The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Autonomic Disorders
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1515486
This article is part of the Research Topic An Update on Neurological Disorders Post COVID-19 Infection Vol 2: cardiovascular effects, neuro-cardiac and neuro-respiratory autonomic dysfunctions View all 9 articles
Oral medications for the treatment of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome; a systematic review of studies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
Provisionally accepted- 1 Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, United States
- 2 Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine (HJF), Bethesda, Maryland, United States
- 3 Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Illinois, United States
Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) is a complex form of dysautonomia that presents with abnormal autonomic reflexes upon standing, leading to symptoms such as lightheadedness, tachycardia, fatigue and cognitive impairment The COVID-19 pandemic has brought renewed attention to POTS due to its overlap with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC). Studies have found that a substantial percentage of COVID-19 survivors exhibit symptoms resembling POTS, elevating POTS diagnoses to previously unseen levels. We systematically reviewed the literature for existing high-quality evidence on potential interventions.A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies of oral medications for the management of POTS. We searched for published manuscripts on the medical management of POTS through 6 April 2024 which met prespecified inclusion criteria.We conducted quality appraisal and assessed risk of bias before extracting the data and performing synthesis to determine the current state of the evidence; particularly in the context of PASC.The study search and selection process identified 32 studies that met inclusion criteria, comprising randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews. Most included studies were judged to be of moderate to high quality, with largely low risk of bias. The most frequently studied medications were beta-blockers, ivabradine, and midodrine. Ivabradine and midodrine demonstrated the highest rate of symptomatic improvement, while beta-blockers showed the largest reduction in heart rate variability. Limited evidence was available for PASCassociated POTS, but findings suggest that treatments may have similar efficacy in both PASC and non-PASC cases.Ivabradine, midodrine, and beta-blockers currently appear to be reasonable front-line choices in pharmacologic management of POTS (PASC associated and otherwise). Further RCTs that evaluate long term outcomes of medications are needed to further establish evidence based pharmacologic treatment approaches for POTS. Particular areas of inquiry include differential efficacy of recommended therapies based on POTS subtypes, and a need for treatments directly targeting the underlying autonomic nervous system dysfunction.
Keywords: Long Covid, PASC, POTS, dysautonomia, Treatment, Oral medications
Received: 23 Oct 2024; Accepted: 17 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Pierson, Apilado, Franzos, Allard, Mancuso, Saunders, Tribble and Koehlmoos. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Benjamin Pierson, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.