AUTHOR=Xie Yu-lei , Yang Yu-xuan , Jiang Hong , Duan Xing-Yu , Gu Li-jing , Qing Wu , Zhang Bo , Wang Yin-xu 

TITLE=Brain-machine interface-based training for improving upper extremity function after stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Neuroscience

VOLUME=16

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2022.949575

DOI=10.3389/fnins.2022.949575

ISSN=1662-453X

ABSTRACT=<sec><title>Background</title><p>Upper extremity dysfunction after stroke is an urgent clinical problem that greatly affects patients' daily life and reduces their quality of life. As an emerging rehabilitation method, brain-machine interface (BMI)-based training can extract brain signals and provide feedback to form a closed-loop rehabilitation, which is currently being studied for functional restoration after stroke. However, there is no reliable medical evidence to support the effect of BMI-based training on upper extremity function after stroke. This review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BMI-based training for improving upper extremity function after stroke, as well as potential differences in efficacy of different external devices.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>English-language literature published before April 1, 2022, was searched in five electronic databases using search terms including “brain-computer/machine interface”, “stroke” and “upper extremity.” The identified articles were screened, data were extracted, and the methodological quality of the included trials was assessed. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software. The GRADE method was used to assess the quality of the evidence.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>A total of 17 studies with 410 post-stroke patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that BMI-based training significantly improved upper extremity motor function [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.34, 0.90); <italic>I</italic><sup>2</sup> = 38%; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001; <italic>n</italic> = 385; random-effects model; moderate-quality evidence]. Subgroup meta-analysis indicated that BMI-based training significantly improves upper extremity motor function in both chronic [SMD = 0.68; 95% CI (0.32, 1.03), <italic>I</italic><sup>2</sup> = 46%; <italic>p</italic> = 0.0002, random-effects model] and subacute [SMD = 1.11; 95%CI (0.22, 1.99); <italic>I</italic><sup>2</sup> = 76%; <italic>p</italic> = 0.01; random-effects model] stroke patients compared with control interventions, and using functional electrical stimulation (FES) [SMD = 1.11; 95% CI (0.67, 1.54); <italic>I</italic><sup>2</sup> = 11%; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.00001; random-effects model]or visual feedback [SMD = 0.66; 95% CI (0.2, 1.12); <italic>I</italic><sup>2</sup> = 4%; <italic>p</italic> = 0.005; random-effects model;] as the feedback devices in BMI training was more effective than using robot. In addition, BMI-based training was more effective in improving patients' activities of daily living (ADL) than control interventions [SMD = 1.12; 95% CI (0.65, 1.60); <italic>I</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0%; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.00001; <italic>n</italic> = 80; random-effects model]. There was no statistical difference in the dropout rate and adverse effects between the BMI-based training group and the control group.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>BMI-based training improved upper limb motor function and ADL in post-stroke patients. BMI combined with FES or visual feedback may be a better combination for functional recovery than robot. BMI-based trainings are well-tolerated and associated with mild adverse effects.</p></sec>