Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 08 January 2025
Sec. Neurocritical and Neurohospitalist Care

Changes in hematoma volume following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and its impact on patient prognosis

Zhenshan HuangZhenshan Huang1Feng QianFeng Qian1Kui MaKui Ma1Guowei JiangGuowei Jiang1Lianfu ZhangLianfu Zhang1Yongming Zhang,
Yongming Zhang1,2*
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Anhui No. 2 Provincial People’s Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, China
  • 2Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China

Objective: This study aims to investigate the effects of preoperative intracerebral hematoma volume (HVpre), hematoma volume 6–8 days post-surgery (HVpost), and the rate of hematoma volume change (HVpre−HVpost)/HVpre on the prognosis of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).

Materials and methods: CT imaging data from 62 aSAH patients admitted to our hospital’s Neurosurgery Department between January 2022 and December 2023 were obtained, both preoperatively and 6–8 days postoperatively. The hematoma volumes were measured using 3D-Slicer. Patients’ recovery at 3 months post-discharge was assessed using the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), categorizing the patients into a good prognosis group (mRS score 1–2) and a poor prognosis group (mRS score 3–5). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors for poor prognosis. Statistical methods were employed to compare preoperative and postoperative hematoma volumes with commonly used clinical scores. The predictive value of HVpre and HVpost for poor prognosis was evaluated using ROC curves. The rate of volume change was stratified by interquartile ranges, and the impact of different change rates on prognosis was compared.

Results: Significant differences were found between good and poor prognosis groups in age, GCS score, Hunt-Hess grade, mFisher grade, BVpre, BVpost, and (HVpre−HVpost)/HVpre (p < 0.05). Logistic regression identified gender, age, BVpre, BVpost, and volume change rate as independent risk factors (p < 0.01). Increased GCS scores and higher Hunt-Hess and mFisher grades correlated with increased HVpre and HVpost. Higher hemorrhage reduction rates were linked to better outcomes. ROC curves showed HVpre and HVpost AUC values (0.831 and 0.857, respectively) were significantly higher than clinical scales. An HVpre volume over 22.25 mL and HVpost over 15.67 mL indicated a higher risk of poor prognosis, with sensitivities of 79.3 and 80.7%, and specificities of 67.1 and 69.3%.

Conclusion: HVpre, HVpost, and (HVpre−HVpost)/HVpre can serve as neuroimaging biomarkers for assessing patients after aSAH and can effectively predict clinical prognosis.

Introduction

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a severe neurological condition primarily caused by the rupture of intracranial aneurysms. Research indicates that 9 out of every 100,000 people in the United States, and nearly 600,000 people worldwide each year, experience this condition (1). Despite advances in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques that have reduced mortality rates, most survivors still suffer from mental health issues, cognitive impairments, and permanent disabilities, significantly diminishing their quality of life. Furthermore, about half of the aneurysm ruptures occur in individuals younger than 55, leading to productivity losses and substantial social costs in this age group (2).

Endovascular treatment is commonly used for aSAH, but it does not reduce the volume of hemorrhage that has already occurred. Blood leaking into the subarachnoid space, ventricles, or brain parenchyma can lead to a range of local and systemic symptoms, including hydrocephalus, delayed cerebral infarction, and cerebral vasospasm. These symptoms often result in secondary brain injuries, severely impacting patient prognosis (35). Currently, the Fisher scale or modified Fisher scale (mFS) is typically used to qualitatively assess the hematoma volume in aSAH. However, the mFS is susceptible to evaluator bias, and even with semi-quantitative methods, accurate quantification of hemorrhage is challenging (6). Therefore, an objective and precise measurement of hematoma volume in the subarachnoid space, brain parenchyma, and ventricles following intracranial aneurysm rupture, coupled with the establishment of a quantitative assessment system for aSAH hematoma volume, could potentially improve the accuracy of prognosis predictions for patients.

