AUTHOR=Singh Neha , Saini Megha , Kumar Nand , Padma Srivastava M. V. , Mehndiratta Amit TITLE=Individualized closed-loop TMS synchronized with exoskeleton for modulation of cortical-excitability in patients with stroke: a proof-of-concept study JOURNAL=Frontiers in Neuroscience VOLUME=17 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1116273 DOI=10.3389/fnins.2023.1116273 ISSN=1662-453X ABSTRACT=Background

Repetitive TMS is used in stroke rehabilitation with predefined passive low and high-frequency stimulation. Brain State-Dependent Stimulation (BSDS)/Activity-Dependent Stimulation (ADS) using bio-signal has been observed to strengthen synaptic connections. Without the personalization of brain-stimulation protocols, we risk a one-size-fits-all approach.

Methods

We attempted to close the ADS loop via intrinsic-proprioceptive (via exoskeleton-movement) and extrinsic-visual-feedback to the brain. We developed a patient-specific brain stimulation platform with a two-way feedback system, to synchronize single-pulse TMS with exoskeleton along with adaptive performance visual feedback, in real-time, for a focused neurorehabilitation strategy to voluntarily engage the patient in the brain stimulation process.

Results

The novel TMS Synchronized Exoskeleton Feedback (TSEF) platform, controlled by the patient’s residual Electromyogram, simultaneously triggered exoskeleton movement and single-pulse TMS, once in 10 s, implying 0.1 Hz frequency. The TSEF platform was tested for a demonstration on three patients (n = 3) with different spasticity on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS = 1, 1+, 2) for one session each. Three patients completed their session in their own timing; patients with (more) spasticity tend to take (more) inter-trial intervals. A proof-of-concept study on two groups—TSEF-group and a physiotherapy control-group was performed for 45 min/day for 20-sessions. Dose-matched Physiotherapy was given to control-group. Post 20 sessions, an increase in ipsilesional cortical-excitability was observed; Motor Evoked Potential increased by ~48.5 μV at a decreased Resting Motor Threshold by ~15.6%, with improvement in clinical scales relevant to the Fugl-Mayer Wrist/Hand joint (involved in training) by 2.6 units, an effect not found in control-group. This strategy could voluntarily engage the patient.

Conclusion

A brain stimulation platform with a real-time two-way feedback system was developed to voluntarily engage the patients during the brain stimulation process and a proof-of-concept study on three patients indicates clinical gains with increased cortical excitability, an effect not observed in the control-group; and the encouraging results nudge for further investigations on a larger cohort.