Erratum: Periodicity Pitch Perception

, Frontiers Production Office

doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00833

ERRATUM article

Front. Neurosci., 04 August 2020

Sec. Neuromorphic Engineering

Volume 14 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00833

This article is part of the Research Topic Neural Living Rooms, Volume II: Interval Tuned Microcircuits View all 3 articles

Erratum: Periodicity Pitch Perception

This article is an erratum on:

Periodicity Pitch Perception
1. Read original article

$\nFrontiers Production Office$ Frontiers Production Office^*

Frontiers Media SA, Lausanne, Switzerland

An Erratum on
Periodicity Pitch Perception

by Klefenz, F., and Harczos, T. (2020). Front. Neurosci. 14:486. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00486

Due to a production error, microseconds (μs) were erroneously changed to milliseconds (ms). A correction has been made to the Results, subsection First Spike Latency (FSL), paragraph three:

“First spike latencies are a linear function of the tone interval with the regression line given as y = 1.0126x + 42.327; R² = 0.9997. Interval durations and FSLs are nearly identical because of the slope 1.0126 of the regression line. This setting has a drastic impact and minimizes the mean standard deviation over C4 to C6 to 18.11 μs, which is an indicator for the high precision of the timers. From C4 until F5, except a single slight overlap {Db5, D5}, there is no overlap of the ±2 σ error bars so that tones are distinguishable with high fidelity at the 95% confidence level.”

Corrections have also been made to the Results, subsection Stochastic Term Modeling:

“The adapted Aubie's model responds with a mean FSL SD derived from all intervals of 18.11 μs. To circumvent the CPU's time-consuming interval duration computation in NEURON, for every ISI we replace Aubie's model by formulating an equivalent stochastic computation input/output function with a Poisson distribution of ±20 μs and apply it to the test corpora. We take audio snippets with a length of 100 consecutive octopus spike intervals for a selected patch. For each interval, we compute a mean F0 for each patch. The computation of the weight of a patch is the same as in our previous article (Harczos and Klefenz, 2018).”

The publisher apologizes for this mistake. The original article has been updated.

References

Harczos, T., and Klefenz, F. M. (2018). Modeling pitch perception with an active auditory model extended by octopus cells. Front. Neurosci. 12:660. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00660

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: periodicity pitch, temporal receptive fields, inter-spike interval tuned microcircuits, first spike latency, periodicity, auditory model

Citation: Frontiers Production Office (2020) Erratum: Periodicity Pitch Perception. Front. Neurosci. 14:833. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00833

Received: 15 July 2020; Accepted: 16 July 2020;
Published: 04 August 2020.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2020 Frontiers Production Office. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Frontiers Production Office, cHJvZHVjdGlvbi5vZmZpY2UmI3gwMDA0MDtmcm9udGllcnNpbi5vcmc=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.