3D-Slicer is a free, open-source software designed for medical image processing, analysis, and visualization, and it can be used to accurately measure the volume of irregular intracranial hematomas (7). Utilizing 3D-Slicer to quantitatively measure hematoma volumes in the subarachnoid space and ventricles after aSAH holds significant potential for establishing a quantitative evaluation system to predict patient prognosis. Additionally, given that few studies have explored the impact of blood volume changes approximately 1 week after aSAH on prognosis, this study retrospectively collected CT imaging data from aSAH patients at admission and 6–8 days post-surgery. The hematoma volumes at both time points were measured using 3D-Slicer, and statistical methods were used to analyze their clinical value in predicting prognosis, with commonly used clinical scales serving as a comparison. The details of the study are reported as follows.

Materials and methods

Patients

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of aSAH patients admitted to the Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit of Anhui No. 2 Provincial People’s Hospital between January 2022 and December 2023. The flow chart is shown in Figure 1. All included patients were diagnosed with aSAH through cranial CT, CTA, and/or DSA and underwent early interventional surgery within 48 h of onset, followed by a cranial CT scan 6–8 days postoperatively. The exclusion criteria were: ① Patients with SAH caused by arteriovenous malformation rupture, trauma, or moyamoya disease; ② Patients with a history of stroke, intracranial tumors, or intracranial infections leading to neurological deficits; ③ Patients with coagulation disorders such as thrombocytopenia or hepatitis; ④ Patients with severe heart, liver, kidney, or lung diseases or organ failure; ⑤ Patients with Hunt-Hess grade V or postoperative rebleeding. This study was approved by the hospital’s Ethics Review Committee.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Flow chart.

Intravascular interventional embolism

The patient was placed in a supine position, and after successful induction of general anesthesia, routine disinfection and draping were performed. The right femoral artery was selected as the puncture site, and an 8F arterial sheath was inserted. With the support of a 6F guiding catheter, a contrast catheter was advanced to the internal carotid or vertebral artery. After heparinization, 3D angiography was performed to clearly delineate the aneurysm’s morphological features, including its shape, location, size, and the condition of the parent artery. Once the guiding catheter was positioned, the contrast catheter was withdrawn, and the microcatheter was shaped. Under the guidance of a microwire, the microcatheter was navigated into the aneurysm cavity. Based on the aneurysm’s size, an appropriate coil was selected and gradually packed into the aneurysm cavity through the microcatheter until dense packing was achieved. If necessary, stent assistance was employed to complete the endovascular embolization treatment. After surgery, all patients were admitted to the ICU for postoperative care and monitoring.

The calculation of SAH volume

First, the volumes module is used to adjust the window width and window level, aiming to enhance the resolution between the hematoma and the surrounding tissues. Next, the Threshold method in the SegmentEditor module is employed to define the intensity range of the hematoma. The hematoma threshold is generally measured between 50 and 70 Hounsfield Units (HU), contingent upon the type of brain parenchyma (8, 9). Subsequently, the Paint and Erase functions are utilized to reconstruct the hematoma model. The Segmentations module is then used to convert the model into a 3D representation, and the hematoma volume is automatically calculated within the Models module (Figure 2). The rate of change in intracerebral hematoma volume [(HVpre-HVpost)/HVpre] is calculated by dividing the difference between the preoperative intracerebral hematoma volume (HVpre) and the postoperative volume at 6–8 days (HVpost) by the preoperative volume.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The process of intracerebral hemorrhage was calculated by 3D slice.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 26.0 software. Frequency (percentage) [n(%)] was used to express count data, and the χ2 test was used for group comparisons. Measurement data with a normal distribution were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (x ± s), and group comparisons were performed using the two-sample t-test and one-way ANOVA, with further pairwise comparisons using the SNK-q method. Ordinal data were compared using the rank-sum test. The interquartile range was used to divide (HVpre-HVpost)/HVpre into four quartiles for stratified analysis to investigate the relationship between changes in cerebral hemorrhage and clinical outcomes. Factors identified in univariate analysis were included in a multivariate logistic regression model to determine independent risk factors affecting aSAH prognosis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and precision recall (PR) curve was used to assess the predictive value of HVpre and HVpost for adverse outcomes. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

