Ángela Fontán-Lozano- 1Department of Physiology, School of Biology, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain
- 2Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen Del Rocío, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain
Editorial on the Research Topic
Global excellence in neurogenesis: Europe
We are highlighting the latest advances in neurogenesis worldwide and reflecting on the future challenges faced by transboundary researchers. This Research Topic address the advancement of neurogenesis research in Europe, and presents some examples of recent work regarding several aspects of this investigation field, which can be assigned to the following subthemes: phylogeny, normal/disease physiology, and new avenues to analyse neurogenesis. To put into context these subthemes, in this Editorial, we summarize the main challenges being addressed nowadays in the field.
Phylogeny
Vertebrates exhibit varying degrees of adult neurogenesis. Along the phylogeny, there seems to be an apparent reduction in the extent and number of nervous system locations where it takes place (Kempermann, 2015; Terreros-Roncal et al., 2023). An exciting subfield of research on adult neurogenesis phylogeny is the analysis of whether it is evolutionarily conserved and a taxonomically widespread phenomenon, due to the relevance of characterizing de novo neurogenesis and regeneration. This aspect is addressed by González-Granero et al. in this Research Topic, conducting an ultrastructural characterization of the neural precursors present in the ventricular zone of a lizard. The authors show the identity and distribution of neural stem cells and their proliferative activity, neuroblast migration routes at the time of differentiation in the olfactory bulb, and neuronal maturation in the medial cortex of Podarcis liolepis. Given varying neurogenesis extent and duration, it's crucial to consider accumulated data on diverse regulatory mechanisms at cellular and molecular levels.
Cellular and molecular regulation of adult neurogenesis
Adult neurogenesis regulation has been extensively studied, providing comprehensive insights into neural stem cell quiescence, cell cycle entry, molecular mechanisms, and various aspects of newborn neuron life, such as self-renewal, differentiation, and survival (Llorens-Martín et al., 2009; Egeland et al., 2015; Kempermann et al., 2015; Urbá et al., 2019; Denoth-Lippuner and Jessberger, 2021). One of the most intriguing aspects of this regulation is how newborn neurons grow and extend their processes to get connected in an already established, mature circuit.
Cell differentiation and circuit integration have been largely described in the last decade and a half, accumulating very detailed descriptions about how it works, including synapse formation and functional integration (Toni and Schinder, 2016; Mira and Morante, 2020; Denoth-Lippuner and Jessberger, 2021; Ribeiro and Xapelli, 2021).
Function of adult neurogenesis
The role of adult neurogenesis was indirectly investigated for years through the analysis of the behavior of mice models after genetic, pharmacological, or interventional increases and decreases of newborn cell numbers, reviewed by Llorens-Martín et al. (2009). After the publication of the first mouse models genetically designed to address directly a lack or a substantial decrease of adult hippocampal neurogenesis, it was clear the direct involvement of adult neurogenesis in the behavior and specifically both in learning and memory and in specific mood traits (Abrous et al., 2005, 2022; Dupret et al., 2007; Cameron and Glover, 2015). This bulk evidence clearly reveals the relevance of investigating the physiology of these cells both in normal and disease conditions.
Normal/disease physiology
In the last three decades, an analysis of the physiology of adult neurogenesis in healthy and diseased organisms has accumulated a huge amount of information. Thanks to this evidence we know today that adult neurogenesis correlates (and in some cases, it has been directly related to the etiopathogenesis) with a number of brain conditions, including neurodegenerative diseases, depression, and fronto-temporal dementia, among others, reviewed by Toda et al. (2019), Berger et al. (2020), and Babcock et al. (2021). This aspect of adult neurogenesis has special relevance considering that it has been demonstrated to exist in humans and there are decreased newborn cell numbers and function associated to neurodegeneration-related cognitive decline (Moreno-Jiménez et al., 2021). In this subfield of investigation, Clavijo and Suárez-Martin studied for this Research Topic the rate of proliferation and morphology of neural stem cells, as the first step in the neurogenic process and due to the impact that any alteration can induce on the neurogenic phenomenon.
They analyzed three models of neuronal hyperexcitation: epilepsy induced by different doses of kainic acid, sub-seizure epileptiform activity, and a model of traumatic brain injury, and three models of neuroinflammation: LPS, Poly I:C, IFN-alpha. The authors report a very specific response of these systems, showing the fine-tuning of neural stem cells in response to different interventions. This topic has been widely discussed; see, for example, Encinas and Pineda, 2016.
The authors describe a direct involvement of astrocytes in the specific response, which depends on the type of intervention applied.
Their results reveal clear differences in the hyperexcitation vs. neuroinflammation processes on neural stem cells and, consequently, in adult neurogenesis.
New frontiers of analyses
Some new approaches have allowed very recent discoveries beyond the classical concepts of adult neurogenesis. In this Research Topic the authors address two fascinating issues: the presence of immature neurons in brain regions not usually described as having adult neurogenesis (cerebral cortex), and the use of novel experimental approaches to the study of neurogenesis, like organoids. Specifically, Coviello et al. analyze the distribution, fine structure, and neurochemical phenotype of the immature neurons in the adult human cerebral cortex, finding interesting results potentially useful for the investigation of some diseases such as epilepsy. The authors report a clear identification of immature cells as neurons, and a characterization of the features of these cells. They also discuss the gaps pending to investigate in this subpopulation of potential “reservoir” young plastic neurons.
