Skip to main content

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Neurotrauma

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1524004

This article is part of the Research Topic Neurological and Neuropsychiatric Disorders Affecting Military Personnel and Veterans - Volume II View all 3 articles

The safety and feasibility of a pilot randomized clinical trial using combined exercise and neurostimulation for post-stroke pain: the EXERT-Stroke study

Provisionally accepted
Chen Lin Chen Lin 1,2*Charity J Morgan Charity J Morgan 1E Lane Schlitz Fortenberry E Lane Schlitz Fortenberry 1,2X. Michelle ANDROULAKIS X. Michelle ANDROULAKIS 3Keith McGregor Keith McGregor 1,2
  • 1 University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
  • 2 Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
  • 3 Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Charleston, South Carolina, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Chronic pain after stroke can occur between 10-50% of stroke survivors. Post-stroke pain (PSP) can lead to further complications in a stroke survivor's recovery. PSP is caused by the stroke itself and produces moderate or severe pain. It can manifest as new onset or worsening of prior headaches.EXERT-Stroke was a feasibility pilot 2-arm randomized sham-controlled, double-blind trial at a single center over a 30-day intervention period, followed by a month follow-up. Patients were recruited for this study from July 2022 through June 2024 at the Veterans Hospital. The study protocol was approved by the local institutional review board. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04672044). All potential participants were screened for safety with a graded exercise stress test before randomization. Participants were randomized (1:1) to either active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or sham rTMS. Both arms received the same exercise protocol. The intervention protocol consisted of 10 sessions over a 30-day period of rTMS (sham vs active) + exercise, where rTMS was delivered prior to each exercise session on the same day. RTMS was aimed at the M1 of the contra-lesional hemisphere. Exercise was delivered on a recumbent bicycle targeting a participant's heart rate reserve. Primary outcomes were intervention feasibility (attendance and tolerance) and safety (adverse events).Of those consented, one participant was a screen failure, and nine participants were randomized. The average age was 62 years old, 22.2% were female, and 44.4% were Black. For feasibility, five (55.5%) participants were randomized to active rTMS and four (44.4%) were randomized to sham rTMS. Four of the five (80%) active rTMS and two of the four (50.0%) of the sham rTMS completed the final assessment, suggesting that there was no association between treatment assignment and likelihood of completing the study. Importantly, there were no serious adverse events.This is the first feasibility trial to investigate paired intervention of exercise and rTMS in patients with post-stroke pain. The trial found that the intervention had few safety issues. There was overall positive feedback from participants.

    Keywords: Stroke, Post-stroke pain, post-stroke headaches, Clinical Trial, Neuromodulation, exercise Stroke, Exercise

    Received: 06 Nov 2024; Accepted: 02 Apr 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Lin, Morgan, Fortenberry, ANDROULAKIS and McGregor. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Chen Lin, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more