This study included 62 patients (24 males [38.7%] and 38 females [61.3%]), with an average age of 57.79 ± 13.18 years. In terms of prognosis, 37 patients (59.68%) had a favorable outcome, while 25 patients (40.32%) had a poor outcome. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the good and poor prognosis groups in age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Hunt-Hess, mFS, HVpre, HVpost, and (HVpre−HVpost)/HVpre (p < 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographics and clinical features of patients with aSAH.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified gender, age, HVpre, HVpost, and (HVpre−HVpost)/HVpre as independent risk factors influencing prognosis in aSAH patients (Table 2).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of prognostic factors after aSAH.

When comparing HVpre and HVpost with commonly used clinical scores, it was found that as GCS decreased and Hunt-Hess and mFS increased, HVpre and HVpost showed a statistically significant increase (p < 0.01) (Table 3).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Relationship between preoperative and postoperative hematoma volume and clinical scoring scale in patients with aSAH.

Stratified analysis of (HVpre−HVpost)/HVpre indicated that a higher hemorrhage reduction rate was associated with a lower likelihood of adverse clinical outcomes (Table 4).

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Outcome association with stratified analysis of the cerebral hemorrhage reduction.

The ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC for GCS (0.681; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.593–0.769; p = 0.004), Hunt-Hess (0.693; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.605–0.782; p = 0.004), and mFS (0.723; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.639–0.807; p < 0.001) were similar. However, the AUCs for HVpre (0.831; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.763–0.899; p = 0.002) and HVpost (0.857; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.795–0.920; p < 0.001) were significantly higher than those for commonly used clinical scales. When HVpre volume exceeded 22.25 mL, the risk of poor prognosis increased significantly, with a sensitivity of 79.3% and a specificity of 67.1%. Similarly, when HVpost volume exceeded 15.67 mL, the risk of poor prognosis increased significantly, with a sensitivity of 80.7% and a specificity of 69.3% (Figure 3). At the same time, the PR curve results showed that the AUC of HVpre and HVpost were also higher than those of the commonly used clinical scales (Figure 4).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Comparison of several score models comparison using receiver operator characteristic curve.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Comparison of several score models comparison using precision recall curve.

Discussion

As populations age and lifestyles change, the global healthcare system is under increasing pressure, with stroke posing a significant threat to quality of life and life expectancy. aSAH, a subtype of stroke, has a high mortality and disability rate, with most survivors experiencing neurological dysfunction, which profoundly impacts both patients and their families (10). The volume of subarachnoid hemorrhage is closely linked to treatment choices and patient prognosis. Hemorrhage volume is now recognized as an independent predictor of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), seizures, and shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. It is also a critical indicator in determining the prognosis of aSAH patients, closely associated with clinical treatment strategies, functional recovery, and mortality. Therefore, accurate measurement of hematoma volume is of significant clinical importance (11, 12).

Previous studies have predominantly relied on clinical and radiological scores to assess the clinical symptoms and hematoma volume in aSAH, aiming to predict the likelihood of adverse outcomes and, consequently, determine prognosis (13). Clinical scores are mainly used to evaluate a patient’s mental status and neurological dysfunction, providing insight into the extent of brain injury following aSAH, as measured by scales such as GCS, Hunt-Hess, and mFS. Radiological scores, on the other hand, assess disease severity through imaging-based quantitative indicators, including hemorrhage volume, hemorrhage location, and the degree of brain edema observed on CT scans (14).

