
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neurotechnology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1561134
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study aims to investigate the impact of the offending vessel's compression location on intraoperative lateral spread response (LSR) waveform parameters during microvascular decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm (HFS).Additionally, the study evaluates the clinical significance of LSR variations in intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring.: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 72 patients with HFS who underwent MVD at Nanjing Brain Hospital between September 2021 and September 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the compression site of the offending vessel on the facial nerve: the Transitional Zone (TZ) group and the Attached Segment (AS) group. General clinical characteristics, intraoperative LSR parameters, and postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. Statistical analyses focused on LSR latency, amplitude, and duration, as well as the patterns of LSR disappearance and postoperative complications.The TZ group comprised 31 patients, while the AS group included 41. No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between groups.Intraoperative monitoring revealed that LSR disappearance was more frequently incomplete in the TZ group (11.1%) than in the AS group (p < 0.05). LSR latency was significantly longer in the AS group (p < 0.001), while the amplitude in the orbicularis oculi muscle was lower in the TZ group (p < 0.001). Additionally, LSR duration(T2) in the orbicularis oris (p < 0.05) and mentalis muscles (p < 0.01) was longer in the AS group, though the amplitude differences were not statistically significant.Postoperative outcomes showed no significant difference in effectiveness between the groups (AS: 92.7% vs. TZ: 93.5%, p=0.882). Complications, such as facial palsy and hoarseness, were slightly more common in the AS group, whereas hearing loss and ataxia were more frequent in the TZ group. However, none of these differences reached statistical significance.The compression location of the offending vessel significantly influences LSR parameters, with longer latency and prolonged duration observed in the AS group. Despite these variations, postoperative outcomes and complications 3 were comparable between groups. These findings highlight the importance of considering the compression location during MVD and the potential value of LSR monitoring in guiding surgical decision-making.
Keywords: Hemifacial Spasm, Microvascular decompression, Electrophysiological monitoring, Lateral spread response, Abnormal muscle response
Received: 15 Jan 2025; Accepted: 12 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ding, Li, Zuo, Xiao, Wang, Liu and Zou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yong Liu, Nanjing Brain Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Yuanjie Zou, Nanjing Brain Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.