Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Neurosci., 04 January 2024
Sec. Brain Imaging Methods
This article is part of the Research Topic New Challenges and Future Perspectives in Brain Imaging Methods View all 15 articles

Expression of concern: Comparing the predictive value of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parametric response mapping and conventional perfusion magnetic resonance imaging for clinical outcomes in patients with chronic ischemic stroke

With this notice, Frontiers acknowledges concerns received by the office regarding data ownership and integrity of the article “Comparing the predictive value of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parametric response mapping and conventional perfusion magnetic resonance imaging for clinical outcomes in patients with chronic ischemic stroke” published on 25 May 2023. In accordance with COPE guidelines, Frontiers has requested an investigation by Shanghai Jia Tong University and Grenoble University. Once the outcome of this investigation is made available to Frontiers, we will act accordingly.

UPDATE: This article has now been retracted. Please find the full retraction here: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1504798

Citation: Frontiers Editorial Office (2024) Expression of concern: Comparing the predictive value of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parametric response mapping and conventional perfusion magnetic resonance imaging for clinical outcomes in patients with chronic ischemic stroke. Front. Neurosci. 17:1354585. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1354585

Received: 12 December 2023; Accepted: 13 December 2023;
Published: 04 January 2024.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2024 Frontiers Editorial Office. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Frontiers Editorial Office, research.integrity@frontiersin.org

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.