Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neurological Biomarkers
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1490024

Evaluating Plasma Biomarkers NfL, GFAP, GDF15, and FGF21 as Indicators of Disease Severity in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Patients

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia
  • 2 Children's Clinical University Hospital Latvia, Riga, Latvia
  • 3 Scientific Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia, Riga, Latvia
  • 4 Department of Human genetics, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  • 5 Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • 6 Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
  • 7 Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK, London, United Kingdom
  • 8 UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK, London, United Kingdom
  • 9 Hong Kong Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China, Hong Kong, China
  • 10 Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA, Wisconsin, United States
  • 11 Department of Biology and Microbiology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
  • 12 Rare Neurological Disease Centre, Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia, Riga, Latvia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Abstract Background Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), a slowly advancing hereditary nerve disorder, presents a significant challenge in the medical field. Effective drugs for treatment are lacking, and we struggle to find sensitive markers to track the disease's severity and progression. In this study, our objective was to investigate the levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL), glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP), fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21) and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) in individuals with CMT and to compare them to a control group. Our primary goal is to determine whether these biomarker levels are related to the severity of the disease. Methods Initially, 44 patients with CMT and 44 controls participated in this study. CMT diagnosis was approved by genetic testing. Disease severity was assessed through clinical evaluations using the CMT Neuropathy Score version 2 (CMTNSv2). NfL and GFAP concentrations were measured using Single molecule array, while FGF-21 and GDF-15 concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Results In the group of patients with CMT, the concentrations of GDF15, FGF21, NfL, and GFAP were significantly higher than in the control group (p<0.05). NfL and GFAP levels were correlated with the CMTNSv2 score (rs=0.46, p=0.002; rs=0.31, p=0.04). Conclusions Our study has provided confirmation that plasma concentrations of NfL, GFAP, GDF15, and FGF21 are significantly elevated in patients with CMT compared to controls. Furthermore, NfL and GFAP levels were correlated with the clinical severity of CMT. These findings suggest that NfL and GFAP can be reliable disease indicators in future research.

    Keywords: CMT, biomarker, NFL, FGF21, GFAP - Glial fibrillary acidic protein, GDF15

    Received: 02 Sep 2024; Accepted: 26 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Pretkalnina, Kenina, Gailite, Rots, Blennow, Zetterberg and Kenina. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Dace Pretkalnina, Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia
    Viktorija Kenina, Scientific Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia, Riga, Latvia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.