The Fisher scale or mFS is commonly used to assess aSAH through radiological scoring, predicting the occurrence of vasospasm and DCI by quantifying hemorrhage volume. However, the application of these scales remains controversial. A meta-analysis reviewing nearly 40 years of literature found that although both the Fisher scale and mFS can predict DCI by evaluating aSAH hematoma volume, the Fisher scale does not show a progressive relationship where higher grades consistently correspond to an increased likelihood of DCI, limiting its clinical utility (15). While the mFS partially addresses this limitation, a three-year single-center retrospective cohort study by Couret et al. (16) involving 230 aSAH patients revealed that the mFS has poor sensitivity and specificity in predicting vasospasm or DCI. Additionally, studies have highlighted that these scores are subject to individual variability, with the same CT images potentially yielding different results depending on the evaluator, resulting in only moderate inter-rater consistency for mFS scores (17). To address these limitations, Eagles et al. (18) introduced an innovative approach using a modified Graeb scale for semi-quantitative assessment of intraventricular hemorrhage following intracranial aneurysm rupture, replacing the qualitative description of intraventricular hemorrhage in the mFS. This new binary semi-quantitative evaluation scale has shown some improvement in predicting adverse outcomes. However, as a semi-quantitative system, it still relies on subjective evaluation of CT images by the reviewers, which does not resolve the issue of inter-rater reliability. Thus, we began to explore whether an objective and quantitative description of subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage, and intracerebral hematoma before surgery and approximately 1 week after intracranial aneurysm rupture could address these issues and further improve the ability to predict prognosis.

Previous studies have suggested that the Tada formula is suitable for calculating hematomas that are relatively regular and ellipsoidal in shape. However, for subarachnoid hemorrhage, which often involves widespread bleeding and is frequently accompanied by ventricular system hemorrhage, the Tada formula is not appropriate (19). With the ongoing promotion of “precision medicine” in neurosurgery, accurately calculating the volume of irregular hematomas, which is crucial for patient treatment, has become an emerging research focus. 3D-Slicer, an open-source software that has recently gained attention for its role in surgical assistance, allows for the reconstruction of human tissues and organs from raw DICOM format data. It is compatible with multiple operating systems, runs smoothly on personal computers, and is relatively easy to use (20). Previous research has shown that 3D-Slicer can quantify the irregularity of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhages, thereby predicting hematoma growth (21), and is particularly useful in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (22). However, there have been few studies assessing aSAH approximately 1 week after onset. Fragata et al. (23)noted that brain CT perfusion decreases 8–10 days after acute subarachnoid hemorrhage in DCI patients, which may have some value in preventing DCI. Therefore, this study utilized 3D Slicer to measure hematoma volumes in aSAH patients before surgery and 6–8 days post-surgery, and compared these measurements with commonly used clinical scales to evaluate their predictive value for patient prognosis. The goal is to provide an objective, precise, and quantitative method for assessing aSAH hematoma volume, thereby improving the accuracy of prognosis prediction.

This study found that age, GCS, and Hunt-Hess in aSAH patients were associated with prognosis. Additionally, mFS, HVpre, HVpost, and (HVpre−HVpost)/HVpre also demonstrated statistical significance in relation to prognosis. Building on these findings, further analysis using a multivariate logistic regression model revealed that HVpre, HVpost, and (HVpre−HVpost)/HVpre remained statistically significant predictors of prognosis and were identified as independent risk factors.

This study further examined the differences in HVpre and HVpost among patients with varying GCS, Hunt-Hess, and mFS, revealing that the overall differences in HVpre and HVpost across these groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). While significant differences in HVpre and HVpost were observed between the higher (grades3 and 4) and lower (grades1 and 2) mFS levels, the differences in preoperative and approximately one-week postoperative hematoma volumes within the higher and lower levels themselves were minimal. This may help explain the discrepancies noted by Said et al. (14), where evaluators using mFS to assess the same imaging data had differing interpretations: when hematoma volumes are similar between grades, and since aSAH-related hemorrhage often spreads diffusely through the cisterns rather than being confined to a specific segment of the subarachnoid space, it becomes difficult for evaluators to clearly distinguish between adjacent grades based on visual assessment alone. For instance, it may be challenging to differentiate between mFS grade 3 and grade 4, or between grade 1 and grade 2.

