Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Neurotechnology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1556026

Clinical efficacy of surgery for patients with Chiari malformation type Ⅰ with syringomyelia: Posterior fossa decompression versus Posterior fossa decompression with resection of tonsils

Provisionally accepted
Peizhi Ji Peizhi Ji 1*Lei Zhang Lei Zhang 1Ben Li Ben Li 2Shuo Wei Shuo Wei 1Hong Wei Hu Hong Wei Hu 1Hongfu Chen Hongfu Chen 1YueChao Fan YueChao Fan 1Hui Zhang Hui Zhang 1
  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
  • 2 Department of Neurobiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: The optimal surgical approach for treating Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) with syringomyelia remains a topic of debate. Key areas of controversy include the extent of decompressive craniectomy, the necessity of subarachnoid exploration, and whether to excise the herniated tonsils. In this study, we present our perspectives on these contentious issues through a retrospective analysis of the clinical efficacy of posterior fossa decompression with resection of tonsils (PFDRT) compared to posterior fossa decompression (PFD).Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 162 patients diagnosed with CM-I and syringomyelia who underwent surgical intervention at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between January 2017 and December 2022. Among these, 58 patients underwent PFD, while 104 received PFDRT. The efficacy of the treatments was evaluated using the Chicago Chiari Deformity Prognosis Scale (CCOS) at six months post-surgery, with scores ranging from 13 to 16 indicating a favorable prognosis. Furthermore, the improvement of syringomyelia was assessed through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the six-month follow-up.Results: Six months post-surgery, according to the Chiari Clinical Outcome Scale (CCOS) score, the improved rates for the PFD and PFDRT groups were 56.9% and 78.8%, respectively. Additionally, the recovery rates for syringomyelia in these groups were 55.2% and 76%, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed in both the rates of favorable prognosis and syringomyelic improvement between the two groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications, including fever, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, intracranial infection, and incision infection, did not differ significantly between the groups (P > 0.05).Conclusions: Our findings indicate that PFDRT yields superior outcomes in syringomyelia improvement and favorable prognoses compared to PFD, while maintaining comparable postoperative complication rates.

    Keywords: Chiari malformation type I, Posterior fossa decompression, Posterior fossa decompression with resection of tonsils, Syringomyelia, cerebellar tonsils

    Received: 06 Jan 2025; Accepted: 11 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Ji, Zhang, Li, Wei, Hu, Chen, Fan and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Peizhi Ji, Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more