ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Artificial Intelligence in Neurology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1549195

This article is part of the Research TopicTechnology Developments and Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neurodegenerative DiseasesView all 3 articles

Longitudinal Alterations in Morphological Brain Networks and Cognitive Function in Common-Type COVID-19: A 3-Month Follow-Up Study

Provisionally accepted
Ying  LiuYing Liu1,2Bei  PengBei Peng2Haixia  QinHaixia Qin2Kaixuan  ZhouKaixuan Zhou2Shihuan  LinShihuan Lin2Yinqi  LaiYinqi Lai2Lingyan  LiangLingyan Liang2Gaoxiong  DuanGaoxiong Duan2Xiaocheng  LiXiaocheng Li2Xiaoyan  ZhouXiaoyan Zhou2Yi Chen  WeiYi Chen Wei2Qingping  ZhangQingping Zhang2Jinli  HuangJinli Huang2Yan  ZhangYan Zhang2Jiazhu  HuangJiazhu Huang2Ruijing  SunRuijing Sun2Sijing  TuoSijing Tuo2Yuxin  ChenYuxin Chen2*Demao  DengDemao Deng2*
  • 1Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
  • 2Department of Radiology, The People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanning, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Purpose: To investigate the morphological network and cognitive function of patients with common-type coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the acute phase, and examine dynamic changes at 3-month follow-up. Methods: At baseline, high-resolution T1-weighted imaging was conducted in 35 patients with COVID-19 and 40 healthy controls; 22 patients were reassessed at 3 months. All patients underwent cognitive assessments. Individual morphological brain networks were constructed using grey matter volume similarity, and topological properties were analyzed using graph theory. We used an independent sample t-test at baseline and a paired sample t-test to compare the 3-month follow-up with the acute phase, with false discovery rate corrections (p < 0.05). Results: In the acute phase, patients exhibited increased subcortical network (SCN) connectivity, and reduced connectivity between the frontoparietal network (FPN) and limbic network (LN), the SCN and dorsal/ventral attention network (DAN/VAN), and the LN and DAN. At follow-up, SCN connectivity remained elevated, with partial recovery in SCN-DAN/VAN and LN-DAN connectivity, and significant FPN-LN improvements. Enhanced global efficiency and reduced path length indicated improved network integration. Additionally, digit symbol substitution test and verbal fluency test scores improved over time. Conclusion: COVID-19 induces short-term disruptions in cognition-related morphological subnetworks, with subcortical networks compensating for these changes. Significant recovery in FPN-LN connectivity and partial restoration of other networks highlight the plasticity of the brain and suggest that FPN-LN connectivity is a potential neuroimaging marker for cognitive recovery.

Keywords: graph theory, morphological brain network, COVID-19, Cognitive Function, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Received: 20 Dec 2024; Accepted: 27 Mar 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Peng, Qin, Zhou, Lin, Lai, Liang, Duan, Li, Zhou, Wei, Zhang, Huang, Zhang, Huang, Sun, Tuo, Chen and Deng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yuxin Chen, Department of Radiology, The People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanning, China
Demao Deng, Department of Radiology, The People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanning, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more