REVIEW article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Autonomic Disorders

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1567708

Impact of Exercise to Treat Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Provisionally accepted
  • 1The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
  • 2University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, United States
  • 3The Pennsylvania State University (PSU), University Park, Pennsylvania, United States
  • 4Jeffrey Boris, MD LLC, Moylan, United States
  • 5The University of the Pacific, Stockton, California, United States
  • 6Zaitoun Specialized Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
  • 7SSM Health Care, St Louis, Missouri, United States
  • 8Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States
  • 9Intermountain Health Care, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
  • 10Johns Hopkins Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • 11University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a chronic condition associated with a high symptom burden and decreased quality of life (QOL). Exercise is currently considered to be a first line non-pharmacological treatment for POTS. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the impact of exercise on cardiovascular and patient-centered outcomes in patients with POTS.Purpose: To evaluate whether exercise benefits patients with POTS by synthesizing data from published clinical studies. Methods: Electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane CENTRAL, and others were searched and results were exported on May 2, 2023. Study inclusion: those that utilized an exercise program as an intervention for POTS and were conducted as experimental or quasi-experimental design. Exclusions: Non-English language papers and opinion-based/theoretical/non-empirical studies/case reports. Data extraction was based on Cochrane Handbook guidance and summarized according to Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines; methodological quality and risk of bias was evaluated using the JBI Critical Appraisal tools. Standardized effects were calculated and summarized based on the direction of effect.Results: Seven studies included in the final review are described in the data summary and synthesis. Improvements in heart rate were reported across all studies reviewed, while stroke volume and QOL improvements were also found. Notably, not all studies reported on the latter two outcomes. Methodological variability across studies precluded meta-analysis, and risk of bias was considered moderate-high in all but a single study.BP: blood pressure CO: cardiac output EDS: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome FITT: frequency, intensity, time and type HR: heart rate IBS: irritable bowel syndrome ITT: intention-to-treat JBI: Joanna Briggs Institute LOCF: last observation carried forward MAP: mean arterial pressure MCAS: mast cell activation syndrome ME/CFS: myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome PEM: post-exertional malaise POTS: Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome PP: per-protocol QOL: quality of life SWiM: Synthesis Without Meta-analysis SV: stroke volume TPR: total peripheral resistance

Keywords: POTS, Exercise rehabilitation program, Autonomic, Systematic review, Synthesis

Received: 27 Jan 2025; Accepted: 05 Mar 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Cortez, Aikins, Arnold, Boris, Davenport, Johnson, Kattaya, Kinsella, McFarland, Pelo, Powers, Schiltz, Stiles, Ziaks, Chung and DalMolin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Melissa M Cortez, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more