: 30 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Si, Wang, Xu, Wang, Xu, Zhou and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Guiying Xu, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Pudong, China
    Zikai Wang, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Pudong, China
    Tianheng Xu, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Pudong, China
    Ting Zhou, School of Microelectronics, Shandong University, Jinan, 250101, Shandong Province, China
    Honglin Hu, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Pudong, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.