Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neurorehabilitation
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1460925
This article is part of the Research Topic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in Motor Control and Motor Rehabilitation: Current Trends and Future Directions View all 5 articles

Effects of Low Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients with Different Motor Evoked Potential Status

Provisionally accepted
Wenjun Qian Wenjun Qian *Xiaoyu Liao Xiaoyu Liao Xiaowen Ju Xiaowen Ju *Yaxin Gao Yaxin Gao Miao Wu Miao Wu *Chen Xie Chen Xie *Yaoying Zhang Yaoying Zhang *Surong Qian Surong Qian *Yan Gong Yan Gong *
  • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,, Suzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objectives: To explore the effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) on motor function and cortical excitability in stroke patients with different motor evoked potential (MEP) status.Methods: A total of 80 stroke patients were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial and divided into two groups according to MEP status (-or +) of lesioned hemisphere.Then, each group was randomly assigned to receive either active or sham LF-rTMS. In addition to conventional rehabilitation, all participants received 20 sessions of rTMS at 1 Hz frequency through the active or the sham coil over 4 weeks. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Shoulder Abduction Finger Extension (SAFE) and Barthel Index (BI), bilateral resting motor threshold (rMT), amplitude of Motor evoked potential (MEP) and Central Motor Conduction Time (CMCT), and Interhemispheric asymmetry (IHA) were blindly assessed at baseline, 4weeks and 8 weeks after treatment, respectively. Results: At 4 weeks after intervention, FMA and NIHSS changed scores in 1Hz MEP(+) group were significantly higher than those in the other three groups (P<0.001). After receiving 1Hz rTMS, stroke patients with MEP(+) showed significant changes in their bilateral cortical excitability (P<0.05). At 8 weeks after intervention, 1Hz MEP(+) group experienced higher changes in NIHSS, FMA, SAFE, and BI scores than other groups (P<0.001). Furthermore, 1Hz rTMS intervention could decrease unaffected cortical excitability and enhance affected cortical excitability of stroke patients with MEP(+) (P <0.05). The correlation analysis revealed that FMA motor change score was associated with decreased unaffected MEP amplitude (r=-0.401, P=0.010) and decreased affected rMT (r=-0.584, P<0.001) from baseline, which was only observed in the MEP(+) group. Conclusions: The effects of LF-rTMS on motor recovery and cortical excitability were more effective in stroke patients with MEP than those with no MEP.

    Keywords: Stroke, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, motor evoked potential, motor recovery, cortical excitability

    Received: 07 Jul 2024; Accepted: 26 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Qian, Liao, Ju, Gao, Wu, Xie, Zhang, Qian and Gong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Wenjun Qian, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,, Suzhou, China
    Xiaowen Ju, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,, Suzhou, China
    Miao Wu, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,, Suzhou, China
    Chen Xie, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,, Suzhou, China
    Yaoying Zhang, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,, Suzhou, China
    Surong Qian, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,, Suzhou, China
    Yan Gong, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,, Suzhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.