In this line, Damianidou et al. review the advantages and limitations of the in vivo and in vitro models used to investigate the neurodevelopmental disorders and malformations of cortical development, starting from a description of the basic steps of brain development and evolutionary differences among mammals. After thorough descriptions and revision of the literature, they show a detailed picture of the pros and cons (that should include nevertheless ethical issues) of the new models to analyze a functional cerebral cortex in the laboratory, also addressing the limitations of brain organoids.
Author contributions
ÁF-L: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
The editors would like to thank the authors, the reviewers, the editors, and the editorial office for their support and time that enabled rapid handling and ensured the publishing of high-quality work.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abrous, D. N., Koehl, M., and Le Moal, M. (2005). Adult neurogenesis: from precursors to network and physiology. Physiol. Rev. 85, 523–569. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00055.2003
Abrous, N. D., Koehl, M., and Lemoine, M. (2022). A Baldwin interpretation of adult hippocampal neurogenesis: from functional relevance to physiopathology. Mol. Psychiatry 27, 383–402. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01172-4
Babcock, K. R., Page, J. S., Fallon, J. R., and Webb, A. E. (2021). Adult hippocampal neurogenesis in aging and Alzheimer's disease. Stem Cell Rep. 16, 681–693. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.01.019
Berger, T., Lee, H., Young, A. H., Aarsland, D., and Thuret, S. (2020). Adult hippocampal neurogenesis in major depressive disorder and Alzheimer's disease. Trends Mol. Med. 26, 803–818. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2020.03.010
Cameron, H. A., and Glover, L. R. (2015). Adult neurogenesis: beyond learning and memory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 66, 53–81. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015006
Denoth-Lippuner, A., and Jessberger, S. (2021). Formation and integration of new neurons in the adult hippocampus. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 22, 223–236. doi: 10.1038/S41583-021-00433-Z
Dupret, D., Fabre, A., Döbrössy, M. D., Panatier, A., Rodríguez, J. J., Lamarque, S., et al. (2007). Spatial learning depends on both the addition and removal of new hippocampal neurons. PLoS Biol. 5, e214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050214
Egeland, M., Zunszain, P. A., and Pariante, C. M. (2015). Molecular mechanisms in the regulation of adult neurogenesis during stress. Nat Rev Neurosci. 16, 189–200 doi: 10.1038/nrn3855
Encinas, J. M., and Pineda, J. R. (2016). The contradictory effects of neuronal hyperexcitation on adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Front. Neurosci. 10, 74. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00074
Kempermann, G. (2015). Adult neurogenesis: an evolutionary perspective. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8, a018986. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018986
Kempermann, G., Song, H., and Gage, F. H. (2015). Neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7, a018812. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018812
Llorens-Martín, M., Torres-Alemán, I., and Trejo, J. L. (2009). Mechanisms mediating brain plasticity: IGF1 and adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Neuroscientist 15, 134–148. doi: 10.1177/1073858408331371
Mira, H., and Morante, J. (2020). Neurogenesis from embryo to adult – lessons from flies and mice. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 533. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00533
Moreno-Jiménez, E. P., Terreros-Roncal, J., Flor-García, M., Rábano, A., and Llorens-Martín, M. (2021). Dual perspectives evidences for adult hippocampal neurogenesis in humans. J. Neurosci. 41, 2541–2553. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.0675-20.2020
Ribeiro, F. F., and Xapelli, S. (2021). Intervention of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and other neurotrophins in adult neurogenesis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1331, 95–115. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-74046-7_8
Terreros-Roncal, J., Flor-García, M., Moreno-Jiménez, E. P., Rodríguez-Moreno, C. B., Márquez-Valadez, B., Gallardo-Caballero, M., et al. (2023). Methods to study adult hippocampal neurogenesis in humans and across the phylogeny. Hippocampus 33, 271–306. doi: 10.1002/hipo.23474
Toda, T., Parylak, S. L., Linker, S. B., and Gage, F. H. (2019). The role of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in brain health and disease. Mol. Psychiatry 24, 67. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0036-2
Toni, N., and Schinder, A. F. (2016). Maturation and functional integration of new granule cells into the adult hippocampus. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8, a018903. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018903
Keywords: neurogenesis, adult neurogenesis, hippocampus, neural stem cell physiology, cell differentiation, circuit integration
Citation: Fontán-Lozano Á (2023) Editorial: Global excellence in neurogenesis: Europe. Front. Neurosci. 17:1335276. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1335276
Received: 08 November 2023; Accepted: 13 November 2023;
Published: 27 November 2023.
Edited and reviewed by: Luca Bonfanti, University of Turin, Italy
Copyright © 2023 Fontán-Lozano. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ángela Fontán-Lozano, YWZvbnRhbiYjeDAwMDQwO3VzLmVz