Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Headache and Neurogenic Pain

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1517279

This article is part of the Research Topic Innovative Approaches to Neuralgia: Mechanisms and Treatment Development View all 8 articles

Risk Factors and Clinical Significance of Refractory Pain in Patients with Bone Metastases: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

Provisionally accepted
Qiju Li Qiju Li 1Qingqing Liu Qingqing Liu 1Liu Yang Liu Yang 1Qin Li Qin Li 2Aimin Zhang Aimin Zhang 2*
  • 1 Chengdu Xinhua HospitalAffiliated to North Sichuan Medical College, Chengdu, China
  • 2 Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Refractory cancer pain, especially bone pain, presents a major clinical challenge that is difficult to manage despite the use of multimodal analgesic strategies. This meta-analysis aims to estimate the prevalence of refractory cancer pain in this patient population and to identify potential predictors that may increase the likelihood of developing such pain.In addition, we performed a systematic review of previous studies that delve into more effective pain strategies.Methods: This meta-analysis and systematic review were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed using PubMed,Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on risk factors for refractory metastatic bone pain. The inclusion criteria focused on studies reporting the incidence and/or risk factors associated with refractory cancer pain, providing relevant statistical measures such as odds ratios (OR), hazard ratios (HR), or relative risks (RR). The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using the R programming language.Results: The present study included eight studies with a cumulative sample size of 2,774 patients. The aggregated incidence of refractory cancer pain was found to be 70% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42% to 88%) using a random-effects model, highlighting a significant prevalence of pain that remains unresponsive to treatment. Notably, the heterogeneity among the included studies was considerable (I² = 98%, τ² = 2.7198). The analysis also identified several critical predictors of refractory cancer pain. The presence of multiple bone metastases was consistently linked to an increased likelihood of refractory cancer pain with an OR of 3.94 (95% CI: 2.64-5.87). Similarly, lytic bone metastases demonstrated a high OR of 5.99 (95% CI: 3.17-11.30). Furthermore, there was a strong correlation between the occurrence of refractory cancer pain with severe acute pain (OR = 219.20, 95% CI: 0.26-188127.63), breakthrough pain (OR = 16.44, 95% CI: 0.60-448.07), and psychological comorbidities such as depression (OR = 3.91,

    Keywords: Refractory cancer pain, Bone Metastases, Risk factors, Meta-analysis, Incidence, Pain Management

    Received: 25 Oct 2024; Accepted: 28 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Li, Liu, Yang, Li and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Aimin Zhang, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more