RETRACTED: Comparing the predictive value of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parametric response mapping and conventional perfusion magnetic resonance imaging for clinical outcomes in patients with chronic ischemic stroke
An Expression of Concern on
Comparing the predictive value of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parametric response mapping and conventional perfusion magnetic resonance imaging for clinical outcomes in patients with chronic ischemic stroke
by He, R., Zhou, J., Xu, X., Wei, X., Wang, F., and Li, Y. (2023). Front. Neurosci. 17:1177044. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1177044
With this notice, Frontiers acknowledges concerns received by the office regarding data ownership and integrity of the article “Comparing the predictive value of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parametric response mapping and conventional perfusion magnetic resonance imaging for clinical outcomes in patients with chronic ischemic stroke” published on 25 May 2023. In accordance with COPE guidelines, Frontiers has requested an investigation by Shanghai Jia Tong University and Grenoble University. Once the outcome of this investigation is made available to Frontiers, we will act accordingly.
UPDATE: This article has now been retracted. Please find the full retraction here: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1504798
Citation: Frontiers Editorial Office (2024) Expression of concern: Comparing the predictive value of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parametric response mapping and conventional perfusion magnetic resonance imaging for clinical outcomes in patients with chronic ischemic stroke. Front. Neurosci. 17:1354585. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1354585
Received: 12 December 2023; Accepted: 13 December 2023;
Published: 04 January 2024.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2024 Frontiers Editorial Office. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Frontiers Editorial Office, research.integrity@frontiersin.org