In the stratified analysis of hematoma volume change rates, patients with greater changes in hematoma volume during the course of the disease had a lower likelihood of poor prognosis compared to those in the lower quartiles. Higher quartile values were associated with better clinical outcomes relative to the lowest quartile. ROC curve analysis indicated that both HVpre and HVpost have predictive value for poor prognosis, with HVpost showing a higher AUC (0.857 > 0.831), suggesting that HVpost has greater predictive value than HVpre. The PR curve shows the same result. Additionally, we found that when HVpre volume exceeds 22.25 mL, the risk of poor prognosis significantly increases, with a sensitivity of 79.3% and specificity of 67.1%. Similarly, when HVpost volume exceeds 15.67 mL, the risk of poor prognosis significantly increases, with a sensitivity of 80.7% and specificity of 69.3%. These findings suggest that HVpre, HVpost, and (HVpre−HVpost)/HVpre are reliable indicators of prognosis in aSAH patients.

This study has some limitations. First, it only compared hematoma volumes at preoperative and 6–8 days postoperative time points, without examining additional time points. Second, as a single-center retrospective study, it had a limited sample size and observation period, leading to a smaller number of patients in certain subgroups. Future research will involve larger-scale prospective studies to further elucidate the patterns of hematoma volume changes throughout the course of aSAH.

Conclusion

HVpre, HVpost, and (HVpre−HVpost)/HVpre can serve as neuroimaging biomarkers for assessing patients after aSAH and can effectively predict clinical prognosis.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

Our study is based on open-source public database, and the Anhui No. 2 Provincial People’s Hospital do not require research using publicly available data to be submitted for review to their ethics committee, so there are no ethical issues and other conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

ZH: Writing – original draft. FQ: Writing – review & editing. KM: Writing – review & editing. GJ: Writing – review & editing. LZ: Writing – review & editing. YZ: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Key project of Natural Science research in Universities of Anhui Province (KJ2020A0851).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank 3D Slicer software and platform developers.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Muehlschlegel, S. Subarachnoid hemorrhage. Continuum. (2018) 24:1623–57. doi: 10.1212/con.0000000000000679

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Etminan, N, Chang, HS, Hackenberg, K, de Rooij, NK, Vergouwen, MDI, Rinkel, GJE, et al. Worldwide incidence of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage according to region, time period, blood pressure, and smoking prevalence in the population: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. (2019) 76:588–97. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Zijlstra, IA, Gathier, CS, Boers, AM, Marquering, HA, Slooter, AJ, Velthuis, BK, et al. Association of Automatically Quantified Total Blood Volume after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with delayed cerebral ischemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2016) 37:1588–93. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4771

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Shen, Y, Dong, Z, Pan, P, Shi, H, and Song, Y. Risk factors for mild cognitive impairment in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage treated with endovascular coiling. World Neurosurg. (2018) 119:e527. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.196

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Santucci, JA, Ross, SR, Greenert, JC, Aghaei, F, Ford, L, Hollabaugh, KM, et al. Radiological estimation of intracranial blood volume and occurrence of hydrocephalus determines stress-induced hyperglycemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Transl Stroke Res. (2019) 10:327–37. doi: 10.1007/s12975-018-0646-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. van Norden, AG, van Dijk, GW, van Huizen, MD, Algra, A, and Rinkel, GJ. Interobserver agreement and predictive value for outcome of two rating scales for the amount of extravasated blood after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol. (2006) 253:1217–20. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0205-0

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Xu, X, Chen, X, Zhang, J, Zheng, Y, Sun, G, Yu, X, et al. Comparison of the Tada formula with software slicer: precise and low-cost method for volume assessment of intracerebral hematoma. Stroke. (2014) 45:3433–5. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.114.007095

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Ray, B, Ross, SR, Danala, G, Aghaei, F, Nouh, CD, Ford, L, et al. Systemic response of coated-platelet and peripheral blood inflammatory cell indices after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and long-term clinical outcome. J Crit Care. (2019) 52:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.03.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Senthilkumaran, S, Balamurugan, N, Menezes, RG, and Thirumalaikolundusubramanian, P. Role of Hounsfield units to distinguish Pseudo-subarachnoid hemorrhage. Clin Toxicol. (2011) 49:948. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2011.629619

