Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neurorehabilitation
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1413577
This article is part of the Research Topic Exploring Evidence for Neurorehabilitation Advancements View all 13 articles

Effects of Body Weight Support Training on Balance and Walking Function in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Provisionally accepted
Zhaoxiang Jiang Zhaoxiang Jiang 1,2Xinxin Zhang Xinxin Zhang 1Qian Fu Qian Fu 1Yan Li Yan Li 1,3*
  • 1 Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China
  • 2 Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Region, China
  • 3 Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin, Guangx, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Here is the revised passage with a reduction of 30 words: To evaluate the impact of body weight support training (BWST) on balance and gait in stroke patients based on evidence and identify the most effective intervention strategies, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and Chinese SinoMed Database until November 25, 2023. Quality assessment and meta-analysis were conducted using RevMan 5.2 and Stata 14.0 software. We included 31 randomized controlled trials with 1,918 patients. The meta-analysis showed BWST significantly improved Berg Balance Scale (BBS) scores (MD=3.60; 95% CI: 1.23 to 5.98; p=0.003), gait speed (SMD=0.77; 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.15; p<0.0001), and step length (SMD=0.46; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.72; p=0.0008) compared to conventional rehabilitation. For balance function, the most effective interventions were a disease duration of 3-6 months (MD=5.16; 95% CI: 0.76 to 9.57; p=0.02), an intervention time of 4-8 weeks (MD=5.70; 95% CI: 2.90 to 8.50; p<0.0001), a maximum body weight support level above 30% (MD=3.80; 95% CI: 1.48 to 6.13; p=0.001), and a maximum training walking speed of 0.2 m/s or more (MD=4.66; 95% CI: 0.37 to 9.70; p=0.03). For walking function, optimal interventions were also a disease duration of 3-6 months (gait speed: SMD=0.59; 95% CI: 0.15 to 1.03; p=0.008; step length: SMD=0.27; 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.56; p=0.04), an intervention time of 4-8 weeks (gait speed: SMD=1.01; 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.59; p=0.0006; step length: SMD=0.83; 95% CI: 0.54 to 1.12; p<0.00001), a maximum body weight support level above 30% (gait speed: SMD=0.79; 95% CI: 0.36 to 1.22; p=0.0003; step length: SMD=0.79; 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.11; p<0.00001), and a maximum training walking speed of 0.2 m/s or more (gait speed: SMD=1.26; 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.90; p=0.0001; step length: SMD=0.85; 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.31; p=0.0003). BWST demonstrates superior efficacy in enhancing balance and walking function compared to conventional rehabilitation, with an optimal intervention strategy including a disease duration of 3-6 months, an intervention period of 4-8 weeks, a maximum body weight support of 30% or more, and a maximum training walking speed of 0.2 m/s or greater.

    Keywords: Body weight support training, Stroke, balance, Walking function, Meta-analysis

    Received: 29 Apr 2024; Accepted: 15 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Jiang, Zhang, Fu and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Yan Li, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.