Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1561810

Disparities in Patient Share and Characteristics Between Disease-Modifying Therapy-Treated and -Untreated People with Multiple Sclerosis in Germany: A Claims Data Analysis from 2017 to 2022

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Temedica GmbH, Munich, Germany
  • 2 Hexal AG, Holzkirchen, Germany
  • 3 Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
  • 4 Neurological Rehabilitation Center Quellenhof, Bad Wildbad, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Despite significant advances in multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment, a substantial proportion of people with MS (pwMS) remains untreated with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). This study aimed to assess the proportion of DMT-untreated pwMS according to clinical and sociodemographic characteristics, the differences in healthcare utilization patterns, including MRI frequency and physiotherapy use, between DMT-treated and DMT-untreated pwMS, as well as to examine the time to first prescription among newly diagnosed pwMS in Germany from 2017 to 2022. Longitudinal routine data from 4.5 million individuals insured by German statutory health insurance were analyzed. PwMS were identified by ICD-10-GM code G35 in at least two quarters within a calendar year. PwMS who filled a DMT prescription during the observation period were classified as DMT-treated. Newly diagnosed pwMS had no recorded G35 code and DMT prescription in the two years prior to initial MS coding. MRI scans and physiotherapy sessions were identified using OPS codes and the German Heilmittelkatalog. Group differences were tested with two-sided χ²-tests and t-tests. In total, 45.6% of pwMS were DMT-untreated. DMT-untreated rates were higher in secondary progressive (SPMS) and primary progressive MS (PPMS) than relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) (p<0.0001). Older pwMS (>45 years) were more frequently DMT-untreated (56.0%) compared to younger pwMS (≤45 years) (27.4%) (p<0.0001). Regional differences ranged from 37.5% in eastern Germany to 54.0% in the south-west. More than half of newly diagnosed pwMS did not receive their first prescription for DMT within six months of their initial MS coding, with longer times to first DMT prescription among pwMS with a progressive compared to a relapsing disease onset (p<0.0001). DMT-untreated pwMS averaged more physiotherapy sessions (DMT-untreated: 23.7, SD 35.0; DMT-treated: 20.2, SD 28.7; p<0.0001) and less MRI scans (DMT-untreated: 0.8, SD 0.8; DMT-treated: 1.5, SD 0.8; p<0.0001) annually over the observation period than DMT-treated pwMS. These real-world data offer valuable insights into patient care and treatment allocation.

    Keywords: Multiple Sclerosis, Real-world data, healthcare utilization, Disease modifying therapy-untreated, Regionality

    Received: 16 Jan 2025; Accepted: 31 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Stratil, Papukchieva, Neß, Wolf, Bayas, Flachenecker and Friedrich. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Benjamin Friedrich, Temedica GmbH, Munich, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more