Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.
Sec. Epilepsy
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1480819
This article is part of the Research Topic Pharmaco-Resistance in Epileptic Conditions View all articles

Medial pulvinar stimulation in focal drug-resistant and vagal nerve stimulation-resistant epilepsy: interim 12 months post-implantation result of the "Pulvinar Stimulation in Epilepsy" study

Provisionally accepted
FRANCESCA PIZZO FRANCESCA PIZZO 1,2*Romain Carron Romain Carron 1,2Virginie Laguitton Virginie Laguitton 1Audrey Clement Audrey Clement 1Bernard Giusiano Bernard Giusiano 1,2Fabrice Bartolomei Fabrice Bartolomei 1,2
  • 1 Service d'épileptologie et de neurophysiologie clinique, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France
  • 2 INSERM U1106 Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Faculté de Médecine, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the medial pulvinar nucleus (PuM) in reducing seizure frequency and addressing comorbidities in patients with drug and vagal nerve-resistant focal epilepsy. Methods: This is an open-label prospective treatment trial with planned enrollment of 12 patients suffering from medically refractory epilepsy (Clinical trial gov NCT04692701), for which the interim 12 months post-implantation results for the first 6 patients are being reported. Inclusion criteria were focal epilepsy not suitable for or after failed surgical intervention, and previous failure of neurostimulation therapies (vagus nerve stimulation or anterior thalamic nucleus DBS). Evaluations included seizure diaries, neuropsychological assessments, and scales for depression, anxiety, quality of life, and seizure severity. PuM DBS was performed using ROSA robotic assistance, with follow-ups every three months for one year. Results: Out of six patients, five completed one year of follow-up (1 patient died prematurely). A non-significant trend towards seizure reduction was observed at six months, becoming more pronounced at one year (mean reduction: 45%; responders: 2/5). Seizure severity significantly improved (p=0.02), with a reduction in the NHS3 scale scores. Quality of life improved significantly at one year (p=0.03). Psychiatric assessments indicated a non-significant trend towards improvement in depression (mean improvement: 26%) and anxiety (mean improvement: 20%) scores. Neuropsychological testing showed stable or improved cognitive performance in three out of five patients. Adverse events included one case of cerebral hemorrhage, one infection leading to device removal, and one possible SUDEP. Significance: Preliminary results suggest that PuM DBS may offer a promising therapeutic option for reducing seizure severity and improving quality of life and cognitive functions in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Despite the small sample size and the presence of serious adverse events, the findings warrant further investigation with larger cohorts to confirm these trends and optimize the treatment protocol.

    Keywords: Deep Brain Stimulation, Neuromodulation, Quality of life in epilepsy, seizure reduction, Epilepsy comorbidities

    Received: 14 Aug 2024; Accepted: 08 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 PIZZO, Carron, Laguitton, Clement, Giusiano and Bartolomei. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: FRANCESCA PIZZO, Service d'épileptologie et de neurophysiologie clinique, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, 13005, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.