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Sorteberg, A, Lashkarivand, A, and Western, E. Return to work after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Front Neurol. (2024) 15:1401493. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1401493

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Daou, BJ, Khalsa, SSS, Anand, SK, Williamson, CA, Cutler, NS, Aaron, BL, et al. Volumetric quantification of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage independently predicts hydrocephalus and seizures. J Neurosurg. (2021) 135:1155–63. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.Jns201273

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Hu, P, Wu, Y, Yan, T, Shu, L, Liu, F, Xiao, B, et al. Deep learning-based quantification of total bleeding volume and its association with complications, disability, and death in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. (2024) 141:343–54. doi: 10.3171/2024.1.JNS232280

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Lee, H, Perry, JJ, English, SW, Alkherayf, F, Joseph, J, Nobile, S, et al. Clinical prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. (2019) 130:1914–21. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.Jns172715

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Said, M, Odensass, S, Gümüs, M, Rodemerk, J, Chihi, M, Rauschenbach, L, et al. Comparing radiographic scores for prediction of complications and outcome of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: which performs best? Eur J Neurol. (2023) 30:659–70. doi: 10.1111/ene.15634

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. van der Steen, WE, Leemans, EL, van den Berg, R, Roos, Y, Marquering, HA, Verbaan, D, et al. Radiological scales predicting delayed cerebral ischemia in subarachnoid hemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroradiology. (2019) 61:247–56. doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02161-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Couret, D, Boussen, S, Cardoso, D, Alonzo, A, Madec, S, Reyre, A, et al. Comparison of scales for the evaluation of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study. Eur Radiol. (2024) 34:7526–36. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10814-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Melinosky, C, Kincaid, H, Claassen, J, Parikh, G, Badjatia, N, and Morris, NA. The modified fisher scale lacks interrater reliability. Neurocrit Care. (2021) 35:72–8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01142-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Eagles, ME, Jaja, BNR, and Macdonald, RL. Incorporating a modified Graeb score to the modified fisher scale for improved risk prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. (2018) 82:299–305. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx165

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Nag, MK, Koley, S, Sadhu, AK, Dutta, PK, Holsouser, B, Ashwal, S, et al. A computer-aided tool for automatic volume estimation of hematoma using non-contrast brain CT scans. Biomed Phys Eng Express. (2023) 9:256. doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/acd256

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Gonzalo Domínguez, M, Hernández, C, Ruisoto, P, Juanes, JA, Prats, A, and Hernández, T. Morphological and volumetric assessment of cerebral ventricular system with 3D slicer software. J Med Syst. (2016) 40:154. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0510-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Cao, L, Liu, M, Wang, M, Ding, J, Mao, K, Liu, K, et al. 3D slicer-based calculation of hematoma irregularity index for predicting hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage. BMC Neurol. (2022) 22:452. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02983-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Liao, R, Liu, L, Song, B, Wan, X, Wang, S, and Xu, J. 3D-slicer software-assisted neuroendoscopic surgery in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. Comput Math Methods Med. (2022) 2022:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2022/7156598

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Fragata, I, Alves, M, Papoila, AL, Diogo, M, Canhão, P, and Canto-Moreira, N. Temporal evolution of cerebral computed tomography perfusion after acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study. Acta Radiol. (2020) 61:376–85. doi: 10.1177/0284185119858701

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, 3D-Slicer, clinical prognosis, hematoma volume, neurosurgery

Citation: Huang Z, Qian F, Ma K, Jiang G, Zhang L and Zhang Y (2025) Changes in hematoma volume following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and its impact on patient prognosis. Front. Neurol. 15:1490957. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1490957

Received: 04 September 2024; Accepted: 04 December 2024;
Published: 08 January 2025.

Edited by:

Michael L. James, Duke University, United States

Reviewed by:

Tijana Nastasovic, University of Belgrade, Serbia
Bappaditya Ray, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States

Copyright © 2025 Huang, Qian, Ma, Jiang, Zhang and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yongming Zhang, enltaGYyOTY2QDE2My5jb20=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.