Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Epilepsy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1560077

This article is part of the Research Topic Innovative Models for Community Health: Integrative Approaches to Public Health and Wellness View all articles

A Qualitative Analysis of Clinician Perspectives on Community Health Worker Integration at Epilepsy Centers

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, United States
  • 2 The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
  • 3 Department of Neurology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
  • 4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  • 5 University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Substantial evidence supports community health worker (CHW) interventions lead to improved health outcomes, but health professionals' perceptions of CHW roles and effectiveness may slow integration into care delivery systems. Research on CHWs as members of specialty care teams in clinical settings, especially in the epilepsy field, is limited.We conducted semi-structured interviews between April and October 2022 to explore perceptions of multidisciplinary clinicians (n = 12; physicians, nurses, social workers) based at five New England epilepsy centers about the potential for successful CHW integration on specialist epilepsy center care teams. Transcripts were analyzed using a mixed inductive and deductive thematic approach.: Themes that emerged included: (1) limited epilepsy clinician awareness of the CHW role and minimal experience working with a CHW; (2) limited clinician knowledge of how to recruit CHWs; (3) preference for CHW roles and responsibilities in epilepsy centers being focused on social determinants of health (4) clinician uncertainty around scope of CHW training and supervision; (5) unknown funding mechanisms for CHW integration in epilepsy centers; (6) knowledge of care gaps in addressing social determinants of health needs by epilepsy centers; (7) openness by epilepsy center care team members to CHW integration, and (8) environment and collaborative culture at epilepsy centers. Discussion: Despite limited knowledge and experience regarding CHW roles and mechanisms for recruiting and sustaining CHW positions, the multidisciplinary clinicians interviewed valued the potential benefits of CHWs in an epilepsy center and endorsed a need to better address patients' unmet social determinants of health needs.

    Keywords: Epilepsy, social determinants of health, Community Health Workers, health equity, care coordination, interdisciplinary teams Frontiers | Author guidelines

    Received: 13 Jan 2025; Accepted: 14 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Kiriakopoulos, Jobst, Kobau, Murray, Sykes, Lenz, Dawson, Kaden and Chu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Elaine Kiriakopoulos, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more