SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Sleep Disorders

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1541276

This article is part of the Research TopicChronic insomnia: Treatment and managementView all 17 articles

Acupuncture for chronic insomnia disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Provisionally accepted
Yi  YuYi YuXinju  LiXinju LiZheng  ZhuZheng ZhuYingdong  WangYingdong WangQiang  XiQiang XiQiu  JiwenQiu JiwenYidan  XuYidan XuRuonan  LiangRuonan LiangYi  GuoYi Guo*Zhang  MingxingZhang Mingxing*
  • Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To investigate the effect of placebo response to acupuncture on subjective and objective sleep indices in patients with chronic insomnia disorder and to understand the effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of CID. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted from the inception of the databases to March 17, 2025, encompassing eight databases. A randomized controlled pilot study of collecting acupuncture versus sham acupuncture for the treatment of CID. Systematic collection of acupuncture therapies for CID was performed based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Independent researchers critically reviewed the literature, recorded relevant data, and assessed the quality of research. Data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3, Stata 17.0, and TSA 0.9.5.10.The study included a total of 757 patients across 10 trials. Acupuncture demonstrated significant improvement in PSQI scores (MD = -2.60, 95% CI = [-3.24, -1.97], P < 0.00001) and ISI scores (MD = -2.04, 95% CI = [-3.18, -0.90], P = 0.0005) compared to sham acupuncture. Sequential analyses of the trials showed stable results. Subgroup analyses showed that manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture were superior to sham acupuncture in improving PSQI scores (MD = -3.85, 95% CI = [-4.94, -2.76], P < 0.00001; MD = -1.67, 95% CI = [-2.25, -1.08], P < 0.00001). Manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture were superior to sham acupuncture in improving ISI scores (MD = -2.60, 95% CI = [-4.72, -0.48], P = 0.02; MD = -2.04, 95% CI = [-3.18, -0.90], P < 0.00001). In terms of objective sleep indices, there was no statistically significant difference in total sleep time between acupuncture and sham acupuncture (MD = 11.92, 95% CI = [-20.25, 44.09], P = 0.47). Acupuncture was superior to sham acupuncture in terms of sleep efficiency and wake after sleep onset. However, the sequential analysis indicated limitations due to small sample size which hindered drawing definitive conclusions.Compared with sham acupuncture, acupuncture is effective in improving subjective sleep quality in patients with CID. However, whether acupuncture improves patients' objective sleep indices compared to sham acupuncture is uncertain and more high-quality clinical trial evidence is needed to validate this.

Keywords: Acupuncture, chronic insomnia disorder, Systematic review, Meta-analysis, Trial sequential analysis

Received: 07 Dec 2024; Accepted: 17 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yu, Li, Zhu, Wang, Xi, Jiwen, Xu, Liang, Guo and Mingxing. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yi Guo, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
Zhang Mingxing, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more