
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Sleep Disorders
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1560518
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Sleep is critical to the health, wellbeing and performance of recruits during Army basic training, however, is often sacrificed due to the constraints of basic training schedules. In an effort to improve sleep duration of recruits, the revised Common Military Syllabus 21 (CMS21) restricted daily scheduled military training from 1830, thus enabling greater opportunity for earlier bedtimes and longer nocturnal sleep periods. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of the revised CMS21 basic training programme on measures of sleep-wake indices and compare against the previous programme (CMS18) as a control group. Several actigraphy-derived and self-reported sleep-wake indices assessed potential changes in sleep opportunity between groups (CMS21 vs CMS18) and across 12-weeks of basic training. Actigraphy was measured daily to deduce weekly averages and self-report measures (i.e., sleep diaries) were captured during weeks 1, 6 and 11 of basic training. Sleep-wake data are presented descriptively (mean±SD) and a series of linear-mixed models determined differences in actigraphy between groups and across each week. Compared to CMS18, no significant improvements in any sleep-wake indices were observed during CMS21. The average sleep duration for both groups remained below the minimum national sleep duration recommendations for young adults (deficit of ~1h20m), with 67% to 94% of recruits in CMS18 and 69% to 97% of recruits in CMS21 achieving an average of <7hrs sleep per night, respectively. Similar proportions of recruits reported poor-levels of sleep quality (≤ 60%) during CMS18 and CMS21, with excessive noise and early-morning wake times identified as the most common sleep disturbances. The contracted early-morning feeding times and the magnitude of non-scheduled late-evening military admin were determined as key factors preventing adequate sleep opportunity despite restricting scheduled military training from 1830 during CMS21. The results of this study warrant the application of improved sleep hygiene practices within the basic training environment. It is also recommended that the contracted early-morning feeding times and magnitude of non-scheduled training activity be considered as factors for change within future programme design to optimise sleep opportunity during basic training.
Keywords: Recruits, Basic training, sleep duration, sleep quality, military
Received: 14 Jan 2025; Accepted: 11 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Rawcliffe, Moxham, Britt, Hinde, Chapman and Roberts. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Alex Rawcliffe, Army Recruit Health and Performance Research, Medical Branch, HQ Army Recruiting and Initial Training Command, Ministry of Defence, Upavon, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.