Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neuro-Otology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1477259

Is tinnitus burden and tinnitus exacerbation after cochlear implantation influenced by insertion technique, array dislocation and intracochlear trauma?

Provisionally accepted
Friederike Everad Friederike Everad *Rainer Linus Beck Rainer Linus Beck *Antje Aschendorff Antje Aschendorff Ann-Kathrin Rauch Ann-Kathrin Rauch Leonie Fries Leonie Fries *Susan Arndt Susan Arndt *Manuel Christoph Ketterer Manuel Christoph Ketterer *
  • University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Although numerous studies suggest that cochlear implantation (CI) generally alleviates the overall burden of tinnitus, certain patients experience tinnitus exacerbation following CI. The exact cause of this exacerbation is still uncertain. This prospective study aimed to investigate whether cochlear trauma, resulting from scalar dislocation of the electrode array, affected postoperative tinnitus intensity, tinnitus burden, and speech perception. Additionally, the influence of CI insertion technique, insertion depth, insertion angle, and cochlear morphology on postoperative tinnitus was assessed. Methods: We evaluated 66 CI recipients preoperatively at 2 days, 4 weeks, and 12- and 24-months following surgery. Digital volume tomography was employed to document scalar position, insertion depth, and cochlear morphology postoperatively. Speech perception was analyzed using Freiburg monosyllables. The tinnitus burden was evaluated using the tinnitus questionnaire developed by Goebel and Hiller (1998), while the tinnitus intensity was quantified using a visual analogue scale. Results: Study results pertaining to tinnitus intensity and burden did not reveal a significant difference in elevation regarding scalar position and dislocation after CI surgery compared to preoperative tinnitus levels. However, dislocation was only identified in four patients, and scala vestibuli insertions were observed in two patients. Comparing preoperative and 1-year postoperative outcomes, CI was noted to substantially reduce the tinnitus burden. When the speech processor was worn, the tinnitus intensity was significantly diminished. In comparison to round window insertion (RW), the insertion technique cochleostomy (CS) did not exhibit a significant difference or a trend toward increased tinnitus intensity. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that CI significantly decreases the tinnitus burden. The observation implies that the electrical stimulation of the auditory pathway, facilitated by wearing the speech processor, significantly reduced the tinnitus intensity. The incidence of dislocations and scala vestibuli insertions has declined to the extent where it is no longer feasible to formulate statistically significant conclusions.

    Keywords: cochlear implant, Tinnitus, Anatomy, psychometry, Cochlea

    Received: 07 Aug 2024; Accepted: 03 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Everad, Beck, Aschendorff, Rauch, Fries, Arndt and Ketterer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Friederike Everad, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Rainer Linus Beck, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Leonie Fries, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Susan Arndt, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Manuel Christoph Ketterer, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.