Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.
Sec. Pediatric Neurology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1502451

Selective dorsal rhizotomy long-term effects on functional motility in Jordanian children with spastic cerebral palsy

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States
  • 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Al Bashir Hospital, Amman, Jordan
  • 3 Al Bashir Hospital, Amman, Amman, Jordan
  • 4 Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Irbid, Jordan
  • 5 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Spasticity management in children with cerebral palsy (CP) is a challenge for healthcare providers worldwide. In the US and Europe, treatment options include non-surgical and surgical (i.e., selective dorsal rhizotomy, SDR) procedures, with beneficial effects on functional motility. SDR was introduced in Jordan in 2019. We performed the first assessment of the long-term effects on motor function in Jordanian children with spastic CP (SCP) who underwent SDR.Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 43 patients (28 boys, 15 girls; mean±SD age at surgery, 6.2±2.5 years; 67.4% with diplegia, 30.2% quadriplegia, and 2.3% hemiplegia; 97.7% bilateral deficits) who received SDR (42 bilateral) between 01/01/2019 and 03/01/2023 was conducted. Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) and Functional Mobility Scale (FMS) were compared before and 12 months after SDR. Sex, age at surgery, baseline severity, and post-SDR surgical treatment were included in the model (IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0).Clinical scores improved 12 months after SDR: GMFCS decreased (in 58.5% of patients), and FMS significantly increased (p<0.001); GMFCS decreased in 77.7% of those with pre-SDR severe impairment vs. 43.5% in moderately to mildly impaired patients. An age sub-analysis demonstrated higher changes in GMFCS in younger children (GMFCS decreased in 46.9% of those aged < 10 years old vs. none in those older than 10 years). These findings suggest that younger children (< 10 years old) and more impaired (levels IV and V on GMFCS) are likely the best candidates for this procedure. Twelve-month functional improvement was similar in boys and girls (GMFCS decreased by at least one level in 44.0% of boys vs. 37.5% of girls). Compared to pre-SDR management, all patients continued physiotherapy, less received Botox (by 97.7%), and more received adjunct orthopedic surgeries (32.6% vs. none) after SDR; out of those receiving post-SDR adjuvant surgeries, 50.0% improved GMFCS (compared to 64.0% of those without).Our data demonstrated SDR's beneficial long-term effects on functional mobility in SCP children, particularly those younger than ten years and more severely impaired. These findings provide critical information that may aid in identifying "the best" therapeutic window and "the best" candidate for SDR in Jordan.

    Keywords: Spastic cerebral palsy1, Selective dorsal rhizotomy2, Jordan3, Functional mobility4, Children5

    Received: 26 Sep 2024; Accepted: 13 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Al-kharabsheh, Hmade, Ismaiel, Khawaja, Altaher, Bani-Ahmed and Cirstea. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Carmen M Cirstea, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65212, Missouri, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.