Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.
Sec. Headache and Neurogenic Pain
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1433423

Treatment Patterns of Patients with Migraine Eligible for Anti-CGRP Pathway

Provisionally accepted
Ani C. Khodavirdi Ani C. Khodavirdi 1*Jasjit Multani Jasjit Multani 2Sam S. Oh Sam S. Oh 1*Fiston Vuvu Fiston Vuvu 1*Mark E. Bensink Mark E. Bensink 3Karen M. Stockl Karen M. Stockl 2*Kevin Hawkins Kevin Hawkins 2*Chia- Chun Chiang Chia- Chun Chiang 4*A L. Green A L. Green 5*Stewart Tepper Stewart Tepper 6
  • 1 Amgen (United States), Thousand Oaks, California, United States
  • 2 IQVIA (United States), Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, United States
  • 3 Benofit Consulting, Brisbane, Australia
  • 4 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
  • 5 Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
  • 6 The New England Institute for Neurology and Headache, Stamford MA, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Migraine is a debilitating neurological disorder, with a wide range of symptoms and disease burden, underscoring the heterogeneity of patients' disease characteristics and treatment needs. To characterize the profile of migraine patients in the US who may be eligible for preventive treatment with an anti-CGRP pathway mAb and to better understand treatment patterns and real-world use of acute and preventive medications for migraine, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients identified as having migraine using diagnosis codes or migraine-specific medication use (first = index) in the IQVIA PharMetrics ® Plus database. Patients were required to have ≥12 months of continuous enrollment in medical and pharmacy benefits prior to index (baseline) and after index (follow-up). Patients were stratified into chronic migraine (CM) and non-chronic migraine (non-CM) by diagnosis codes. Based on acute migrainespecific medication dispensing data in the follow-up period, non-CM patients were divided into 3 cohorts: highest, middle, and lowest tertile of total units of dispensed acute migraine-specific medication (gepants, ditans, ergot derivatives, and triptans). Migraine medication use was captured in the baseline and followup periods. 22,584 CM and 216,807 non-CM patients (72,269 patients in each tertile) were identified and included in the study. Over the follow-up, CM patients had a mean of 70 units of acute migraine-specific medications dispensed, while the highest, middle, and lowest tertile of non-CM patients had a mean of 92, 29, and 10 units, respectively. Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway mAbs were dispensed for 28.9% of CM patients, and for 6.9%, 4.1%, and 2.9% of non-CM patients in the highest, middle, and lowest tertiles, respectively. A lower proportion of non-CM patients had use of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway mAbs compared to CM patients, confirming the unmet need with appropriate preventive medication. There appears to be a persistent gap in management of patients without a diagnosis of CM who are dispensed high quantities of acute migraine-specific medications.

    Keywords: chronic migraine, Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide, Treatment patterns, nonchronic migraine, monthly headache days

    Received: 15 May 2024; Accepted: 19 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Khodavirdi, Multani, Oh, Vuvu, Bensink, Stockl, Hawkins, Chiang, Green and Tepper. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Ani C. Khodavirdi, Amgen (United States), Thousand Oaks, 91320, California, United States
    Sam S. Oh, Amgen (United States), Thousand Oaks, 91320, California, United States
    Fiston Vuvu, Amgen (United States), Thousand Oaks, 91320, California, United States
    Karen M. Stockl, IQVIA (United States), Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, United States
    Kevin Hawkins, IQVIA (United States), Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, United States
    Chia- Chun Chiang, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55902, Minnesota, United States
    A L. Green, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, Arizona, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.