Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neuro-Otology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1448989
This article is part of the Research Topic Challenges and Current Research Status of Vertigo/Vestibular Diseases Volume III View all 4 articles

Bilaterally positive head-impulse tests can differentiate AICA infarction from labyrinthitis

Provisionally accepted
Sung-Hwan Kim Sung-Hwan Kim 1Hanseob Kim Hanseob Kim 2Sun-Uk Lee Sun-Uk Lee 1*Euyhyun Park Euyhyun Park 1Bang-Hoon Cho Bang-Hoon Cho 1Kyung-Hee H. Cho Kyung-Hee H. Cho 1Gerard Jounghyun Kim Gerard Jounghyun Kim 2Sungwook Yu Sungwook Yu 1Ji Soo Kim Ji Soo Kim 3
  • 1 Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 2 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Informatics, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 3 Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Video head-impulse tests (video-HITs) often fail to detect anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) infarction due to peripheral and central vestibular system involvement. Anecdotal studies suggest that video-HITs may reveal bilateral impairment in AICA infarction. However, the diagnostic utility of video-HITs has not been established, particularly when compared to labyrinthitis, which accounts for the majority of acute audiovestibular syndrome (AAVS) cases. We reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients presenting with new-onset acute hearing loss and spontaneous vertigo (i.e. AAVS) between March 2018 and July 2023 at a tertiary hospital in South Korea. Video-HIT patterns were categorized as follows:1) ipsilaterally positive, 2) contralaterally positive, 3) bilaterally normal, and 4) bilaterally positive. Twenty-eight patients with AICA infarction (mean age±standard deviation = 67±15 years; 14 men) and 51 with labyrinthitis (63±17 years; 26 men) were included in the analyses. Among the 28 patients with AICA infarction, 15 presented with AAVS in isolation, without other co-morbid neurologic deficits (15/28, 54%). The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gains of ipsilesional horizontal canals (HCs) ranged from 0.21 to 1.22 (median = 0.81, interquartile range [IQR] = 0.50–0.89). However, those for contralateral HC gain ranged from 0.57 to 1.19 (median = 0.89 [IQR = 0.73–0.97]). Collectively, HITs were bilaterally positive in 13 patients (including 12 patients with bilaterally positive HITs for the horizontal canal), normal in eight, ipsilesionally positive in six, and contralesionally positive in one patient with AICA infarction. The VOR gains were typically decreased ipsilaterally in 28 (28/51, 55%), normal in 17 (17/51, 33%), and decreased bilaterally in six patients with labyrinthitis (6/51, 12%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that bilaterally positive HITs (p=0.004) and multiple vascular risk factors (p=0.043) were more frequently associated with AICA infarction than labyrinthitis. Among patients presenting with AAVS, bilaterally positive HITs can be indicative of AICA infarction in patients with multiple vascular risk factors.

    Keywords: anterior inferior cerebellar artery, Vertigo, Labyrinthitis, Infarction, Headimpulse tests

    Received: 14 Jun 2024; Accepted: 13 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Kim, Kim, Lee, Park, Cho, Cho, Kim, Yu and Kim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Sun-Uk Lee, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.