Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neurotrauma
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1556427

Brain glucose metabolism in patients with traumatic brain injury undergoing rehabilitation: a longitudinal 18F-FDG PET study

Provisionally accepted
Valeria Pingue Valeria Pingue 1,2*Irene Bossert Irene Bossert 1Daniela D'Ambrosio Daniela D'Ambrosio 1Antonio Nardone Antonio Nardone 1,2Giuseppe Trifirò Giuseppe Trifirò 1Nicola Canessa Nicola Canessa 3Diego Franciotta Diego Franciotta 4
  • 1 Scientific Clinical Institute Maugeri (ICS Maugeri), Pavia, Italy
  • 2 University of Pavia, Pavia, Lombardy, Italy
  • 3 University School for Advanced Studies, University Institute of Higher Studies in Pavia, Pavia, Lombardy, Italy
  • 4 Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background Measuring 18F-FDG PET-detected brain glucose uptake provides reliable information on metabolic tissue abnormalities, cells dysfunction, and neurovascular changes after traumatic brain injury (TBI).We aimed to study the relationship between post-traumatic brain glucose metabolism and functional outcomes in the so far unexplored field of longitudinally 18F-FDG PET-monitored patients undergoing rehabilitation after moderate-to-severe TBI.Methods Fourteen patients consecutively admitted to our unit in the post-acute phase after TBI underwent 18F-FDG-PET scans performed before and 6 months after inpatient rehabilitation program. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) for neurological status, and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) plus the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) scales for the rehabilitation outcome, were applied on admission and discharge. Voxel-wise analyses were performed, with the Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM12) software, to investigate pre-vs post-rehabilitation changes of brain metabolism, and their relationships with clinical indices.In the whole sample, 18F-FDG uptake significantly increased in the following five regions that were hypometabolic before rehabilitation: inferior frontal gyrus bilaterally, alongside right precentral gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, and cerebellum. However, only for the right precentral gyrus the median voxel peak-value at baseline resulted a significant predictor of both cognitive (FIM cognitive subscale, p=0.012), and functional (GOS-E, p=0.02; post-vs pre-treatment GOS-E difference, p=0.009) improvements. ROC curve analysis showed that a peak voxel-value of 1.7998 was the optimal cut-off for favourable rehabilitation outcome. Unfavourable functional outcomes were predicted by increased 18F-FDG uptake in the inferior frontal gyrus (GOS-E, p=0.032) and precentral gyrus (FIM cognitive subscale, p=0.017; GOS-E, p=0.015).Conclusions This proof-of-principle study enlightens the metabolic changes occurring in moderateto-severe TBI course. Notably, such changes preferentially involve definite frontal brain areas regardless of TBI localization and entity. These findings pave the way for further studies with translational purposes.

    Keywords: Traumatic Brain Injury, Rehabilitation, PET Scanning, neuroplasticity, voxel-wiseanalyses

    Received: 06 Jan 2025; Accepted: 07 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Pingue, Bossert, D'Ambrosio, Nardone, Trifirò, Canessa and Franciotta. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Valeria Pingue, Scientific Clinical Institute Maugeri (ICS Maugeri), Pavia, Italy

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.