ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Neurological Biomarkers

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1567767

Association of alkaline-phosphatase/albumin ratio with all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with ischemic stroke: A retrospective study

Provisionally accepted
Tao  ZhengTao Zheng1Mengmeng  GuoMengmeng Guo2Yating  HanYating Han3Guanglu  LiGuanglu Li1Xianhua  WangXianhua Wang1Shenjie  LiShenjie Li3Yuting  GaoYuting Gao3Wenxiong  TangWenxiong Tang4*Zunjing  LiuZunjing Liu3*
  • 1Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
  • 2Department of Neurology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 3Department of Neurology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
  • 4Department of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Recent studies have shown that alkaline phosphatase to albumin ratio (APAR) is a prognostic biomarker for coronary heart disease and cancer. However, the effect of APAR on the prognosis of ischemic stroke (IS) remains unclear. We aimed to assess the association of APAR with all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with IS.Methods: Critically ill patients with IS were identified from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) Version 3.0 database, and classified into quartiles based on APAR index levels. Clinical outcomes included all-cause mortality at 28-days, 90-days and 365-days after admission. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and restricted cubic spline method were used to clarify the relationship between APAR index and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with IS.Results: A total of 1,690 critically ill patients with IS were selected from the MIMIC-IV database.Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that increased APAR index was significantly associated with all-cause mortality. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, patients with higher APAR (Q4: 1.524-2.794) had significantly increased all-cause mortality at 28-days, 90-days, and 365-days after admission (HR 2.05, 95%CI 1.47-2.86, P = 0; HR 2.09, 95%CI 1.53-2.85, P = 0; HR 2.09, 95%CI 1.53-2.85, P = 0). APAR had a linear relationship with 28-days and 365-days mortality (P for non-linearity: 0.098 and 0.051), but a nonlinear relationship with 90-days mortality (P for non-linearity: 0.042). Subgroup analyses further revealed that higher APAR was also associated with increased long-term mortality in IS patients without hypertension, DM, cardiovascular disease, liver disease or CKD. In addition, we did not observe any interaction between subgroup variables and APAR.Conclusions: A higher APAR index was significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality at 28-days, 90-days and 365-days after admission for critically ill patients with IS. The APAR index may help identify patients with IS at high risk of all-cause death.

Keywords: albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, APAR, ischemic stroke, Mortality, biomarker

Received: 25 Feb 2025; Accepted: 01 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zheng, Guo, Han, Li, Wang, Li, Gao, Tang and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Wenxiong Tang, Department of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Zunjing Liu, Department of Neurology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, 100044, Beijing Municipality, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more