Editorial: Myelopathies and spinal cord injuries: advances and controversies in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Editorial on the Research Topic
Myelopathies and spinal cord injuries: advances and controversies in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Spinal cord injury (SCI) represents a temporary or permanent change to neurological function. Presentation is variable owing to the mechanism and severity of injury. Undoubtedly there have been improvements in pre-hospital care, diagnostics, surgical options, and intensive care therapies for people with SCI. However, the burden of SCIs on population health remains high due to their propensity to cause long-term disability, lower quality of life, reduced life expectancy, and high healthcare costs (1). Despite an increasing understanding of the biological processes underpinning SCI (2, 3), there is no universally effective treatment. Incremental and meaningful improvement of patient outcomes following SCI requires a multifaceted approach. Advances in neuro-regeneration provide hope for novel therapies that enhance functional recovery. In the complex context of SCI, articles in this Research Topic address different aspects of SCI—from diagnosis to future therapies.

Transverse myelitis is a rare inflammatory disorder that causes SCI. Evidence demonstrated that neurological disorders can complicate COVID-19 (4). Kawama et al. reported three patients diagnosed with myelitis associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection without radiographic abnormality on T2-weight MRI imaging, which is usually a feature of myelitis (5). Electrophysiological studies were helping in spinal cord localization to enable prompt immunosuppressive therapies. Despite the latency period between SARS-CoV-2 infection and neurological manifestation seen in the reported cases and those from the literature, Kawama et al. showed that patients can make good neurological recovery.

Primary and secondary injuries associated with traumatic SCI determine the neurological outcomes. Pharmacological neuroprotective agents may enhance recovery after traumatic SCI (6). To facilitate further investigations into the efficacy of neuroprotective agents, biomarkers for SCI severity may aid the stratification of SCI patients for trials. Li et al. set out to identify blood biomarkers associated with SCI severity. They first used transcriptomic data from a biorepository of people with SCI and healthy controls to identify a set of differentially expressed immune-related genes. Using functional enrichment analysis, co-expression network analysis, and immune deconvolution methods, the authors reported immune characteristics correlating with SCI severity according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale. The validation experiments using quantitative polymerase chain reaction supported their findings in 10 external SCI patients. Their findings raise the possibility of using peripheral blood biomarkers to quantify the neuroinflammation following SCI. Solou et al. presented a literature review of six observational studies reporting surgical management of adults with SCI but without spinal canal compromise. Surgical management unsurprisingly varied; groups included laminectomy, laminoplasty, and laminectomy plus duroplasty or durotomy. Recommendations cannot be taken from this narrative review though consideration of intra-spinal pressure may guide surgical options. Whether the act of opening the theca changes the neuroinflammatory process after SCI may be worth investigating.

Regenerative neurology holds promises for the treatment of SCI. Xia et al. summarized how mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may form a treatment for SCI due to their roles in reducing inflammation, promoting axonal regeneration, and vascular repair. The authors reviewed the relevant mechanistic pathways and provided an overview of the clinical applications in studies. As highlighted by the authors, there are many challenges to overcome in ensuring the survival of transplanted MSCs and inducing the intended effects. Further experimental studies to determine the optimal conditions for MSCs in combination with in vivo imaging (7) will get us closer to successful later phase clinical trials.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a prevalent cause of SCIs in adults. Surgical decompression is a management option, but the treatment response is variable. There is emerging evidence that cervical muscle morphology, which can be assessed on routine imaging, may be associated with functional outcomes after surgery for DCM. Naghdi et al. measured cervical muscle morphology in 171 patients undergoing surgery for DCM. Of the morphometric measures they collected, greater asymmetry and fatty infiltration were associated with worse outcomes at 6 and 12 months. This finding is not surprising since muscle morphology is related to surgical outcomes in degenerative lumbar spinal disease (8). While findings by Naghdi et al. may aid patient selection, it is important to consider whether this is a modifiable factor or a proxy measure for frailty.

Central cord syndrome (CCS) is a form of SCI characterized by prominent upper limb dysfunction with relative sparing of lower limb function. Advances in our understanding of the spinal cord prompted (Shakil et al.) to discuss the pathophysiology of CCS. They highlighted recent evidence from studies on humans and primates that supports the lack of somatotopic representation of the corticospinal tract in the spinal cord (9). Injury associated with CCS is a diffuse process. The authors also discussed the clinical application of this understanding in the context of two illustrative cases.

Taken together, the articles in this Research Topic offer a wide perspective on SCI and serve to inform the readers of developments in our understanding of the pathophysiology and clinical management of SCI.

Author contributions

MP: Visualization, Resources, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. MG: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation. OL: Visualization, Resources, Writing – review & editing, Project administration. CC: Visualization, Resources, Writing – review & editing. AD: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Project administration.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Safdarian M, Trinka E, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Thomschewski A, Aali A, Abady GG, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of spinal cord injury, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. (2023) 22:1026–47. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00287-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ahuja CS, Wilson JR, Nori S, Kotter MRN, Druschel C, Curt A, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2017) 3:17018. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.18

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Akter F, Yu X, Qin X, Yao S, Nikrouz P, Syed YA, et al. The pathophysiology of degenerative cervical myelopathy and the physiology of recovery following decompression. Front Neurosci. (2020) 14:138. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00138

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Xu E, Xie Y, Al-Aly Z. Long-term neurologic outcomes of COVID-19. Nat Med. (2022) 28:2406–15. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02001-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Goh C, Desmond PM, Phal PM. MRI in transverse myelitis. Magn Reson Imaging. (2014) 40:1267–79. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24563

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Fehlings MG, Moghaddamjou A, Harrop JS, Stanford R, Ball J, Aarabi B, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Riluzole in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (RISCIS): a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial. J Neurotrauma. (2023) 40:1878–88. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0163

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hubertus V, Meyer L, Roolfs L, Waldmann L, Nieminen-Kelhä M, Fehlings MG, et al. In vivo imaging in experimental spinal cord injury – Techniques and trends. Brain Spine. (2022) 2:100859. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2021.100859

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Jermy JE, Copley PC, Poon MTC, Demetriades AK. Does pre-operative multifidus morphology on MRI predict clinical outcomes in adults following surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spine disease? A systematic review. Eur Spine J. (2020) 29:1318–27. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06423-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Levi AD, Schwab JM. A critical reappraisal of corticospinal tract somatotopy and its role in traumatic cervical spinal cord syndromes. J Neurosurg: Spine. (2022) 36:653–9. doi: 10.3171/2021.7.SPINE21546

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar